- Open Access
Optimal pressing strength and time for capillary refilling time
© The Author(s). 2019
- Received: 26 November 2018
- Accepted: 18 December 2018
- Published: 8 January 2019
Substantial investigations on the microcirculation have highlighted the importance of the capillary refilling time (CRT), which is widely used in clinical settings [1–3]. However, CRT measurement conditions, including pressing strength and time, are inconsistent (e.g., pressing strength: light, moderate, or firm; pressing time: 3 s, 5 s, or until the capillary bed visually blanches) [2–5]. CRT is conventionally measured visually after manual compression, which limits the accuracy of measurement and precludes the precise determination of how long and strong the nail bed should be pressed. Therefore, we developed a novel device which can be adjusted for pressing strength and time to precisely measure CRT using an electric actuator and strength and color sensors.
CRT was measured in age- and sex-matched healthy adults (n = 31) using the developed device under conditions of pressing strength of 1, 3, 5, and 7 N, and a pressing time 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 s (Additional file 1: Methods and supplemental data).
In the study aimed at identifying the standard pressing strength and CRT, pressing the nail bed with 3–7 N for 2 s appears to be optimal. Further development of portable CRT measurement devices fulfilling these conditions may contribute to achieving precise CRT measurements to monitor the microcirculation in clinical settings.
We thank Mr. Yutaka Furukawa, Mr. Minami Nagano, Ms. Eriko Miyazaki, Ms. Shino Tateishi, and Ms. Ayako Teratani for helping with data collection.
This work was supported by AMED (#JPhe1502001). The funder had no role in the study design, experiments, collection, analyses, interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript, or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during our study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
RK and TN: These authors contributed to the study conceptualization and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, statistical analysis, and drafting and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. MS and TN: These authors contributed to developing the device, interpretation of data, and drafting and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. TO, HH, and SO: These authors contributed to the study conceptualization and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study participants were informed of the experiment and agreements were obtained via consent form before the measurements. All procedures in this study were approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent for the publication was obtained.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Chiba University has filed a provisional patent application covering aspects of this manuscript. TN, TN, HH, and SO are listed as inventors.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- De Backer D, Ospina-Tascon G, Salgado D, Favory R, Creteur J, Vincent JL. Monitoring the microcirculation in the critically ill patient: current methods and future approaches. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:1813–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ait-Oufella H, Bige N, Boelle PY, Pichereau C, Alves M, Bertinchamp R, Baudel JL, Galbois A, Maury E, Guidet B. Capillary refill time exploration during septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:958–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alegria L, Vera M, Dreyse J, Castro R, Carpio D, Henriquez C, Gajardo D, Bravo S, Araneda F, Kattan E, et al. A hypoperfusion context may aid to interpret hyperlactatemia in sepsis-3 septic shock patients: a proof-of-concept study. Ann Intensive Care. 2017;7:29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pickard A, Karlen W, Ansermino JM. Capillary refill time: is it still a useful clinical sign? Anesth Analg. 2011;113:120–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fleming S, Gill P, Jones C, Taylor JA, Van den Bruel A, Heneghan C, Roberts N, Thompson M. The diagnostic value of capillary refill time for detecting serious illness in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0138155.View ArticleGoogle Scholar