Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Letter
  • Open Access

Comparing fiberoptic bronchoscopy- and a tracheal tube-mounted camera-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy

Critical Care201822:30

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-1960-x

Received: 3 January 2018

Accepted: 18 January 2018

Published: 7 February 2018

The Letter to this article has been published in Critical Care 2018 22:84

In a small, prospective, randomized trial comparing fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) and an endotracheal tube-mounted camera (VivaSight TM-SL tube [VST]; ETView, Misgav, Israel) for optical guidance of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT), Grensemann et al. [1] concluded that visualization of PDT with the VST is not non-inferior to the FOB, but ventilation is superior with less hypercarbia when using the VST. We note that in the FOB group, a thick FOB with an outer diameter of 4.9 mm (Olympus BF-P60; Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used. The readers were not provided with the sizes of endotracheal tubes used in the FOB group, but placement of such a thick FOB into an adult endotracheal tube can significantly impair ventilation, especially for critically ill patients requiring PDT [2]. This may be a main reason for the inferior ventilation with more hypercarbia using FOB in this study. We argue that different results would have been obtained if a thin adult FOB, such as Olympus BF-DP with an outer diameter of 3.1 mm, was used. Furthermore, it was unclear whether a comparable fresh gas flow was used for mechanical ventilation during the PDT procedure. This could confuse the interpretation of more hypercarbia with the FOB.

For critically ill patients, the time required for the PDT procedure is the main concern. In the Methods section, Grensemann et al. did not clearly define the procedure duration. In the Results section, the authors reported that the mean procedure duration from skin incision to insertion of tracheal cannula did not differ significantly between groups. This may not be an appropriate comparison. We believe that the total procedure duration of PDT should be the time taken from insertion of direct laryngoscopy for tube exchange to completion of PDT in the VST group and from insertion of FOB to completion of PDT in the FOB group.

Finally, other than airway visualization, during the PDT procedure, the versatility of FOB can also offer invaluable advantages, such as determination of incision site, avoidance of accidental extubation, detection and management of complications, etc. [3, 4]. The recent evidence indicates that PDT combined with FOB not only is a time-saving, easy-to-operate technique with few complications, but can manage complications of posterior tracheal wall injury or perforation, tracheoesophageal fistula [5]. In the absence of high-quality evidence establishing the safety of the VST-guided PDT procedure, we believe that FOB is still the most frequently used technique for monitoring the PDT procedure while maintaining mechanical ventilation.

Notes

Abbreviations

FOB: 

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy

PDT: 

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy

VST: 

VivaSight TM-SL tube

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

FSX, CW, and YYL carefully read the manuscript by Grensemann et al. and analyzed their methods and data. FSX suggested comment points and drafted this manuscript. CW and YYL revised the comment points and this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anesthesiology, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

References

  1. Grensemann J, Eichler L, Kähler S, Jarczak D, Simon M, Pinnschmidt HO, Kluge S. Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy-a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT). Crit Care. 2017;21(1):330.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Lawson RW, Peters JI, Shelledy DC. Effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy during mechanical ventilation in a lung model. Chest. 2000;118(3):824–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Saritas A, Saritas PU, Kurnaz MM, Beyaz SG, Ergonenc T. The role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy monitoring during percutaneousdilatational tracheostomy and its routine use into tracheotomy practice. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66(1):83–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boonsarngsuk V, Kiatboonsri S, Choothakan S. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy with bronchoscopic guidance: Ramathibodi experience. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90(8):1512–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang H, Xu Y, Li H, Zhang Y, Cui L, Zhao L, Yao Q, Xie F. Application of modified percutaneous rotating dilative tracheostomy with fiberoptic bronchoscope in critical patients of ICU: a control study for four kinds of tracheostomy [Article in Chinese]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017;29(1):61–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement