Open Access

Erratum to: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta versus aortic cross clamping among patients with critical trauma: a nationwide cohort study in Japan

  • Toshikazu Abe1, 2Email author,
  • Masatoshi Uchida1,
  • Isao Nagata1,
  • Daizoh Saitoh3 and
  • Nanako Tamiya1
Critical Care201721:41

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1627-z

Received: 8 February 2017

Accepted: 10 February 2017

Published: 22 February 2017

The original article was published in Critical Care 2016 20:400

Erratum

Following publication of the original article [1], it was brought to our attention that there were a few errors in Table 2:
Table 2

Outcome comparisons between REBOA and ACC

 

REBOA (n = 636)

ACC (n = 267)

P value

Disposition at discharge

<0.001*

 Died (in-hospital mortality)

405/607 (67%)

210/233 (90%)

 

 Transferred

118/607 (19%)

11/233 (4.7%)

 

 Home

83/607 (14%)

12/233 (5.2%)

 

 Other

1/607 (0.1%)

0/233 (0.0%)

 

Disposition at ED

<0.001*

 Died (ED mortality)

137/625 (22%)

130/264 (49%)

 

 ICU admission

472/625 (76%)

129/264 (49%)

 

 Ward admission

137/625 (22%)

4/264 (1.5%)

 

 Other

5/625 (1.8%)

1/264 (0.4%)

 

The variables are shown as n (%)

ACC aortic cross clamping, ED emergency department, ICU intensive care unit, REBOA resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta

*Chi-square test

CU admission should read: ICU admission

11/233 (1.8%) should read: 11/233 (4.7%)

12/233 (2.0%) should read: 12/233 (5.2%)

The corrected table is presented in this erratum [Table 2].

Furthermore, the sentence “…only 14% (83/607) of REBOA patients and 2.0% (12/233) of ACC patients could leave the hospital and go home.” in the Discussion section should as a consequence read: “…only 14% (83/607) of REBOA patients and 5.2% (12/233) of ACC patients could leave the hospital and go home.”

This has now been corrected in this erratum.

Notes

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
(2)
Department of Emergency Medicine, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital
(3)
Department of Traumatology and Emergency Medicine, National Defense Medical College

Reference

  1. Abe T, Uchida M, Nagata I, Saitoh D, Tamiya N. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta versus aortic cross clamping among patients with critical trauma: a nationwide cohort study in Japan. Crit Care. 2015;20:400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1577-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement