Open Access

The value of poly-urethane cuffed endotracheal tubes

Critical Care201620:290

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1474-3

Published: 30 September 2016

The original article was published in Critical Care 2016 20:203

I read with special interest the meta-analysis of Blot et al. in a recent issue of Critical Care [1]. In a systematic review of the available literature of both laboratory and clinical studies, comparing the sealing efficacy of poly-vinylchloride cuffed endotracheal tubes (PVC-ET) versus poly-urethane cuffed endotracheal tubes (PU-ET), they demonstrated a clear advantage with a demonstrated delay of chance of descent of oropharyngeal secretions when a PU-ET was used. However, prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia could not be demonstrated in the overall data.

The characteristics of the PU cuff allow better expansion of the cuff within the trachea, in comparison with the thicker material of PVC. In a recent re-analysis of the initial data [2], we demonstrated that a clear benefit of the PU-ET is obvious after 16.6 h if patients are treated in a comparable manner with tidal volume 6 ml/kg, PEEP 7–8 cmH2O, and positioned in 30–40° inclined position postoperatively [3]. Furthermore, in longer term ventilated ICU patients, intubated with PU-ET, condensation fluid is sometimes present within the cuff (unpublished data), abolishing proper assessment of cuff pressure. The latter could be one of the reasons why no clear advantage is found in mechanical ventilated ICU patients. In addition, we demonstrated that, indeed, micro-aspiration still occurs with PU-ET, but is retarded for several hours [4]. This phenomenon is also suggested in in-vitro studies [5].

Another important issue which has not been discussed is the proper choice of the size of the ET. There is a clear tendency in clinical anesthesia practice to decrease the size of the ET to 8 mm internal diameter (ID) for male and 7 mm ID for female patients. This allows a theoretical improved expansion of the cuff, with a consequent decline of pleas and channels in the PVC cuffs; whether this reduction in size leads to improved sealing has still to be demonstrated.

Several open questions remain unanswered. Though there are some arguments in favor of the use of PU-ET, we still have to wait for the demonstration of a clear delay of onset of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Notes

Abbreviations

ET: 

Endotracheal tube

ID: 

Internal diameter

PU-ET: 

Poly-urethane cuffed endotracheal tube

PVC-ET: 

Poly-vinylchloride cuffed endotracheal tube

Declarations

Funding

Only departmental funding is present.

Author’s contribution

JP wrote and conceived the manuscript/text.

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Approved.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University Hospital Brussels
(2)
Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, VUB

References

  1. Blot SI, Rello J, Koulenti D. The value of polyurethane-cuffed endotracheal tubes to reduce microaspiration and intubation-related pneumonia: a systematic review of laboratory and clinical studies. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):203.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Poelaert J, Depuydt P, De Wolf A, Van de Velde S, Herck I, Blot S. Polyurethane cuffed endotracheal tubes to prevent early postoperative pneumonia after cardiac surgery: a pilot study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135(4):771–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Poelaert J, Haentjens P, Blot S. Association among duration of mechanical ventilation, cuff material of endotracheal tube, and postoperative nosocomial pneumonia in cardiac surgical patients: a prospective study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(4):1622–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. D’Haese J, De Keukeleire T, Remory I, Van Rompaey K, Umbrain V, Poelaert J. Assessment of intraoperative microaspiration: does a modified cuff shape improve sealing? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57(7):873–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zanella A, Scaravilli V, Isgrò S, Milan M, Cressoni M, Patroniti N, Fumagalli R, Pesenti A. Fluid leakage across tracheal tube cuff, effect of different cuff material, shape, and positive expiratory pressure: a bench-top study. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(2):343–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement