- Erratum
- Open access
- Published:
Erratum to: Multiple imputation is better than KDIGO guidelines for estimating unknown baseline renal function
Critical Care volume 20, Article number: 194 (2016)
The Original Article was published on 15 April 2016
Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] was publishing without its corresponding author response and associated references included. This has now been corrected in the original article.
Reference
Jamme M, Geri G. Multiple imputation is better than KDIGO guidelines for estimating unknown baseline renal function. Critical Care 2016;20(105):1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1281-x.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Jamme, M., Geri, G. Erratum to: Multiple imputation is better than KDIGO guidelines for estimating unknown baseline renal function. Crit Care 20, 194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1317-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1317-2