Open Access

Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: pre-emptive, appropriate antibiotic therapy recommended

Critical Care201418:627

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0627-5

Published: 19 November 2014

Abstract

Nseir and colleagues presented data from a large multicenter study of patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT), demonstrating that appropriate antibiotic therapy for VAT was an independent predictor for reducing transition to pneumonia (ventilator-associated pneumonia, or VAP). These data added to the growing evidence supporting the use of appropriate antibiotic therapy for VAT as a standard of care to prevent VAP and improve patient outcomes.

Introduction

In a previous issue of Critical Care, Nseir and colleagues [1] presented interesting data demonstrating that appropriate antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) reduced transition to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Of the 122 study patients, 8.1% developed VAT, of whom 13.9% later developed VAP. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Acinetobacter baumannii were the most common pathogens isolated. In the multivariable analysis, appropriate antibiotic therapy was the only risk factor independently associated with reduced risk of transition to VAP (P =0.009).

Previous studies have demonstrated that patients diagnosed with VAT or VAP (or both) have increased ventilator days, length of ICU stay, and associated health-care costs [2]-[6]. Patients with VAT or VAP present with elevated temperature, leukocytosis, purulent sputum with many polymorphonuclear leukocytes on Gram stain, plus an endotracheal aspirate (ETA) culture having >10 moderate (+++) semi-quantitative growth, or a quantitative culture having at least 100,000 (at least 105) organisms per milliliter of a bacterial pathogen [5],[7]. However, VAP also requires a new and persistent infiltrate on chest x-ray. The fact that 10% to 30% of patients with VAT progress to VAP makes VAT an ideal target for antibiotic therapy to prevent VAP and improve patient outcomes [5],[7],[8]. Intravenous or aerosolized antibiotic therapy (or both) for VAT has been shown to reduce VAP, ventilator days, and length of ICU stay [3],[4],[9],[10].

Bouza and colleagues [8] compared use of pre-emptive antibiotic therapy versus controls to prevent VAT and VAP in high-risk patients following major heart surgery. Forty patients were randomly assigned to a 3-day course of linezolid and meropenem versus 38 control patients followed for development of VAT, VAP or both. The antibiotic-treated group had significantly lower rates of VAT/VAP, 32/1,000 days versus controls 65/1,000 days (P <0.03), and a longer time to the first episode of VAT/VAP (9 versus 4.5 days, P =0.02).

Recently, there has been increased interest in the use of adjunctive aerosolized antibiotic therapy for VAT and VAP, administered by an improved nebulizer delivery system to increase weaning from the ventilator and shorten ICU stay [4],[9],[10]. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study is in progress to evaluate adjunctive aerosolized amikacin and fosfomycin therapy for the treatment of VAP due to Gram-negative bacilli and to decrease ventilator days and ICU stay [11].

Interestingly, different approaches exist for antibiotic treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI) due to cystitis or pyelonephritis versus respiratory tract infections due to VAT and VAP (Figure 1A). Patients with UTI presenting with fever, leukocytosis, dysuria, and a urine culture having at least 100,000 bacterial pathogens per milliliter due to cystitis or pyelonephritis are treated with antibiotics as a standard of care and infected urine can be removed by voiding or bladder catheter. By comparison, VAT and VAP are `descending’ infections in a mechanically ventilated, intubated patient requiring removal of infected secretions by intermittent suctioning (Figure 1B). Leakage of oropharyngeal secretions around the endotracheal tube (ETT) or embolization of bacterial biofilm from the inner surface of the ETT to lower tracheobronchial and alveoli after airway instrumentation have been implicated in the pathogenesis of VAT to VAP. Also, bacterial colonization in ventilator tubing condensate can be inadvertently washed into the lung, especially with supine positioning. Intubated patients have decreased bacterial clearance due to reduced cough, sedation, and the presence of the ETT, all of which may increase bacterial lung burden and challenge lung cellular and humoral defenses. These significant clinical differences in pathogenesis between lung and urinary tract infections, in our opinion, add support for the use of pre-emptive appropriate intravenous or aerosolized antibiotic treatment (or both) for VAT or VAP as a standard of care [1],[8],[9].
Figure 1

Pathogenesis and routine antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infections versus ventilator-associated pneumonia and tracheobronchitis. (A) The pathogenesis of `ascending’ urinary tract infection due to cystitis or pyelonephritis or both, which are currently treated with antibiotics as a `standard of care’. (B) The pathogenesis of `descending’, primarily `one-way’ respiratory tract infection manifests as ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis or pneumonia, for which we would recommend treatment with intravenous or aerosolized antibiotic therapy or both. Reprinted with permission from Lippincott Williams & Wilkins [12].

Ventilated ICU patients developing VAT or VAP or both are at increased risk for chronic co-morbidities that include debility, tracheostomy, acute and chronic lung damage, delirium, post-traumatic stress disorder, and short- or long-term cognitive impairment that increase the need for rehabilitation, chronic care, hospital readmission, and increased health-care costs [13],[14]. Unroe and colleagues [15] studied 99 ventilated patient survivors 1 year after hospital discharge and found increased need for chronic care, hospital readmission, multiple transitions of care, and increased health-care costs. At 1 year, only 9% of study patients were living independently, there were 150 hospital readmissions and numerous transitions to and from chronic care facilities, and health-care costs were estimated at $3.5 million per survivor.

In a recent survey of VAT involving medical staff in 288 ICUs in 16 different countries worldwide, 50.3% of respondents recommended antibiotic therapy for VAT, 93% thought VAT increased length of ICU stay, and 50% believed that VAT increased patient mortality [16]. Data from several randomized clinical trials and a meta-analysis support the use of pre-emptive appropriate antibiotic therapy for VAT to reduce progression to VAP, ventilator days, length of ICU stay, and associated health-care costs [3],[4],[6],[8]. Assessing serial semi-quantitative ETA or quantitative ETA cultures allows identification of likely bacterial pathogens and antibiotic sensitivity data needed to initiate appropriate `targeted’ intravenous or aerosolized antibiotic therapy (or both), especially for infections due to S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter species, or other multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens [17]. Considering the available data, we recommend that pre-emptive appropriate antibiotic therapy for VAT be considered a new standard of care.

Authors’ contributions

DEC initiated the discussion of the organization of the manuscript and drafted the first version. JH reviewed, commented on, and edited the manuscript with a focus on clinical points. YL reviewed, commented on, and edited the manuscript with a focus on the data presentation and citation of references. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abbreviations

ETA: 

Endotracheal aspirate

ETT: 

Endotracheal tube

UTI: 

Urinary tract infection

VAP: 

Ventilator-associated pneumonia

VAT: 

Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Infectious Diseases & Prevention, Lahey Medical Center & Hospital
(2)
Tufts University School of Medicine
(3)
Department of Surgical Critical Care, Lahey Medical Center & Hospital
(4)
Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Lahey Medical Center & Hospital

References

  1. Nseir S, Martin-Loeches I, Makris D, Jaillette E, Karvouniaris M, Valles J, Zakynthinos E, Artigas A: Impact of appropriate antimicrobial treatment on transition from ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis to ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care. 2014, 18: R129-10.1186/cc13940.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Nseir S, Di Pompeo C, Pronnier P, Beague S, Onimus T, Saulnier F, Grandbastien B, Mathieu D, Delvallez-Roussel M, Durocher A: Nosocomial tracheobronchitis in mechanically ventilated patients: incidence, aetiology and outcome. Eur Respir J. 2002, 20: 1483-1489. 10.1183/09031936.02.00012902.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Nseir S, Favory R, Jozefowicz E, Decamps F, Dewavrin F, Brunin G, Di Pompeo C, Mathieu D, Durocher A: Antimicrobial treatment for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Crit Care. 2008, 12: R62-10.1186/cc6890.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Palmer LB, Smaldone GC, Chen JJ, Baram D, Duan T, Monteforte M, Varela M, Tempone AK, O’Riordan T, Daroowalla F, Richman P: Aerosolized antibiotics and ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2008, 36: 2008-2013. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817c0f9e.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Craven DE, Lei Y, Ruthazer R, Sarwar A, Hudcova J: Incidence and outcomes of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and pneumonia. Am J Med. 2013, 126: 542-549. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.12.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Agrafiotis M, Siempos II, Falagas ME: Frequency, prevention, outcome and treatment of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Med. 2010, 104: 325-336. 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.09.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Dallas J, Skrupky L, Abebe N, Boyle WA, Kollef MH: Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis in a mixed surgical and medical ICU population. Chest. 2011, 139: 513-518. 10.1378/chest.10-1336.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouza E, Granda MJ, Hortal J, Barrio JM, Cercenado E, Muñoz P: Pre-emptive broad-spectrum treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia in high-risk patients. Intensive Care Med. 2013, 39: 1547-1555. 10.1007/s00134-013-2997-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kollef MH, Hamilton CW, Montgomery AB: Aerosolized antibiotics: do they add to the treatment of pneumonia?. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2013, 26: 538-544. 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Abu-Salah T, Dhand R: Inhaled antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and ventilator-associated pneumonia: an update. Adv Ther. 2011, 28: 728-747. 10.1007/s12325-011-0051-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Montgomery AB, Vallance S, Abuan T, Tservistas M, Davies A: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled dose-escalation phase 1 study of aerosolized amikacin and fosfomycin delivered via the PARI Investigational eFlow Inline Nebulizer System in mechanically ventilated patients. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2014, Epub ahead of print.,Google Scholar
  12. Craven DE, Hudcova J, Craven KA, Scopa C, Lei Y: Antibiotic treatment of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: to treat or not to treat? Curr Opin Crit Care 2014, Epub ahead of print.,Google Scholar
  13. Pandharipande PP, Girard TD, Jackson JC, Morandi A, Thompson JL, Pun BT, Brummel NE, Hughes CG, Vasilevskis EE, Shintani AK, Moons KG, Geevarghese SK, Canonico A, Hopkins RO, Bernard GR, Dittus RS, Ely EW: Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2013, 369: 1306-1316. 10.1056/NEJMoa1301372.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Herridge M, Cameron JI: Disability after critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2013, 369: 1367-1369. 10.1056/NEJMe1309482.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Unroe M, Kahn JM, Carson SS, Govert JA, Martinu T, Sathy SJ, Clay AS, Chia J, Gray A, Tulsky JA, Cox CE: One-year trajectories of care and resource utilization for recipients of prolonged mechanical ventilation: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2010, 153: 167-175. 10.7326/0003-4819-153-3-201008030-00007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Rodríguez A, Póvoa P, Nseir S, Salluh J, Curcio D, Martín-Loeches I: Incidence and diagnosis of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) in the intensive care unit: an international online survey. Crit Care. 2014, 18: R32-10.1186/cc13725.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Craven DE, Hjalmarson KI: Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and pneumonia: thinking outside the box. Clin Infect Dis. 2010, 51 (Suppl 1): S59-S66. 10.1086/653051.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Craven et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. The licensee has exclusive rights to distribute this article, in any medium, for 12 months following its publication. After this time, the article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement