- Letter
- Open access
- Published:
VCO2 calorimetry: stop tossing stones, it’s time for building!
Critical Care volume 20, Article number: 399 (2016)
We followed with interest the discussion [1, 2] fueled by the study of Stapel et al. [3] who reported fairly accurate assessment of energy expenditure (EE) in critically ill patients based on ventilator-derived carbon dioxide production (VCO2). The proposed technique is elegant and valid but has inherent limitations. It is applicable in patients who are in one way or another ventilator-dependent but not in spontaneously breathing yet oxygen-dependent subjects. We concur that VO2 is the most relevant variable for EE measurement. However, the most accurate and precise estimation of EE in a critically ill population can only be obtained by sampling of inspired and expired oxygen/carbon dioxide concentrations and measuring expired gas flow. This is the core task of indirect calorimetry [4].
Initiative has been undertaken to develop a ‘full option’, easy-to-use, accurate, and affordable indirect calorimeter. The project is supported by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition [5] and has actually reached Technology Readiness Level. It is probably only a matter of time before such a device will render all current mathematical uproar obsolete.
Abbreviations
- EE:
-
Energy expenditure
- VCO2 :
-
Carbon dioxide production
References
Singer P. Simple equations for complex physiology: can we use VCO2 for calculating energy expenditure? Crit Care. 2016;20:72.
Pielmeier U, Andreassen S. VCO2 calorimetry is a convenient method for improved assessment of energy expenditure in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2016;20:224.
Stapel SN, de Grooth HJS, Alimohamad H, Elbers PW, Girbes AR, Weijs PJ, et al. Ventilator-derived carbon dioxide production to assess energy expenditure in critically ill patients: proof of concept. Crit Care. 2015;19:370.
Frankenfield DC. On heat, respiration, and calorimetry. Nutrition. 2010;26(10):939–50.
Oshima T, Berger MM, De Waele E, Guttormsen AB, Heidegger CP, Hiesmayr M, et al., A position paper by the ICALIC study group. Indirect calorimetry in nutritional therapy. Clin Nutr. 2016;(16):30142-X.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The authors declare that they have received no external funding.
Availability of data and materials
Not appropriate.
Authors’ contributions
EDW designed the paper; EDW, PMH, and HDS participated in drafting the manuscript, and have read and approved the final version.
Authors’ information
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Not appropriate.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not appropriate.
Clinical trial registration
Not appropriate.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
See related research by Stapel et al. http://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-015-1087-2
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
De Waele, E., Honoré, P.M. & Spapen, H.D. VCO2 calorimetry: stop tossing stones, it’s time for building!. Crit Care 20, 399 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1575-z
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1575-z