Skip to main content

Erratum to: ‘Neutrophil CD64 expression as a diagnostic marker for sepsis in adult patients: a meta-analysis’

The Original Article was published on 01 December 2015

Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained an error. A sentence in the statistical analysis section was written incorrectly. It was written wrongly as:

“If there was significant heterogeneity, we choose a fixed model; if there was no heterogeneity, we choose a random model.”

The correct form of this sentence is:

“If there was significant heterogeneity, we choose a random model; if there was no heterogeneity, we choose a fixed model.”

Reference

  1. Wang X, Li ZY, Zeng L, Zhang AQ, Pan W, Gu W, Jiang JX. Neutrophil CD64 expression as a diagnostic marker for sepsis in adult patients: a meta-analysis. Critical Care. 2015;19:245.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Gu or Jian-Xin Jiang.

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0972-z.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Li, ZY., Zeng, L. et al. Erratum to: ‘Neutrophil CD64 expression as a diagnostic marker for sepsis in adult patients: a meta-analysis’. Crit Care 20, 172 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1357-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1357-7