# Trigonometry in daily ultrasound practice

The Original Article was published on 08 November 2018

We have read with interest the editorial by Piton et al. [1] regarding application of Pythagorasâ€™ theorem in central venous cannulation. Geometry is at the base of our daily life and we should apply his theorems and axioms to obtain the best result in our daily practice.

We believe that trigonometry is another important branch of geometry in addition to Pythagorasâ€™ theorem that has to be taken into consideration while performing invasive procedures under ultrasound guidance. Sine, cosine and tangent are the basis of trigonometry, they represent the ratio between the sides of a right-angled triangle. Sin(Î±) is the ratio between side B and the hypotenuse (H) (Fig.Â 1), Cos(Î±) is the ratio between side A and the hypotenuse (H), and Tan(Î±) is the ratio between side B and side A. It is important to note that, for a given angle Î±, the ratio between the sides is unconnected from the triangle size.

As already stated by Piton [1], in our ultrasound daily practice, we constantly build right-angled triangles: the hypotenuse is the needle route, side A is the distance measured on the skin between needle insertion point and target projection on the skin, and side B is the depth of the target.

Side B is determined by the patientâ€™s anatomy and the operator cannot modify it. As reported by Schulman et al. [2], needle/skin angulation between 30Â° and 45Â° is considered to be ideal while performing ultrasound procedure.

Trigonometry is helpful in determining which targets can be reached with such needle angulation. At 45Â° angulation tan(Î±) is equal to 1, meaning that side A and side B have to be equal. For example, if our target jugular internal vein is 2â€‰cm deep, the needle has to be inserted 2â€‰cm from the target. Generalizing, we have a good needle visualization whenever Tan(Î±)â€‰â‰¤ 1 with side B equal to or shorter than side A.

In conclusion, physicians have to take into account target depth while choosing the ultrasound linear probe of appropriate size to be able to visualize all needle routes and the needle skin entrance site.

## References

1. Piton G, Capellier G, Winiszewski H. Ultrasound-guided vessel puncture:Calling for Pythagorasâ€™ help. Crit Care. 2018;22:292.

2. Schulman PM, Gerstein NS, Merkel MJ, Braner DA, Tegtmeyer K. Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the subclavian vein. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(1):e1.

None.

None.

Not applicable.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

ADC, LS, and MC wrote the manuscript and created the figure. The authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro De Cassai.

## Ethics declarations

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Publisherâ€™s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

See related Editorial by Piton et al., https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-018-2228-1

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions