Skip to main content

Clinical solutions: not always what they seem?

Brenner and colleagues [1], in their article published in Critical Care, showed elevated levels of the reactive carbonyl species (RCS) methylglyoxal (MG) in the circulation of patients with septic shock. We commend the authors’ bravery in launching this molecule into a field well-populated with biomarkers and where clinical diagnosis persists as the ‘gold standard’ [2].

The authors hypothesised that MG accumulation resulted from metabolic dysregulation and oxidative stress associated with septic shock. Impairment of MG detoxification was also proposed as a contributory factor. However, whether MG was, at least in part, inadvertently administered during routine clinical care appears not to have been considered.

Some clinical solutions, such as peritoneal dialysis fluid, are known to contain MG and other RCS [3,4]. Bearing in mind that patients with septic shock, managed on intensive care units, typically receive large volumes of intravenous fluids and, in due course, enteral (and parenteral) nutrition, could these solutions not also be a source of MG and other RCS? Also, 25% of the septic shock patients in Benner and colleagues’ study [1] had acute liver failure, and such patients often require infusions of high concentration dextrose, a further potential source of RCS. Given the growing awareness that clinical solutions are not always what they seem, we would suggest that measurements of MG and other RCS levels in solutions administered to patients with sepsis could be a helpful and perhaps an illuminative and valuable addition not only to this study but to the sepsis shock/intensive care field in general.

Abbreviations

MG:

Methylglyoxal

RCS:

Reactive carbonyl species

References

  1. 1.

    Brenner T, Fleming T, Uhle F, Silaff S, Schmitt F, Salgado E, et al. Methylglyoxal as a new biomarker in patients with septic shock: an observational clinical study. Crit Care. 2014;18:683.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Prucha M, Bellingan G, Zazula R. Sepsis biomarkers. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;440c:97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hirahara I, Kusano E, Yanagiba S, Miyata Y, Ando Y, Muto S, et al. Peritoneal injury by methylglyoxal in peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2006;26:380–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Inagi R, Miyata T, Ueda Y, Yoshino A, Nangaku M, van Ypersele Strihou de C, et al. Efficient in vitro lowering of carbonyl stress by the glyoxalase system in conventional glucose peritoneal dialysis fluid. Kidney Int. 2002;62:679–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Burke-Gaffney.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Both authors contributed equally to the composition of this letter.

See related research by Brenner et al., http://ccforum.com/content/18/6/683

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burke-Gaffney, A., Creagh-Brown, B.C. Clinical solutions: not always what they seem?. Crit Care 19, 213 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0870-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Intensive Care Unit
  • Septic Shock
  • Peritoneal Dialysis
  • Clinical Care
  • Dextrose