Skip to main content

Bundle of care taking into account time to improve long-term outcome after cardiac arrest

The Original Article was published on 29 May 2018

Gough and Nolan [1] recently reviewed the rationale for using adrenaline in the treatment of cardiac arrest. As underlined by the authors, adrenaline has been recommended for cardiac arrest treatment since the 1960s, despite a lack of proof in animal and humans studies [1]. Adrenaline induces vasoconstriction by stimulating alpha receptors and increases tissue pressure perfusion, especially at the cerebral and coronary levels, that is associated with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) [2]. However, discrepancies exist between pathophysiological objectives and clinical results concerning adrenaline’s macro- and microcirculatory effects, leading since a few years to discussions on the potential negative action of adrenaline by itself [1].

Nevertheless, we believe that even if adrenaline administration remains one of the key aspects of the treatment of cardiac arrest in order to preserve tissue pressure perfusion, to improve long-term outcomes it seems essential to consider cardiac arrest resuscitation as a “bundle of care”, as similarly described for sepsis [3]. From this point of view, time is a much more important parameter than it is for sepsis: the time scale is not hours but minutes and strongly impacts not only short- but also long-term outcomes. Further studies should therefore define the components of this bundle of care and incorporate them in the fifth link (i.e., post-resuscitation care) of the chain of survival, even in the prehospital field when appropriate [4]. Regarding these components, cerebral protection should be emphasized and precociously integrated after cardiac arrest resuscitation, probably within the first minutes after ROSC. In our opinion, three targets appear important with regard to this bundle of care. Firstly, sedation should be started as soon as possible in order to put the brain to rest. Secondly, blood pressure should be optimized, avoiding both cerebral hypoperfusion due to post-resuscitation syndrome and, conversely, hyperperfusion, which could lead to cerebral edema. Thirdly, oxygen management is essential, and hyperoxia should be fought as soon as ROSC has occurred [5].

Finally, even if administration of adrenaline is a key aspect of ROSC, it is not sufficient alone to increase short- and especially long-term survival after cardiac arrest. A true bundle of care, including adrenaline, cerebral protection, and mostly a time schedule for the different therapeutics, should be implemented complementarily to the classic chain of survival.

References

  1. Gough CJR, Nolan JP. The role of adrenaline in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care. 2018;22:139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hardig BM, Gotberg M, Rundgren M, et al. Physiologic effect of repeated adrenaline (epinephrine) doses during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the cath lab setting: a randomised porcine study. Resuscitation. 2016;101:77–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, et al. Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2235–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Neumar RW, Shuster M, Callaway CW, et al. Part 1: Executive summary: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2015;3:132.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sjöberg F, Singer M. The medical use of oxygen: a time for critical reappraisal. J Intern Med. 2013;274:505–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RJ and BV drafted the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Jouffroy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional information

See related Review by Gough and Nolan https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-018-2058-1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jouffroy, R., Vivien, B. Bundle of care taking into account time to improve long-term outcome after cardiac arrest. Crit Care 22, 192 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2128-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2128-4