Skip to main content

Advertisement

Sevoflurane and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus on the rise: copeptin to the rescue?

Article metrics

The original article was published in Critical Care 2018 22:33

With interest, we read the recent paper by Nigro et al. on the differential diagnosis of hypernatremia in intensive care unit (ICU) [1]. One of their main findings was an evidently higher copeptin levels in nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI), compared to central diabetes insipidus (CDI). When choosing a cutoff value of < 4.4 pmol/L, copeptin levels had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99% for diagnosing CDI, whereas the values for NDI were approximately 18 times higher [1]. These findings confirmed the results of an earlier study by Timper et al. [2]. While the authors claim that the incidence of NDI remains very low, this may change with the increasing use of sevoflurane in ICU, which appears to be effective in reducing wake-up and extubation times and was recently described for sedation in acute respiratory distress syndrome [3]. In a recent retrospective study, of the 35 patients receiving sevoflurane, seven patients presented with NDI during their ICU stay (i.e., 20%) [3]. The main finding of this study was that sevoflurane sedation in ICU was associated with NDI in relation to concentration and duration of exposure. All patients with NDI were sedated with mean end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane > 1.0 vol% and for more than 72 h. Cabibel et al. also described the occurrence of three cases of NDI after 4 days or more of 1 vol% end-tidal sevoflurane administration [4]. It is thought that sevoflurane temporarily reduces urinary concentration capacity mechanisms allowing aquaporin 2 expression on cellular membranes [5]. Alternatively inorganic fluoride produced with hexafluoroisopropanolol during sevoflurane metabolism by cytochrome P450 may be toxic [4]. The differential diagnosis between NDI and CDI can be problematic as both groups may present with neurological problems [1]. Only a trial dose of desmopressin could differentiate as most but not all with NDI will remain unresponsive [3, 4]. Copeptin may resolve the diagnosis dilemma [1] allowing institution of appropriate treatment, either by removal of the cause (sevoflurane) or the treatment of the causality (brain edema, cerebral bleeding, etc.). In summary, as long as sevoflurane use increases and in the knowledge that 20% of these cases develop NDI, copeptin is a valuable tool permitting a rapid and definitive differential diagnosis between CDI and NDI.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ICU:

Intensive care unit

NDI:

Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus

CDI:

Central diabetes insipidus

References

  1. 1.

    Nigro N, Winzeler B, Suter-Widmer I, Schuetz P, Arici B, Bally M. Copeptin levels and commonly used laboratory parameters in hospitalised patients with severe hypernatraemia - the "co-MED study". Crit Care. 2018;22(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-1955-7.

  2. 2.

    Timper K, Fenske W, Kuhn F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of copeptin in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(6):2268–74.

  3. 3.

    L'Heudé M, Poignant S, Elaroussi D, Espitalier F, Ferrandière M, Laffon M. Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus associated with prolonged sedation with sevoflurane in the intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(5):e73–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.02.009 Epub 2019 Mar 11.

  4. 4.

    Cabibel R, Gerard L, Maiter D, Collin V, Hantson P. Complete nephrogenic diabetes insipidus after prolonged sevoflurane sedation: a case report about 3 cases. A A Pract. 2019;12(5):155e9 [Report].

  5. 5.

    Morita K, Otsuka F, Ogura T, et al. Sevoflurane anaesthesia causes a transient decrease in aquaporin-2 and impairment of urine concentration. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:734e9.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

PMH and WB designed the paper. All authors participated in drafting and reviewing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Correspondence to Patrick M. Honore.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This comment refers to the article available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-1955-7.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark