Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Letter
  • Open Access

Could ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheter insertion replace the use of chest X-ray?

Critical Care201822:206

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2130-x

  • Received: 30 June 2018
  • Accepted: 17 July 2018
  • Published:

The implementation of ultrasound protocols during catheter placement has demonstrated multiple advantages that increase accuracy and allow medical teams to reduce operative time, potential complications, and procedure costs [1, 2]. The wide use of lung and cardiac ultrasound in perioperative medicine enables earlier diagnosis of some acute complications, allowing prompt intervention and control of damage.

We present the Successful Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Catheter Insertion algorithm (Fig. 1), which is based on reports of safe vascular ultrasound protocols in daily practice [3, 4]. It follows an operational pipeline that integrates steps focused on adequate vascular identification, cannulation, and placement of the catheter. The operational steps are:
  • 1, 2 - A 2D vascular ultrasound in the Trendelenburg position identifies vessel characteristics and determines the “margin of safety”. If an overlap of the artery is present, there is a high possibility of artery injury.

  • 3-Assessment of color Doppler and pulsed Doppler completes the vascular identification, which can differentiate their flows and discount the presence of thrombus.

  • 4, 5 – Evaluation of a safety margin could guide modifications of puncture angles, avoiding injuries of the anterior or lateral artery wall.

  • 6-After getting venous return, guidewire advancement should be smooth and unobstructed and the thoracic direction needs to be confirmed. The presence of intraluminal dissection or false pathways should be detected.

  • 7, 8 - In the subcostal echocardiogram view, guidewire and catheter identification close to the heart helps to optimize adequate placement. The saline flush confirmation test can help to confirm this, but it should not be performed routinely.

  • 9- Although the use of ultrasound in real time for central venous access reduces the number of pleuropulmonary complications, a lung ultrasound assessment should be performed, seeking to identify potential associated lesions, guaranteeing prompt attention to the patient.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Catheter Insertion algorithm

The application of this algorithm optimizes the use of bedside ultrasound as a diagnostic tool, organizes the steps, and increases the early identification of potential operational errors. Rapid interventions significantly reduce the clinical impact on the patient and avoid the use of chest X-ray. Limitations for its implementation include the availability of the equipment with probes and staff training. This algorithm could also be useful in subclavian venous catheter placement, although the evidence does not statistically support the use of ultrasound for this application.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

WAZ and FRS contributed substantially to the design and writing of the manuscript. WAZ was responsible for obtaining the Permission Request from the Sociedad Colombiana de Anestesiología y Reanimación S.C.A.R.E., for the modification and publication of the algorithm of the article Canalización venosa yugular interna: ¿qué tanta seguridad podemos llegar a ofrecer? (Internal jugular vein cannulation: How much safety can we offer? [3]). Both authors were responsible for review and editing of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Cardiovascular and Transplant Anesthesiologist, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Universidad de los Andes, Universidad el Bosque, Cll 119 # 7-75, Bogotá, Colombia
(2)
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Intensive Care Medicine and Transplant Anesthesiologist, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Universidad de los Andes, Universidad el Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia

References

  1. Troianos CA, Hartman GS, Glas KE, et al. Guidelines for performing ultrasound guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:1291–318.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rupp SM, Apfelbaum JL, Blitt C, et al. Practice guidelines for central venous access: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on central venous access. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on central venous access. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:539–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Amaya-Zuñiga WF, Raffan-Sanabria F, Niño de Mejía C, et al. Internal jugular vein cannulation: how much safety can we offer? Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2015;43:76–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Saugel B, Scheeren TWL, Teboul JL. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: a structured review and recommendationsfor clinical practice. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):225.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement