Skip to main content

Erratum to: Multiple imputation is better than KDIGO guidelines for estimating unknown baseline renal function

Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] was publishing without its corresponding author response and associated references included. This has now been corrected in the original article.

Reference

  1. 1.

    Jamme M, Geri G. Multiple imputation is better than KDIGO guidelines for estimating unknown baseline renal function. Critical Care 2016;20(105):1.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthieu Jamme.

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1281-x.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jamme, M., Geri, G. Erratum to: Multiple imputation is better than KDIGO guidelines for estimating unknown baseline renal function. Crit Care 20, 194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1317-2

Download citation