Skip to content

Advertisement

Critical Care

Open Access

Age, exercise, and the outcome of sepsis

Critical Care201721:286

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1840-9

Published: 23 November 2017

The original article was published in Critical Care 2017 21:210

Abstract

We report on the increasingly important need to diagnose and care for the elderly with sepsis as a distinct patient population. We share an overview of age-related changes in sepsis physiology and the potential role of exercise.

See related research by Tyml et al., https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-017-1783-1

Keywords

SepsisSeptic shockAging and immunityImmunosenescenceExercise and infectionsSepsis in the elderly

For all the supposed benefits attributable to moderate exercise in the elderly population (better cardiovascular fitness, improved microcirculation, less obesity, etc.) [13], improved outcome from sepsis has not been listed among them until now [4]. At least in inbred, old mice, voluntary exercise appears to provide a survival benefit from experimentally induced intra-abdominal sepsis. If these results could be translated into aging human populations, the ramifications would be substantial indeed.

Sepsis is a critical issue in old age and is among the top causes for intensive care unit (ICU) admission in the elderly [5]. The incidence of sepsis in our aging population is predicted to rise precipitously in the next decade as the “baby boomer” population reaches old age. Older adults and particularly nursing home residents have higher rates of ICU admission, longer length of stay, and increased hospital mortality than younger adults [6].

The mechanism(s) underpinning the disproportionate susceptibility to sepsis in the elderly is not yet fully understood. Elderly patients are at higher risk for sepsis likely related to the higher rates of comorbidities, including dementia, poor dentition, and diabetes. With age, intact integument and physiologic reflexes (intact cough reflex, balance, and mobility) that contribute to the body’s physical defense mechanisms to infection can degrade. Additionally, institutionalization, implanted devices, and surgical procedures can predispose patients to infection [7].

All mammals age over their lifetime, manifest by gradual development of telomere shortening of chromosomes, degenerative arthritis, loss of hair, inactivity, atherosclerosis, impaired T- and B-cell responses, and age-related malignancies [7, 8]. Mice age over a 2-year lifespan rather than the typical 80-year lifespan of humans, making mice a convenient animal model to study the effects of aging on a range of pathophysiologic responses.

Elderly septic patients often do not have typical clinical responses to sepsis, making diagnosis by the Sepsis-3 quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) criteria difficult. Older patients may present with inverse signs and symptoms (hypothermia, leukopenia), or nonspecific signs of infection [6]. Accepted thresholds for biomarkers levels for diagnosis may not be appropriate in the older population, particularly among patients with pre-existing organ dysfunction. Thus, given the protean manifestations of infection in the elderly, diagnosis of sepsis is often delayed.

Once infected, older patients experience a disadvantaged host immune response with defects in humoral and cellular immune function [9]. The pattern of cytokine release during sepsis in the elderly demonstrates higher levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6 [7, 10]. A smoldering inflammatory state during aging termed “inflammaging” can affect sepsis physiology [11]. However, despite evidence of increased baseline inflammation, after insult, an immunosuppressed state is commonly observed in the elderly. This is part of the “immunosenescence” of aging, which results in quantitative and qualitative changes in lymphocytes (CD4, CD8 T cells and B cells) and myeloid cells [12, 13]. Specifically, elderly patients experience attenuated cell-mediated immunity in the form of a truncated T-cell repertoire, decreased IL-12 release, decreased lymphocyte proliferation, and dampened signal transduction. Humoral immunity is also adversely affected with aging. Decreased B-cell function with blunted antibody responses to neoantigens is commonplace due to lack of helper T-cell signals and decreased expression of costimulatory molecules [13].

Elderly mice experience many of the same age-related defects in immune function and increased risk of infection as observed in the older adult human patients [7]. Aged mice are more susceptible than young mice to endotoxin-induced systemic inflammation, and are more likely to succumb as a result of systemic infection in pneumonia models and from intra-abdominal infection following cecal ligation and puncture [8]. While it might be speculated that exercised old mice in good cardiovascular fitness might fare better in sepsis than nonexercised, aged mice, limited experimental data exist to answer this question.

A recent report now directly challenges the potential role of exercise in an isolated, controlled setting where other variables were minimized [4]. These investigators induced sepsis by an intraperitoneal injection of a fecal slurry in male, nonobese C57BL/6 mice. Exercised older mice (22 months old) had a better outcome with significantly lower systemic cytokine and chemokine response and had a less pronounced procoagulant response than nonexercised, aged mice subjected to the same infectious challenge.

Intriguingly, consistent upregulation of endogenous endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) was observed in exercised mice compared to nonexercised mice [4]. Nitric oxide is a potent vasodilator and has the capacity to limit neutrophil and platelet adherence to endothelial surfaces [14]. Exercise in older human subjects is known to improve endothelial function, increase eNOS expression, and promote microcirculatory responsiveness [15].

Like many innovative investigations, the results of this study pose more questions than they answer. Would the advantageous effects of exercise work as well in outbred mice, females (both premenopausal and postmenopausal), and how long does the protective effect of exercise last in aged mice after exercise succession? How much exercise is enough, when should it start, and is there a dose-response effect to exercise conditioning? Does exercise work better in obese or nonobese subjects? The most critical question is, of course, how well do these study findings in mice translate to improved outcomes in human sepsis? The data collected thus far in older humans indicate that while the effects of exercise on inflammatory biomarkers is measurable, the effect size is rather small and often confounded by obesity indices [13].

Should future surviving sepsis campaigns recommend daily exercise for older patients to stave off the risk of death from sepsis potentially lurking in their future? Should octogenarians be encouraged to do some daily exercise? Based on this study, one of the purported benefits might be a more constrained and appropriate host response to systemic infection.

Additional animal models would likely be needed to confirm these findings as retrospective, observational studies in humans would be susceptible to selection bias and randomized trials would be very difficult to organize. Randomly assigning people to the nonexercise group would pose an ethical challenge considering the many common benefits of light physical activity in aging populations [3]. If confirmed in further studies, we might find ourselves someday encouraging our senior citizens to prevent sepsis by giving up their rocking chairs for the exercise bike and the jogging trails.

Notes

Abbreviations

C57BL/6: 

Black 6 mouse

CD: 

Cluster of differentiation

eNOS: 

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase

ICU: 

Intensive care unit

IL: 

Interleukin

qSOFA: 

Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment

TNF: 

Tumor necrosis factor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

DB drafted this editorial. SMO edited and finalized the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA
(2)
Lifespan Hospital System, Providence, USA

References

  1. Ertek S, Cicero A. Impact of physical activity on inflammation: effects on cardiovascular diseae risk and other inflammatory conditions. Arch Med Sci. 2012;8(5):794–804.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Gondim OS, de Camargo VT N, Gutierrez FA, et al. Benefits of regular exercise on inflammatory and cardiovascular risk markers in normal weight, overweight and obese adults. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140596.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Beavers KM, Brinkley TE, Nicklas BJ. Effect of exercise training on chronic inflammation. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:785–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Tyml K, Swarbreck S, Pape C, et al. Voluntary running exercise protects against sepsis-induced early inflammatory and pro-coagulant responses in aged mice. Crit Care (London, England). 2017;21:210.Google Scholar
  5. Wier L, Pfuntner A, Steiner C. Hospital utilization among oldest adults, 2008: statistical brief #103. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006.Google Scholar
  6. Ginde AA, Moss M, Shapiro NI, Schwartz RS. Impact of older age and nursing home residence on clinical outcomes of US emergency department visits for severe sepsis. J Crit Care. 2013;28:606–11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Opal SM, Girard T, Ely EW. The immunopathogenesis of sepsis in the elderly. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:S504–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mitchell SJ, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Longo DL, de Cabo R. Animal models of aging research: implications for human aging and age-related diseases. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2015;3:283–303. doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-110829.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Inoue S, Suzuki-Utsunomiya K, Okada Y, et al. Reduction of immunocompetent T cells followed by prolonged lymphopenia in severe sepsis in the elderly. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:810–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Marik PE, Zaloga GP. The effect of aging on circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines during septic shock. Norasept II Study Investigators. J Am Geriatrics Soc. 2001;49:5–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Clifford KM, Dy-Boarman EA, Haase KK, Maxvill K, Pass SE, Alvarez CA. Challenges with diagnosing and managing sepsis in older adults. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2016;14:231–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Grubeck-Loebenstein B, Wick G. The aging of the immune system. Adv Immunol. 2002;80:243–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Starr ME, Saito H. Sepsis in old age: review of human and animal studies. Aging Dis. 2014;5:126–36.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Shu X, Keller TC, Begandt D, Butcher JT, Biwer L, Keller AS, Columbus L, Isakaon BE. Endothelial nitric oxide in the microcirculation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72(23):4561–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Puca AA, Carrizzo A, Ferrario A, Villa F, Vecchione C. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase, vascular integrity and human exceptional longevity. Immun Ageing. 2012;9:26. doi:10.1186/1742-4933-9-26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement