Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Letter
  • Open Access

Bougie-in-channel intubation technique

Critical Care201822:253

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2184-9

  • Received: 21 August 2018
  • Accepted: 11 September 2018
  • Published:

The Letter to this article has been published in Critical Care 2018 22:334

Dear Editor,

Compared with elective endotracheal intubation for surgery, emergency endotracheal intubation for critically ill patients is more difficult because of the poor cardiorespiratory reserve of patients, stress and urgency of intubation, and environmental limitations outside of the operation theatre setting. Therefore, emergency intubation has higher complication rates and lower first-attempt success [1, 2]. Methods used to facilitate intubation include videolaryngoscopes and bougies [2, 3], and bougie use improves first-attempt intubation success compared with stylet use [4].

Although videolaryngoscopy often improves vocal cord visualization, intubation success does not seem to improve when adding videolaryngoscopy to bougie use. Better visualization does not ensure easier intubation, as insertion of the bougie into the trachea would still require optimal neck positioning and a straight oral-pharyngeal-laryngeal axis [5]. Channeled blades attached to hyperangulated videolaryngoscopes can overcome the limitation of neck positioning as the channel can guide a bougie toward the glottic opening. The bougie then can be shifted laterally out of the channel, allowing a large (size 7 or greater) endotracheal tube to be railroaded and rotated easily.

Since June 2018, we started to use the channeled blade of the King Vision videolaryngoscope (Ambu A/S, Ballerup, Denmark) in the following 16-step fashion (Fig. 1). Twenty-five respiratory therapists were introduced to the bougie-in-channel technique via a 15-min tutorial and demonstration. Of these therapists, who have never performed endotracheal intubation before, 24 successfully intubated a manikin within 2 min each and one therapist intubated at a second attempt. This technique has been rolled out in our medical intensive care unit with first-attempt success among the first 10 patients, and a formal audit is in progress.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Bougie-in-channel intubation technique. a Attach the disposable channeled blade to the videolaryngoscope. b Allow the patient’s neck to be in the neutral position. c Insert the videolaryngoscope into the oral cavity and visualize the glottic opening. d Insert the flexible bougie into the guiding channel of the disposable videolaryngoscope blade (that is, bougie-in-channel technique). e Advance the flexible bougie into the trachea. f While holding the videolaryngoscope in place, shift the bougie laterally out of the channel. g While holding the videolaryngoscope in place, railroad a lubricated endotracheal tube down the bougie until resistance is felt at the arytenoids and then pull the endotracheal tube back by about 2 cm. h While holding the videolaryngoscope in place, rotate the endotracheal tube 90° toward the patient’s left side (the bougie must be allowed to freely rotate together with the tube). i While holding the videolaryngoscope in place, advance the endotracheal tube until the black indicator line is at the level of the vocal cords. j While holding the videolaryngoscope in place, rotate the endotracheal tube back to the neutral position. k While holding the videolaryngoscope in place, remove the bougie. l While holding the videolaryngoscope in place, inflate the cuff. m While holding the videolaryngoscope in place, connect the tube to a ventilation device. n While holding the videolaryngoscope in place, confirm ventilation by chest auscultation. o Remove the videolaryngoscope. p Secure the endotracheal tube

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Alfredo Pineda for assisting with taking photos.

Authors’ contributions

KCS and JT conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript. KCS, ME, RC, SHW, JS, and JT jointly conducted training and implemented the bougie-in-channel intubation technique in our intensive care unit. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, National University Hospital, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block Level 10, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
(2)
Division of Critical Care, National University Hospital, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block Level 10, Singapore, 119228, Singapore

References

  1. Griesdale DE, Bosma TL, Kurth T, Isac G, Chittock DR. Complications of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1835–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Natt BS, Malo J, Hypes CD, Sakles JC, Mosier JM. Strategies to improve first attempt success at intubation in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(Suppl 1):i60–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabrini L, Landoni G, Baiardo Radaelli M, Saleh O, Votta CD, Fominskiy E, et al. Tracheal intubation in critically ill patients: a comprehensive systematic review of randomized trials. Crit Care. 2018;22:6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Driver BE, Prekker ME, Klein LR, Reardon RF, Miner JR, Fagerstrom ET, et al. Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube and Stylet on First-Attempt Intubation Success Among Patients With Difficult Airways Undergoing Emergency Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;319:2179–89.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Lascarrou JB, Boisrame-Helms J, Bailly A, Le Thuaut A, Kamel T, Mercier E, et al. Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy on Successful First-Pass Orotracheal Intubation Among ICU Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;317:483–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement