Open Access

Updates in the perioperative and emergency management of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants

  • David Faraoni1Email author,
  • Jerrold H Levy2,
  • Pierre Albaladejo3,
  • Charles-Marc Samama4 and
  • and the Groupe d’Intérêt en Hémostase Périopératoire
Critical Care201519:203

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0930-9

Published: 29 April 2015

Abstract

Perioperative management of patients treated with the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is an ongoing challenge. Due to the lack of good clinical studies involving adequate monitoring and reversal therapies, management requires knowledge and understanding of pharmacokinetics, renal function, drug interactions, and evaluation of the surgical bleeding risk. Consideration of the benefit of reversal of anticoagulation is important and, for some low risk bleeding procedures, it may be in the patient’s interest to continue anticoagulation. In case of major intra-operative bleeding in patients likely to have therapeutic or supra-therapeutic levels of anticoagulation, specific reversal agents/antidotes would be of value but are currently lacking. As a consequence, a multimodal approach should be taken which includes the administration of 25 to 50 U/kg 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrates or 30 to 50 U/kg activated prothrombin complex concentrate (FEIBA®) in some life-threatening situations. Finally, further studies are needed to clarify the ideal therapeutic intervention.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: new challenges

Direct thrombin inhibitors, dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa®, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany), and direct factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban (Xarelto®, Johnson and Johnson/Bayer HealthCare AG, Leverkusen, Germany) and apixaban (Eliquis®, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Uxbridge, UK), are non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) increasingly used in the treatment of venous thromboembolism, prevention of cerebrovascular embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation, and thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery [1]. Although the advantages of these new agents include rapid onset (2 to 4 hours) of action, in addition to a predictable anticoagulant effect without monitoring requirements, different clinical conditions can impair their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics [2]. Despite published management perspectives, strategies are not yet clearly defined for perioperative management in patients treated with NOACs.

However, a consistent finding is that NOACs may have a lower bleeding risk. A recent report that included 27,419 patients treated for 6 to 36 months with dabigatran or warfarin reported that 1,034 patients had 1,121 major bleeding episodes during treatment or within 3 days of temporary or permanent discontinuation of anticoagulation [3]. The 30-day mortality after the first major bleed was 9.1% in the dabigatran group compared with 13.0% in the warfarin group, and dabigatran-treated patients required a shorter ICU stay compared with that in warfarin-treated patients. Using data from a prospective, non-interventional registry (The Dresden NOAC registry (NCT01588119), Dresden, Germany), including patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the region of Dresden in Germany, Beyer-Westendorf and colleagues [4] analyzed rates, management, and outcome of rivaroxaban-related bleeding. From 1,776 patients treated with rivaroxaban, 762 patients (42.9%) experienced 1,082 bleeding episodes within 3 days of discontinuation. Most episodes were classified as minor (58.9%), but 35.0% experienced clinically relevant bleeding, and 6.1% had major bleeding. The rates of major bleeding per 100 patient-years were 3.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6 to 4.4) for all patients, 3.1 (95% CI 2.2 to 4.3) for patients anticoagulated in the context of atrial fibrillation, and 4.1 (95% CI 2.5 to 6.4) for venous thromboembolism prevention. In case of major bleeding, surgical or interventional treatment was needed in 37.8% and prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) were administered in 9.1%. These results indicate that, in real life, rates of rivaroxaban-related major bleeding may be lower than with vitamin K antagonists (15 to 20%), and the outcome may, at least, not be worse.

In approximately 25% of patients receiving NOACs, treatment was interrupted at least once for surgery or another invasive procedure [5,6]. In addition, managing anticoagulation in the perioperative period is problematic because all anticoagulants can cause bleeding [7]. Despite their apparent safety compared with warfarin, perioperative management of patients treated with NOACs is now a routine challenge. In a recent international survey, we observed that physicians had limited knowledge about the perioperative management of patients treated with NOACs, and the management of emergency procedures [8]. The goal of this article is to briefly review current evidence, and propose an algorithm based on published information for the perioperative management of patients treated with NOACs.

Preoperative management of patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants

Preoperative management of patients treated with NOACs will be influenced by different factors that include: (i) the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the drug and the possible interaction with other treatments; (ii) patient comorbidities, especially renal function; and (iii) factors related to surgery considering both the timing (elective or urgent) and the bleeding risk of the procedure.

Dabigatran etexilate is a prodrug converted to an active component, dabigatran, after an esterase-mediated hydrolysis. This drug has a very low bio-availability (3 to 7%), and has a major renal mechanism for elimination (approximately 80%). Direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban) are primarily metabolized by the liver (65 to 70%), although renal excretion is also present. Clinicians should consider that the half-life of the three drugs is close to 12 hours in most patients [9]. Dabigatran elimination is most influenced by renal function, and preoperative interruption should be based on creatinine clearance (CrCl) calculated according to the Cockcroft and Gault formula [10]. Patients with moderate renal impairment (CrCl of 30 to 50 ml/minute) demonstrated >2-fold higher plasma levels compared with subjects with normal renal function (CrCl >80 ml/minute) [11]. Although the bleeding risk reported in the RE-LY trial was lower with dabigatran in the presence of normal renal function, the rates of major bleeding were higher as renal function deteriorated [12]. Renal function is less an issue with rivaroxaban and apixaban until severe renal insufficiency occurs [13]. Drug interactions are less important with NOACs than vitamin K antagonists, but the following interactions are relevant: aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, P-glycoprotein inhibitors (for example, amiodarone), CYP3A4 inhibitors (for example, phenotiazin), or inducers (for example, alcohol, carbamazepine) are at increased risk of abnormal metabolism. Notably, more than 40% of the targeted population, aged >75 years old, receive at least one of these drugs [14].

Different groups have published recommendations for perioperative management [15-19]. As recently recommended by the European Society of Cardiology [9], surgical procedures should be classified in three different categories: (i) interventions not requiring discontinuation of anticoagulation (for example, dental, ophthalmology, and superficial surgeries); (ii) intervention with low bleeding risk (for example, prostate or bladder biopsy, angiography, pacemaker implementation); or (iii) intervention with high bleeding risk (spinal or epidural anesthesia, lumbar diagnostic puncture, cardiothoracic surgery, abdominal surgery, major orthopedic surgery, liver biopsy, transurethral prostate resection, and kidney biopsy). Based on these guidelines [9,16,18], the three NOACs currently available should be stopped 24 hours before surgery with a low bleeding risk, and at least 48 hours and up to 96 hours before surgery with a high bleeding risk. In case of severe renal impairment (CrCl <30 ml/minute), interruption of direct factor Xa inhibitors should be delayed to 48 hours. For dabigatran, delays should be progressively prolonged based on CrCl (Figure 1) and potential laboratory testing should be considered to determine residual effects of the agents. It is important to mention that the use of dabigatran in patients with severe renal impairment (CrCl <30 ml/minute) is not recommended. Another way to manage these agents is to define a more conservative approach and to recommend the same interruption period for all the NOACs. With this approach, interruption should be 4 days in all patients and, in some cases (elderly, severe renal insufficiency), the interruption should approach 5 days. Additional studies are needed to optimize perioperative management.
Figure 1

Proposed algorithm for peri-operative management of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. CrCl, creatinine clearance; LMWH, low molecular weight heparin; NA, not applicable; NOAC, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate; TE, thromboembolism.

In another analysis from the Dresden registry, Beyer-Westendorf and colleagues [6] assessed the management and the safety of perioperative NOAC use in 2,179 patients, of which 595 underwent 863 surgical procedures. Major cardiovascular events and major bleeding complications were low (1.0 and 1.2% after major procedures). Preoperative heparin bridging did not reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events, but was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding compared with the ‘no-bridging’ approach, especially in patients who underwent major procedures. This study reported that a short preoperative interruption was safe in patients who underwent either minor or major procedures. In case of major procedures, bridging therapy was not associated with a decreased incidence of cardiovascular event, while it significantly increased the bleeding risk. However, the benefit should always be balanced with the thromboembolic risk in high-risk patients. The role of additional coagulation testing, either specific (diluted thrombin time or specific anti-Xa activity) or non-specific (for example, activated partial thromboplastin time, and prothrombin time (PT)), in the preoperative management of NOACs for elective procedures needs to be determined.

Managing patients that require an emergency surgical procedure is an ongoing challenge. The timing between the last intake and the incident should be checked. Specific tests for NOACs effects are important to consider, and normal standard coagulation tests, PT or activated partial thromboplastin time, may not exclude the presence of clinically relevant concentrations of NOACs [20]. The effects of dabigatran can be assessed using specific diluted thrombin times (Haemoclot®) and direct factor Xa inhibitors require specific antifactor-Xa assays which are now available in the market. For both tests, results are expressed as ng/ml [21,22]. In recent published proposals, Pernod and colleagues and the GIHP group (Groupe d’Intérêt en Hémostase Périopératoire) [23] suggested that the measurement of the NOACs plasma concentration should be considered as the best way to assess the residual activity of the drug and to estimate the bleeding risk. If the plasma concentration is below 30 ng/ml, the surgery could be safely performed. Between 30 and 200 ng/ml, surgery should be delayed for at least 12 hours and testing repeated each 12 hours until the concentration reaches a safe level (<30 ng/ml). At concentration between 200 and 400 ng/ml, surgery should be delayed a minimal period of 24 hours. In patients with renal dysfunction treated with dabigatran, the relationship between concentration thresholds and time delays based on pharmacokinetics may be inaccurate. Dabigatran levels >400 ng/ml pose a major risk of uncontrollable hemorrhage, and hemodialysis should be considered. In the context of emergency procedures, the benefit associated with a surgery performed within a short delay should be balanced with the risk of major hemorrhage.

Postoperative anticoagulation

Postoperative management of NOACs should be considered as restarting any anticoagulation agent in this setting. With appropriate hemostasis, NOACs potentially can be resumed 6 to 8 hours after minor procedures [9]. However, restarting full dose anticoagulation shortly after a procedure may increase the risk of postoperative bleeding. If this risk outweighs the risk of thromboembolic complication, full dose anticoagulation might be resumed 48 or 72 hours after the procedure [24]. In case of immobilization and increased risk of thromboembolic complication, thromboprophylaxis using low molecular weight heparins or unfractionated heparin should be started within 6 to 8 postoperative hours, whereas therapeutic anticoagulation with NOACs should be delayed for 48 to 72 hours after the procedure (Figure 1). Following major orthopedic surgery it may be appropriate to use prophylactic doses of NOACs until the patient can resume full dose anticoagulation.

Intraoperative or postoperative bleeding management

There is limited information on the management of bleeding events in patients treated with NOACs. In a recent review of animal and human studies, Lee and colleagues [25] reported that although more than 15 trials assessed the effect of different treatment strategies to reverse the effect of NOACs, only two were performed in human volunteers, concluding that most of our experience came from animal bleeding models. In 2011, Eerenberg and colleagues [26] reported that administration of PCCs in healthy volunteers who received dabigatran 150 mg twice in one day improved laboratory parameters (PT and thrombin generation) but did not restore them to baseline. In another study performed in healthy volunteers, the authors reported that for both dabigatran and rivaroxaban, lower doses of activated PCCs (FEIBA® Baxter Healthcare, Westlake Village, CA,USA) appeared to be able to reverse the anticoagulant activity ex vivo in blood samples [27]. Although attempts were made to restore anticoagulant-induced bleeding using non-specific reversal agents, the current literature is suboptimal and clinical evaluations are needed regarding hemorrhagic situations. Only a few cases reported the efficacy of PCCs for urgent reversal of dabigatran in emergency situations [28].

Actually, preclinical data suggest that both prothrombin complex concentrates (three- or four-factor PCCs, 25 to 100 U/kg) and activated PCCs (FEIBA®, 20–80 U/kg), and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa 90 μg/kg) can potentially correct the anticoagulation in case of massive bleeding after application of standard therapies (for example, fluid replacement, tranexamic acid) [29-33]. In a recent study performed in healthy volunteers, Levi and colleagues [34] confirmed that after receiving 4 days of rivaroxaban 20 mg twice in one day to obtain supra-therapeutic steady-state concentrations, both three- and four-factor PCCs partially reversed the anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban in healthy adults. Administration of either the four-factor PCCs or the three-factor PCCs was safe and well tolerated, with no signs of thromboembolic events. Although discrepancy was reported between the effects of the two products on coagulation assays, the different effect observed for PT and thrombin generation are currently unclear.

Based on current literature, mainly from animal experimentations and preclinical studies, the off-label therapeutic use of both non-activated PCC (20 to 50 U/kg) and activated PCC (FEIBA®, 30 to 50 U/kg) may be considered for bleeding management in patients likely to have therapeutic or supra-therapeutic levels of NOACs (Figure 1) [35], although FEIBA®, and its high potential to overshoot thrombin generation, might be more effective in case of life-threatening bleeding; this benefit might be balanced with an increased risk of thrombosis [36]. Considering that no benefit was reported with the administration of rFVIIa alone, while this component could also be associated with a significant increase in the incidence of fatal thromboembolic complication [37], there is no evidence to support the use of rFVIIa.

Further specific antidotes are currently under development and will probably solve the issue of bleeding management [38,39]. Although hemodialysis could be an option in case of dabigatran-induced hemorrhage, little evidence exists and this solution should be limited to overdose with an increased risk of life-threatening hemorrhage [40]. In a recent study, Wang and colleagues reported that activated charcoal decreased the mean half-live of apixaban to 5 hours when charcoal was administered within 6 hours after the ingestion of the drug [41]. In the British Committee for Standards in Haematology guidelines, the administration of oral activated charcoal was recommended in bleeding patients who have taken a dose of dabigatran in the last 2 hours [19]. This short delay limits its use in our clinical practice.

Conclusion

Perioperative management of patients treated with NOACs is an ongoing challenge. Specific recommendations have been made regarding management, but again are based on expert opinion (Figure 1). Due to the lack of good clinical studies involving adequate monitoring and reversal therapies, management requires knowledge and understanding of pharmacokinetics, renal function, drug interactions, and evaluation of the surgical bleeding risk. Consideration of the benefit of reversal of anticoagulation is important and for some low risk bleeding procedures it may be in the patient’s interest to continue anticoagulation. In case of major intra-operative bleeding where anticoagulation is thought to contribute substantially to the bleeding, standard therapy should include a multimodal approach including the administration of 25 to 50 U/kg four-factor PCCs or 30/50 U/kg activated PCCs (FEIBA®). Specific reversal agents/antidotes would be of value but are currently lacking. Finally, further studies are needed to clarify the ideal therapeutic intervention.

Abbreviations

CI: 

Confidence interval

CrCl: 

Creatinine clearance

NOAC: 

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant

PCC: 

Prothrombin complex concentrate

PT: 

Prothrombin time

rFVIIa: 

recombinant activated factor VII

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are members of the 'Groupe d’Intérêt en Hémostase Périopératoire' (GIHP) Consists of Pierre Albaladejo, Samia Jebara, Annick Steib, Anne Godier, Gilles Pernod, Sylvain Belisle, Normand Blais, Fanny Bonhomme, Annie Borel-Derlon, Jeanne-Yvonne Borg, Jean-Luc Bosson, Jean-Philippe Collet, Emmanuel De Maistre, Philippe De Moerloose, Pierre Fontana, Yves Gruel, Joanne Guay, Yann Huet, Brigitte Ickx, Brigitte Jude, Dominique Lasne, Dan Longrois, Jean-François Hardy, Emmanuel Marret, Patrick Mismetti, Serge Motte, Nathalie Nathan, Nadia Rosencher, Charles Marc Samama, Laurence Jesel-Morel, Jean-Francois Schved, Sylvie Schlumberger, Pierre Sie, Sophie Susen, Philippe Van der Linden, André Vincentelli, Paul Zufferey, Ariel Cohen, Juan V. Llau Pitarch, Eric Vanbelle, Gregoire Legal, Sylvie Laporte, Thomas Pierre Lecompte, Yves Ozier, Philippe Nguyen, Stephanie Roullet, David Faraoni

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anesthesiology, Peri-operative and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School
(2)
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Duke University School of Medicine
(3)
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Grenoble University Hospital
(4)
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, Cochin University Hospital

References

  1. Levy JH, Key NS, Azran MS. Novel oral anticoagulants: implications in the perioperative setting. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:726–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Levy JH, Faraoni D, Spring JL, Douketis JD, Samama CM. Managing new oral anticoagulants in the perioperative and intensive care unit setting. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:1466–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Majeed A, Hwang HG, Connolly SJ, Eikelboom JW, Ezekowitz MD, Wallentin L, et al. Management and outcomes of major bleeding during treatment with dabigatran or warfarin. Circulation. 2013;128:2325–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beyer-Westendorf J, Forster K, Pannach S, Ebertz F, Gelbricht V, Thieme C, et al. Rates, management and outcome of bleeding complications during rivaroxaban therapy in daily care: results from the Dresden NOAC registry. Blood. 2014;124:955–62.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Healey JS, Eikelboom J, Douketis J, Wallentin L, Oldgren J, Yang S, et al. Periprocedural bleeding and thromboembolic events with dabigatran compared with warfarin: results from the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) randomized trial. Circulation. 2012;126:343–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Beyer-Westendorf J, Gelbricht V, Förster K, Ebertz F, Köhler C, Werth S, et al. Peri-interventional management of novel oral anticoagulants in daily care: results from the prospective Dresden NOAC registry. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:1888–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Levy JH. Role of coagulation factor concentrates for reversing dabigatran-related anticoagulation. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:1316–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Faraoni D, Samama CM, Ranucci M, Dietrich W, Levy J. Perioperative management of new oral anticoagulants: an international survey. Clinics Lab Med. 2014;34:637–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, Antz M, Hacke W, Oldgren J, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association practical guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2013;15:625–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Stangier J, Rathgen K, Stähle H, Mazur D. Influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral dabigatran etexilate: an open-label, parallel-group, single-centre study. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49:259–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Reilly PA, Lehr T, Haertter S, Connolly SJ, Yusuf S, Eikelboom JW, et al. The effect of dabigatran plasma concentrations and patient characteristics on the frequency of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients: the RE-LY trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:321–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hijazi Z, Hohnloser SH, Oldgren J, Andersson U, Connolly SJ, Eikelboom JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin in relation to baseline renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation: a RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial analysis. Circulation. 2014;129:961–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kubitza D, Becka M, Mueck W, Halabi A, Maatouk H, Klause N, et al. Effects of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;70:703–12.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jungbauer L, Dobias C, Stöllberger C, Weidinger F. The frequency of prescription of P-glycoprotein-affecting drugs in atrial fibrillation. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:2069–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kozek-Langenecker SA, Afshari A, Albaladejo P, Santullano CA, De Robertis E, Filipescu DC, et al. Management of severe perioperative bleeding: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30:270–382.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sié P, Samama CM, Godier A, Rosencher N, Steib A, Llau JV, et al. Surgery and invasive procedures in patients on long-term treatment with direct oral anticoagulants: thrombin or factor-Xa inhibitors. Recommendations of the Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis and the French Study Group on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;106:382–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Baron TH, Kamath PS, McBane RD. Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing invasive procedures. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2113–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferrandis R, Castillo J, de Andres J, Gomar C, Gomez-Luque A, Hidalgo F, et al. The perioperative management of new direct oral anticoagulants: a question without answers. Thromb Haemost. 2013;110:515–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Makris M, Van Veen JJ, Tait CR, Mumford AD, Laffan M. British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guideline on the management of bleeding in patients on antithrombotic agents. Br J Haematol. 2013;160:35–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lazo-Langner A, Lang ES, Douketis J. Clinical review: Clinical management of new oral anticoagulants: a structured review with emphasis on the reversal of bleeding complications. Crit Care. 2013;17:230.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hawes EM, Deal AM, Funk-Adcock D, Gosselin R, Jeanneret C, Cook AM, et al. Performance of coagulation tests in patients on therapeutic doses of dabigatran: a cross-sectional pharmacodynamic study based on peak and trough plasma levels. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11:1493–502.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Becker RC, Yang H, Barrett Y, Mohan P, Wang J, Wallentin L, et al. Chromogenic laboratory assays to measure the factor Xa-inhibiting properties of apixaban - an oral, direct and selective factor Xa inhibitor. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2011;32:183–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pernod G, Albaladejo P, Godier A, Samama CM, Susen S, Gruel Y, et al. Management of major bleeding complications and emergency surgery in patients on long-term treatment with direct oral anticoagulants, thrombin or factor-Xa inhibitors: proposals of the Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) - March 2013. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;106:382–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM, Karanicolas PJ, Arcelus JI, Heit JA, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis. 9th edn: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;14:e227S–77S.Google Scholar
  25. Lee FM, Chan AK, Lau KK, Chan HH. Reversal of new, factor-specific oral anticoagulants by rFVIIa, prothrombin complex concentrate and activated prothrombin complex concentrate: a review of animal and human studies. Thromb Res. 2014;133:705–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Eerenberg ES, Kamphuisen PW, Sijpkens MK, Meijers JC, Buller HR, Levi M. Reversal of rivaroxaban and dabigatran by prothrombin complex concentrate: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy subjects. Circulation. 2011;124:1573–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Marlu R, Hodaj E, Paris A, Albaladejo P, Cracowski JL, Pernod G. Effect of non-specific reversal agents on anticoagulant activity of dabigatran and rivaroxaban: a randomised crossover ex vivo study in healthy volunteers. Thromb Haemost. 2012;108:217–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Díaz MQ, Borobia AM, Núñez MAR, Virto AMM, Fabra S, Casado MS, et al. Use of prothrombin complex concentrates for urgent reversal of dabigatran in the Emergency Department. Haematologica. 2013;98:e143–4.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pragst I, Zeitler SH, Doerr B, Kaspereit FJ, Herzog E, Dickneite G, et al. Reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation by prothrombin complex concentrate (Beriplex P/N) in a rabbit model. J Thrombos Haemost. 2012;10:1841–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Godier A, Miclot A, Le Bonniec B, Durand M, Fischer AM, Emmerich J, et al. Evaluation of prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated factor VII to reverse rivaroxaban in a rabbit model. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:94–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Perzborn E, Gruber A, Tinel H, Marzec UM, Buetehorn U, Buchmueller A, et al. Reversal of rivaroxaban anticoagulation by haemostatic agents in rats and primates. Thromb Haemost. 2013;110:162–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin AC, Le Bonniec B, Fischer AM, Marchand-Leroux C, Gaussem P, Samama CM, et al. Evaluation of recombinant activated factor VII, prothrombin complex concentrate, and fibrinogen concentrate to reverse apixaban in a rabbit model of bleeding and thrombosis. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:4228–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhou W, Schwarting S, Illanes S, Liesz A, Middelhoff M, Zorn M, et al. Hemostatic therapy in experimental intracerebral hemorrhage associated with the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. Stroke. 2011;42:3594–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Levi M, Moore K, Castillejos C, Kubitza D, Berkowitz S, Goldhaber S, et al. Comparison of three- and four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates on the anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban in healthy volunteers. J Thromb Haemost. 2014;12:1428–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Levy JH, Spyropoulos AC, Samama CM, Douketis J. Direct oral anticoagulants. New drugs and new concepts. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:1333–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Dickneite G, Hoffman M. Reversing the new oral anticoagulants with prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs): what is the evidence? Thromb Haemost. 2014;111:189–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Levi M, Levy JH, Andersen HF, Truloff D. Safety of recombinant activated factor VII in randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1791–800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Schiele F, van Ryn J, Canada K, Newsome C, Sepulveda E, Park J, et al. A specific antidote for dabigatran: functional and structural characterization. Blood. 2013;121:3554–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Grottke O, van Ryn J, Spronk HM, Rossaint R. Prothrombin complex concentrates and a specific antidote to dabigatran are effective ex-vivo in reversing the effects of dabigatran in an anticoagulation/liver trauma experimental model. Crit Care. 2014;18:R27.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Khadzhynov D, Wagner F, Formella S, Wiegert E, Moschetti V, Slowinski T, et al. Effective elimination of dabigatran by haemodialysis. A phase I single-centre study in patients with end-stage renal disease. Thromb Haemost. 2013;109:596–605.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang X, Mondal S, Wang J, Tirucherai G, Zhang D, Boyd RA, et al. Effect of activated charcoal on apixaban pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2014;14:147–54.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Faraoni et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.