Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Erratum to: Multiple imputation is better than KDIGO guidelines for estimating unknown baseline renal function

Critical Care201620:194

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1317-2

Received: 22 April 2016

Accepted: 22 April 2016

Published: 17 June 2016

The original article was published in Critical Care 2016 20:105

Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] was publishing without its corresponding author response and associated references included. This has now been corrected in the original article.

Notes

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Intensive Care Unit, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Reference

  1. Jamme M, Geri G. Multiple imputation is better than KDIGO guidelines for estimating unknown baseline renal function. Critical Care 2016;20(105):1.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Jamme and Geri. 2016

Advertisement