Skip to main content

Erythropoietin and organ protection: lessons from negative clinical trials


Based on its pleiotropic effects, erythropoietin can decrease inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. Erythropoietin provides organ protection for the heart, brain, and kidney in diverse preclinical animal studies, especially models that include ischemia-reperfusion injury and/or inflammation. However, large clinical studies in coronary reperfusion, heart failure, stroke, acute kidney injury, and chronic renal disease have failed to demonstrate improved outcomes. A study in a previous issue of Critical Care examining the ability of erythropoietin to prevent or ameliorate acute kidney injury in patients undergoing complex valvular heart surgery is similarly negative. The failure of erythropoietin in clinical studies may be due to an inadequate dose, since the receptors responsible for organ protection may require higher concentrations than those responsible for erythropoiesis. However, as has occurred in studies in sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome, the negative studies probably reflect an inadequate understanding of the complexity of the underlying processes with multiple redundant and interacting pathways that may differ among the large number of different cell types involved. As tools to understand this complexity and integrate it on an organismal basis continue to evolve, we will develop the ability to use erythropoietin and related nonhematopoietic agents for organ protection.

In a previous issue of Critical Care, Kim and colleagues report a randomized double-blind study of the effects of erythropoietin on acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing complex valvular cardiac surgery [1]. AKI occurred in 34% of patients, but there were no differences between the two groups in the incidence or severity of AKI, increases in AKI biomarkers (cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) or increases in markers of inflammation (interleukin-6 and myeloperoxidase). Despite strong preclinical data and a previous small clinical trial, this was a negative study. An understanding of the rationale for using erythropoietin for organ protection and a review of negative clinical trials can help us understand the information necessary for future studies.

Erythropoietin was first identified as the major regulator of erythropoiesis. The molecule was isolated in 1977, and the gene was cloned in 1985. Recombinant human erythropoietin was approved in the United States in 1989 for treatment of anemia associated with chronic renal failure, and its use subsequently expanded to additional indications. Erythropoietin is a 30.4 kDa glycoprotein with 165 amino acids, and is a class I cytokine predominantly produced by peritubular interstitial fibroblasts in the renal cortex and outer medulla. The majority of physiological effects are due to binding to erythropoietin receptors that are found on multiple cell types, including renal tubular and collecting duct cells, neurons, astrocytes, microglia, cardiomyocytes, and vascular cells [2]. Following binding of erythropoietin, the erythropoietin receptor activates JAK2, a member of the Janus-type protein tyrosine kinase family, which then activates multiple signaling pathways including mitogen-activated protein kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, signal transducer and activator of transcription 5, and protein kinase B. Different signaling pathways may be activated in different cell types. Erythropoietin has pleiotropic cellular protective effects and can decrease inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis.

Erythropoietin has been studied for brain, heart, and kidney protection [2]. Erythropoietin improves survival in neurons during hypoxia in cell culture, animal studies demonstrate protection against ischemia, and initial clinical trials suggested protection in ischemic stroke, but larger trials did not confirm benefits and even suggested adverse outcomes [3]. For the heart, animal studies demonstrate protection after ischemia-reperfusion, and small clinical studies demonstrated benefit in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction. However, large clinical trials did not demonstrate benefits [4],[5]. Similarly, trials in patients with anemia and heart failure do not demonstrate improved outcomes and raise concerns about increased complications [6],[7]. Aggressive use of erythropoietin for treatment of anemia in patients with renal disease or malignancy has also failed to demonstrate benefits [8]-[10].

The story of erythropoietin use for renal protection has been similar. Animal data demonstrate protective effects, especially in the setting of ischemia-reperfusion injury [2]. However, clinical studies in renal transplantation and chronic kidney disease have been negative [11]. AKI occurs in response to renal ischemia and inflammation and increases morbidity, hospital length of stay, and short-term and long-term mortality. AKI occurs in approximately one-half of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic effects of erythropoietin suggest it may be effective in preventing or ameliorating AKI in this setting. In a pilot study by Oh and colleagues, erythropoietin decreased AKI and mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery [12]. However, in the study by Kim and colleagues and in another large cardiac surgery study [13], erythropoietin did not decrease the incidence of AKI, did not improve outcome, and did not decrease markers of inflammation. These negative data are consistent with the EARLYARF trial where erythropoietin did not prevent or ameliorate the course of AKI in ICU patients with elevated urinary biomarkers for renal injury [14].

Erythropoietin may have failed in clinical trials due to insufficient dose. Preclinical studies have frequently used doses in the range of 1,000 to 5,000 IU/kg, an order of magnitude higher than the dose of 300 IU/kg used in many clinical studies. Although this lower dose is adequate for erythropoiesis, the erythropoietin receptors responsible for organ protection are different. Higher doses of erythropoietin could be used but may have adverse effects such as thrombosis and hypertension. One future approach may be the use of nonhematopoietic derivatives such as carbamylated erythropoietin that produce cellular and organ protection in animal studies.

Although dose may be an issue, the multiple negative clinical studies suggest that our approach and understanding of renal, cardiac, and neurologic problems is too simplistic. There is a complex interplay between vascular abnormalities and inflammatory mediators, there are a myriad of different cell types involved, and, within each individual cell, there are complex interactions among multiple pathways that each have redundancy. In this setting (and similarly in sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome), the net impact of an intervention that itself has pleiotropic effects becomes unpredictable, resulting in negative clinical trials. For example, erythropoietin is considered to be anti-inflammatory but can worsen inflammation-induced injury in other studies [15],[16]. Effective use of erythropoietin for organ protection will require a better understanding of the relevant processes that occur at the cellular level [17] and the ability to phenotype individual patients for relevant factors that may affect outcome. With increased knowledge, erythropoietin may become an important weapon for preventing AKI, but it will not be a magic bullet.



Acute kidney injury


  1. Kim JH, Shim JK, Song JW, Song Y, Kim HB, Kwak YL: Effect of erythropoietin on the incidence of acute kidney injury following complex valvular heart surgery: a double blind, randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety. Crit Care. 2013, 17: R254-10.1186/cc13081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore EM, Bellomo R, Nichol AD: Erythropoietin as a novel brain and kidney protective agent. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011, 39: 356-372.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ehrenreich H, Weissenborn K, Prange H, Schneider D, Weimar C, Wartenberg K, Schellinger PD, Bohn M, Becker H, Wegrzyn M, Jähnig P, Herrmann M, Knauth M, Bähr M, Heide W, Wagner A, Schwab S, Reichmann H, Schwendemann G, Dengler R, Kastrup A, Bartels C: Recombinant human erythropoietin in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2009, 40: e647-e656. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.564872.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Najjar SS, Rao SV, Melloni C, Raman SV, Povsic TJ, Melton L, Barsness GW, Prather K, Heitner JF, Kilaru R, Gruberg L, Hasselblad V, Greenbaum AB, Patel M, Kim RJ, Talan M, Ferrucci L, Longo DL, Lakatta EG, Harrington RA: Intravenous erythropoietin in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: REVEAL: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011, 305: 1863-1872. 10.1001/jama.2011.592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Prunier F, Bière L, Gilard M, Boschat J, Mouquet F, Bauchart JJ, Charbonnier B, Genée O, Guérin P, Warin-Fresse K, Durand E, Lafont A, Christiaens L, Abi-Khalil W, Delépine S, Benard T, Furber A: Single high-dose erythropoietin administration immediately after reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the erythropoietin in myocardial infarction trial. Am Heart J. 2012, 163: 200-207. 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.11.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Swedberg K, Young JB, Anand IS, Cheng S, Desai AS, Diaz R, Maggioni AP, McMurray JJ, O'Connor C, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD, Sun Y, Tendera M, van Veldhuisen DJ: Treatment of anemia with darbepoetin alfa in systolic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2013, 368: 1210-1219. 10.1056/NEJMoa1214865.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghali JK, Anand IS, Abraham WT, Fonarow GC, Greenberg B, Krum H, Massie BM, Wasserman SM, Trotman ML, Sun Y, Knusel B, Armstrong P: Randomized double-blind trial of darbepoetin alfa in patients with symptomatic heart failure and anemia. Circulation. 2008, 117: 526-535. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.698514.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh AK, Szczech L, Tang KL, Barnhart H, Sapp S, Wolfson M, Reddan D: Correction of anemia with epoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2006, 355: 2085-2098. 10.1056/NEJMoa065485.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Drüeke TB, Locatelli F, Clyne N, Eckardt KU, Macdougall IC, Tsakiris D, Burger HU, Scherhag A: Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia. N Engl J Med. 2006, 355: 2071-2084. 10.1056/NEJMoa062276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tonia T, Mettler A, Robert N, Schwarzer G, Seidenfeld J, Weingart O, Hyde C, Engert A, Bohlius J: Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012, 12:

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sureshkumar KK, Hussain SM, Ko TY, Thai NL, Marcus RJ: Effect of high-dose erythropoietin on graft function after kidney transplantation: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012, 7: 1498-1506. 10.2215/CJN.01360212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oh SW, Chin HJ, Chae DW, Na KY: Erythropoietin improves long-term outcomes in patients with acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Korean Med Sci. 2012, 27: 506-511. 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.5.506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. de Seigneux S, Ponte B, Weiss L, Pugin J, Romand JA, Martin PY, Saudan P: Epoetin administrated after cardiac surgery: effects on renal function and inflammation in a randomized controlled study. BMC Nephrol. 2012, 13: 132-10.1186/1471-2369-13-132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Endre ZH, Walker RJ, Pickering JW, Shaw GM, Frampton CM, Henderson SJ, Hutchison R, Mehrtens JE, Robinson JM, Schollum JB, Westhuyzen J, Celi LA, McGinley RJ, Campbell IJ, George PM: Early intervention with erythropoietin does not affect the outcome of acute kidney injury (the EARLYARF trial). Kidney Int. 2010, 77: 1020-1030. 10.1038/ki.2010.25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu WT, Hu TM, Lin NT, Subeq YM, Lee RP, Hsu BG: Low-dose erythropoietin aggravates endotoxin-induced organ damage in conscious rats. Cytokine. 2010, 49: 155-162. 10.1016/j.cyto.2009.11.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sølling C, Christensen AT, Nygaard U, Krag S, Frøkiaer J, Wogensen L, Krog J, Tønnesen EK: Erythropoietin does not attenuate renal dysfunction or inflammation in a porcine model of endotoxemia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011, 55: 411-421. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02396.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Freddolino PL, Tavazoie S: The dawn of virtual cell biology. Cell. 2012, 150: 248-250. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald G Pearl.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pearl, R.G. Erythropoietin and organ protection: lessons from negative clinical trials. Crit Care 18, 526 (2014).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: