Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

Sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia

Critical Care201418:503

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0503-3

©  Garcia-Alvarez et al. licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

  • Published:

Abstract

There is overwhelming evidence that sepsis and septic shock are associated with hyperlactatemia (sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia (SAHL)). SAHL is a strong independent predictor of mortality and its presence and progression are widely appreciated by clinicians to define a very high-risk population. Until recently, the dominant paradigm has been that SAHL is a marker of tissue hypoxia. Accordingly, SAHL has been interpreted to indicate the presence of an `oxygen debt’ or `hypoperfusion’, which leads to increased lactate generation via anaerobic glycolysis. In light of such interpretation of the meaning of SAHL, maneuvers to increase oxygen delivery have been proposed as its treatment. Moreover, lactate levels have been proposed as a method to evaluate the adequacy of resuscitation and the nature of the response to the initial treatment for sepsis. However, a large body of evidence has accumulated that strongly challenges such notions. Much evidence now supports the view that SAHL is not due only to tissue hypoxia or anaerobic glycolysis. Experimental and human studies all consistently support the view that SAHL is more logically explained by increased aerobic glycolysis secondary to activation of the stress response (adrenergic stimulation). More importantly, new evidence suggests that SAHL may actually serve to facilitate bioenergetic efficiency through an increase in lactate oxidation. In this sense, the characteristics of lactate production best fit the notion of an adaptive survival response that grows in intensity as disease severity increases. Clinicians need to be aware of these developments in our understanding of SAHL in order to approach patient management according to biological principles and to interpret lactate concentrations during sepsis resuscitation according to current best knowledge.

Keywords

  • Lactate
  • Septic Patient
  • Lactate Concentration
  • Oxygen Delivery
  • Tissue Hypoxia

Introduction

Severe sepsis and septic shock are a major health problem worldwide and among critically ill patients in particular [1],[2]. Beyond the identification of the likely focus of infection and of the organisms responsible, treatment with appropriate antibiotics, and drainage of the focus itself when possible, early and aggressive hemodynamic resuscitation is recommended for the treatment of septic patients [3]. The identification of severe sepsis is based on clinical signs but also on laboratory findings. Among these, sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia (SAHL) has been recently promoted as a way of identifying patients with `cryptic’ shock who require focused, early goal-directed therapy [4].

In fact, SAHL is a common finding, reaching levels as high as 15.0 mmol/L in some patients [5]. Plasma lactate levels and their trend over time are reliable markers of illness severity and mortality [6],[7], being recently included in a multibiomarker-based outcome risk model for adult patients with septic shock [8]. Even relative hyperlactatemia (blood lactate concentrations >0.75 mmol/L) is independently associated with increased hospital mortality [9],[10].

Raised blood lactate concentrations in the setting of sepsis are frequently viewed as evidence of tissue hypoxia and/or oxygen debt secondary to hypoperfusion [11],[12]. According to such paradigms, SAHL is due to anaerobic glycolysis induced by tissue hypoxia. Such tissue hypoxia in widely believed to be a major cause of organ failure and mortality. Moreover, changes in lactate concentration over time during intervention (for example, incorrectly labeled lactate `clearance’) have been proposed as end points in sepsis resuscitation, as means of determining the adequacy of oxygen delivery, and as indicators of resolution of global tissue hypoxia.

Despite such strongly and widely held views, the source, biochemistry, removal and metabolic functions of lactate in sepsis remain unclear. It is also uncertain whether SAHL represents a maladaptive or protective response. The sheer complexity of lactate, a ubiquitously produced and utilized metabolite that, like glucose, is central to almost every energy-related pathway in humans, is one of the main reasons for the lack of a clear understanding of its pathophysiology and clinical meaning.

In this clinical review, we examine key aspects of SAHL and explain why it cannot be used exclusively as a reliable marker of tissue hypoxia, oxygen debt or anaerobic glycolysis. Instead, we provide evidence that lactate is an important aerobically produced intermediate metabolite that is most likely released as a consequence of increased or accelerated aerobic glycolysis and the stress response. Lactate in sepsis may at times be related to tissue dysoxia but, perhaps just as frequently or even simultaneously, it may be unrelated to oxygen debt and unlikely to respond to iatrogenic increases in calculated systemic oxygen delivery. Instead, lactate may well represent an important energy source and may be helpful for survival in sepsis.

Normal lactate metabolism

Production

Using carbon isotopes, daily lactate production in resting humans has been estimated at approximately 20 mmol/kg/day (range of 0.9 to 1.0 mmol/kg/hour) [13]. Lactate can be released into the blood stream by many different cells [14], but the exact lactate balance (production minus utilization) at rest for each organ or tissue is unknown. Lactate clearance has been estimated at an extraordinary value of 800 to 1,800 ml/minute by studying the disposal of infused sodium L-lactate [15]. This implies that all of the blood can be cleared of lactate every 3 to 4 minutes and that, at a concentration of 1 to 2 mmol/L, 60 to 120 mmol of lactate are removed every hour.

Lactate is formed from pyruvate in the cytosol as part of glycolysis. Its concentration is in equilibrium with pyruvate as maintained by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), an enzyme that favors lactate production and normally maintains a constant lactate to pyruvate ratio of approximately 10:1. Logically, therefore, any condition that increases pyruvate generation will increase lactate generation. Importantly, lactate generation from pyruvate releases NAD+, a major acceptor of electrons during glycolysis, thus potentially facilitating glycolytic energy generation. Without an efficient mechanism in the cytosol to recycle NAD+ from NADH, glycolysis cannot happen.

Removal

Lactate can be metabolized by the liver and the kidney either by direct oxidation or as a source of glucose.

Gluconeogenesis

Its production by muscle or other tissues and its transformation into glucose by liver and kidney are known as the Cori cycle (gluconeogenesis) [16]. Lactate is quantitatively the most important gluconeogenic precursor in humans and thus a key source of glucose [17]. Hepatocytes are the major site of oxidative lactate uptake but the kidneys account for approximately 30% of lactate metabolism. Transformation of lactate into glucose by the kidneys is responsible for 50% of overall lactate conversion to glucose [18].

Oxidation

Lactate is not only transformed into glucose via the Cori cycle, it is also removed by oxidation (via pyruvate and the citric acid cycle) [19]. Approximately half of available lactate is disposed of via oxidation at rest, and 75 to 80% during exercise [20]. This observation suggests that lactate is a bioenergetic fuel during stress and can serve to both spare blood glucose utilization and deliver additional glucose [19]. This oxidation pathway has been carefully assessed in exercising human skeletal muscle where isotope studies confirm simultaneous lactate uptake and release by muscle [21],[22]. Hyperlactatemia can cause muscle to switch from release to uptake via oxidation [23]. Myocyte compartmentalization (into a glycolytic and an oxidative compartment) has been proposed as the most logical explanation for such simultaneous lactate production and utilization in muscle [22]. The glycolytic compartment (likely close to the myofibrils and their glycogen stores) is considered associated with glycogenolysis/glycolysis and lactate release. The oxidative compartment (likely close to the mitochondria) is considered responsible for lactate uptake/oxidation. This 'intracellular lactate shuttle' hypothesis implies that lactate production via glycolysis in the cytosol is balanced by oxidation in the mitochondria of the same cell [24].

Contrary to past beliefs that lactate is confined to the cytosol, recent evidence has also clearly demonstrated that lactate produced in the cytosol can be transported across mitochondria by monocarboxylate transport proteins (MCTs) and oxidized to pyruvate by a mitochondrial lactate oxidation complex (mLOC). This mLOC is composed of a mitochondrial LDH, a transmembrane glycoptrotein called CD147, acting as the chaperone protein for MCT type 1, and also a cytochrome oxidase. This complex is localized at the level of the mitochondrial inner membrane, as demonstrated by confocal laser scanning microscopy, western blotting of cell subfractions, and immunoprecipitation techniques [24]. Low concentrations of lactate in the mitochondrial matrix facilitate lactate mitochondrial influx and oxidation to pyruvate. Pyruvate is then transported from the intermembrane space where mLOC resides, into the mitochondrial matrix and oxidized via the tricarboxylic acid cycle [25],[26]. Importantly, MCT1 and mLOC-related genes are differentially upregulated by lactate through a positive feedback loop [27]. Increasing expression of lactate transporters on mitochondrial membranes allows a more effective 'intracellular lactate shuttle'. Some lactate can also be exported to adjacent cells, tissues and organs to serve as oxidative or gluconeogenic substrates as part of an adjacent `cell-to-cell lactate shuttle’ [26] (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Schematic view of the intracellular lactate shuttle with the mitochondrial lactate oxidation complex and the cell-to-cell lactate shuttle (CCLS). Myocytes have a glycolytic and an oxidative compartment. The glycolytic compartment in the cytosol is close to the myofibrils and their glycogen stores. It is associated with glycogenolysis/glycolysis and lactate release into the circulation. The oxidative compartment in close proximity to the mitochondria is considered responsible for lactate oxidation. Lactate produced in the cytosol is oxidized to pyruvate via the lactate oxidation complex in the mitochondria of the same cell. Pyruvate is then transported across the inner mitochondrial membrane via a monocarboxylate transport protein (MCT1). MCT1 is found in the mitochondrial inner membrane as part of the lactate oxidation complex together with its chaperone protein CD147, cytochrome oxidase (COX) and mitochondrial lactate dehydrogenase (mLDH). mLDH is found in the outer side of the inner membrane. Once pyruvate enters the mitochondrial matrix, it is metabolized by the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA). The CCLS hypothesis supports the idea that lactate produced in muscle can also serve as a substrate in highly oxidative cells (heart, brain) or contribute to gluconeogenesis (liver, kidney). cLDH, cytosolic lactate dehydrogenase.

Lactate use during stress

The heart takes up and oxidizes lactate at rest [28]. Myocardial lactate uptake increases during exercise, β-adrenergic stimulation, elevated afterload, fast pacing and during shock [29]-[31]. During hyperlactatemia, lactate can account for up to 60% of cardiac oxidative substrate and exceed glucose as a source of pyruvate [30]. During shock, the heart oxidizes lactate for the majority of its energy needs [29]. Lactate infusion increases cardiac output in anesthetized pigs and cardiac performance in patients with acute heart failure [32] and both cardiogenic and septic shock [33]. Indeed systemic lactate deprivation is associated with cardiovascular collapse and early death of the animals [33],[34].

The human brain changes to a lactate consumer during increased metabolic demand [35]. Lactate accounts for about 7% of cerebral energy requirement under basal conditions and up to 25% during exercise [14]. Blood lactate is oxidized by neurons in the conscious healthy human brain or converted to glycogen in astrocytes. The contribution of lactate as a brain energy source increases during hyperlactatemia [35],[36]. Lactate is used as a primary energy source during experimental insulin-induced hypoglycemia and is readily oxidized by the brain in an activity-dependent manner [37]. Collective evidence from brain-functional imaging literature supports the existence of an `astrocyte-neuronal lactate shuttle’ where lactate derived from astrocyte glycolysis is transported to adjacent neurons, converted to pyruvate and oxidized via the tricarboxylic acid cycle [38].

Why has the tissue hypoxia paradigm emerged and dominated until now?

The clinical syndrome of lactic acidosis was popularized by Huckabee and Weil over five decades ago [39],[40]. These authors proposed that elevated blood lactate levels during experimental and clinical shock states served as a measure of the degree of oxygen deficit and the severity of injury. It became widely believed that, in critically ill patients, when oxygen delivery failed to meet oxygen demand an oxygen debt with global tissue hypoxia and lactic acidosis would ensue [12],[41],[42]. Furthermore, classic teaching describes type A lactic acidosis, which occurs due to inadequate oxygen delivery with the presence of anaerobic glycolysis, and type B lactic acidosis, which occurs in the absence of anaerobic glycolysis and is secondary to altered clearance, malignancy, or drugs [42]. It is widely assumed that type A lactic acidosis is the cause of an elevated lactate concentration in the critically ill patient with an overt or occult hemodynamic disturbance [12],[41],[42]. An increased blood lactate concentration is therefore regarded as evidence of anaerobic metabolism and tissue hypoxia. It follows from this reasoning that patients with an elevated blood lactate level should be treated by increasing oxygen delivery.

Source of lactate in sepsis

The physiologic source of lactate generation during sepsis is currently a matter of debate and research. Recent data suggest that other potential non-hypoxic causes could contribute to SAHL.

Human studies have often failed to show a relationship between hyperlactatemia and any indicators of tissue hypoxia or other indices of impaired cellular oxygenation (oxygen delivery/oxygen extraction; Table 1).
Table 1

Lack of evidence for the 'traditional' mechanisms explaining sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia

Tissue hypoxia

  

Boekstegers et al.[43]

Muscle PO2 in septic patients

No evidence of muscle hypoxia

Sair et al.[44]

Levy et al.[45]

VanderMeer et al.[46]

Intestinal and bladder mucosal PO2 in septic animals

No evidence of mucosal hypoxia

Rosser et al.[47]

Hotchkiss and Karl [48]

Cellular oxygenation by using hypoxic marker ([18?F] fluoromisonidazole) in septic animals

No cellular hypoxia in muscle, heart, lung and brain

Regueira et al.[49]

Measurements of HIF-1? in septic patients/animals

No relation between HIF-1? and lactate levels

Textoris et al.[50]

Opdam and Bellomo [51]

Lactate production by the lung in septic shock patients

Substantial lactate release by the lung

Mitochondrial dysfunction

  

Hotchkiss and Karl [48]

Measurements of ATP and PCr in muscle samples of septic animals/patients

No decrease in any of the indicators of mitochondrial function

Alamdari et al.[53]

Brealey et al.[54]

Pyruvate dehydrogenase

  

Alamdari et al.[53]

Mitochondrial PDH activity in septic animals/patients

No association between PDH deficit/dysfunction and lactate increase

Jahoor et al.[55]

Stacpoole et al.[56]

Dichloroacetate lowers lactate levels by stimulating the PDH complex

DO2 – VO2 mismatch

  

Ronco et al.[57],[58]

Critical DO2 in septic patients as they approached death

No association between hyperlactatemia and decreased DO2 or impaired O2ER

Mira et al.[59]

Relationship between DO2/SvO2 and SAHL

No relationship between DO2/SvO2 was found

Astiz et al.[60]

Marik and Sibbald [65]

Increases in DO2 did not decrease lactate concentration in SAHL

DO2, oxygen delivery; HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor; O2ER, oxygen extraction ratio; PCr, phosphocreatine; PDH, pyruvate dehydrogenase; PO2, partial pressure of oxygen; SAHL, sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia; SvO2, mixed venous oxygen saturation.

Tissue hypoxia

Boekstegers and colleagues [43] measured bicep muscle partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) by intermittent and continuous methods in 70 patients distributed in three different groups (sepsis, limited infection and cardiogenic shock). These investigators found normal tissue PO2 values in all groups and elevated values in the septic group (reaching levels as high as 50 mmHg in the severe septic state). No correlation between serum lactate levels and muscle PO2 was found. Even in patients in the final state of hypodynamic septic shock leading to death, mean muscle PO2 did not decrease to <30 mmHg. Considering that normal muscle PO2 values vary from 15 to 30 mmHg, it is difficult to imagine that muscle hypoxia could explain SAHL in these patients.

Sair and colleagues [44] compared the values of forearm muscle PO2 and subcutaneous PO2 between severe septic patients and healthy volunteers. They found increased muscle oxygenation in the septic group despite a mean plasma lactate concentration of 2.8 + 0.4 mmol/L in the septic group. These investigators also measured forearm blood flow by plethysmography. No statistical differences were found between both groups. More recently, Levy and colleagues [45] used a microdialysis technique to measure tissue PO2 in the quadriceps femoris muscle in patients with septic shock. They found values >36 mmHg in all patients despite raised blood lactate concentrations (4.0 ± 2.1 mmol/L) at the time of the study.

Lack of tissue hypoxia during SAHL was demonstrated in other tissues apart from the muscle. Intestinal and bladder mucosal PO2 values have been also reported to actually increase during sepsis in animal experiments [46],[47]. Hotchkiss and Karl [48] assessed the adequacy of cellular oxygenation in sepsis by using [18?F] fluoromisonidazole (an hypoxic marker). These investigators found no evidence of cellular hypoxia in muscle (gastrocnemius and diaphragm), heart, lung and brain despite an increase in lactate concentration in septic animal models compared with non-septic controls. Regueira and colleagues [49] showed in septic animals that hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1? was not expressed in the skeletal and cardiac muscle, pancreas, lung, or kidney despite a doubling in lactate levels. They also found that the respiration of skeletal muscle and liver-isolated mitochondria was normal.

In humans, the HIF-1? mRNA concentration was measured in patients with shock (septic, hemorrhagic or cardiogenic) and compared with that of a normal group. An increased expression was found in patients with shock compared to controls. However, investigators did not find any relationship between HIF-1? expression and lactate levels, outcomes or tissue oxygenation [50].

Opdam and Bellomo [51] found substantial lactate release from the lungs of patients with septic shock. It is biologically implausible that the lungs, bathed in oxygen and receiving the full cardiac output, would experience hypoperfusion, tissue hypoxia or anaerobic metabolism.

Mitochondrial dysfunction

A mitochondrial defect in oxygen utilization has been suggested as an explanation for SAHL in the presence of high tissue PO2. The concentrations of high-energy phosphates such as ATP or phosphocreatine (PCr) and the intracellular cytosolic pH are sensitive indicators of mitochondrial function and can be used to test for such postulated bioenergetic failure. Different animal studies assessed muscle metabolism in sepsis by using phosphorus 31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. These studies showed no evidence of alterations in high-energy phosphate metabolism (normal values of ATP were found with reduced values of PCr, which acts as a reservoir for ATP). No decrease in intracellular cytosolic pH was found in any of the studies [48],[52].

Alamdari and colleagues [53] found no change in ATP and PCr concentrations in animal muscle samples once sepsis was induced compared with a control group. Muscle lactate concentration was greater in the septic group compared with controls. Brealey and colleagues [54] analyzed ATP concentrations in skeletal muscle biopsies of patients with sepsis to compare these with a control group. Although lower ATP concentrations were found in non-surviving versus surviving septic patients, values remained higher in surviving septic patients compared with the control group.

Pyruvate dehydrogenase

Mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) is an enzyme complex that regulates the conversion of pyruvate into acetyl-coenzyme A (CoA) in the mitochondria. PDH function has been reported to be impaired in sepsis and as another possible explanation for SAHL (sepsis-induced PDH dysfunction). However, investigators using tracer techniques in patients with sepsis have not found a deficit but rather an increase in PDH activity and increased glycolytic flux to oxidation [55]. In animals there was no reduction of muscle PDH activity in the early phase of muscle lactate increases during sepsis. However, after 24 hours, inhibition of the PDH complex exists possibly due to an inflammatory up-regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (enzyme part of the PDH complex that decreases pyruvate flux through the PDH complex), thus limiting the conversion of pyruvate into acetyl-CoA [53]. If these changes apply to humans and PDH function is decreased in sepsis, then pyruvate will accumulate. This, in turn, will increase lactate production, without any need to invoke tissue hypoxia.

In addition, dichloroacetate (DCA), a drug that stimulates PDH complex activity, lowers lactate levels in septic patients and increases the rate of pyruvate oxidation and yet has no effect on tissue PO2. Numerous animal models and human studies have shown that DCA decreases intracellular lactate concentrations and has a dose-dependent hypolactatemic effect in septic states [56]. As DCA has no effect on tissue oxygenation, such observations challenge the hypoxia paradigm of SAHL.

DO2-VO2 mismatch

A mismatch between tissue-level oxygen delivery (DO2) and oxygen consumption (VO2) has been proposed as an explanation for SAHL. Thus, indicators of tissue perfusion/oxygenation (cardiac index, DO2, VO2, oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER), central/mixed venous oxygen saturation (cSvO2/SvO2)) have been assessed in relation to lactate blood levels.

Ronco and colleagues [57] tried to identify the critical DO2 in ICU patients (including septic patients) as they approached death. A raised arterial lactate concentration was not associated with decreased DO2 or impaired tissue O2ER. In fact, baseline DO2 in these patients was about three times the critical DO2 in the presence of a lactate concentration of 4.2 ± 3.2 mmol/L. There was also no difference in critical DO2 between patients who had normal or increased arterial lactate values. In a further study, these investigators found that, in septic patients, there was no clinical difference in the relationship between DO2 and VO2 (measured by expired gas analysis) between patients who had normal or increased plasma lactate concentrations [58]. Mira and colleagues [59] confirmed these findings in patients with severe sepsis and SAHL.

Astiz and colleagues [60] were also unable to identify a critical DO2 or SvO2 associated with increased lactate concentrations in septic patients (mean value of 5.3 ± 0.5 mmol/L), even after a separate analysis of those patients who ultimately died. Increases in arterial lactate concentrations were present over a wide range of DO2 and SvO2 values (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Relationship between arterial blood lactate levels and oxygen delivery (DO 2 )/mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO 2 ) . No critical values of DO2 or SvO2 were seen to be associated with hyperlactatemia in septic patients (mean values of lactate 5.3 mmol/L). Increases in arterial lactate concentrations were present over a wide range of DO2 and SvO2 values.

The premise of increasing oxygen delivery in patients with sepsis is based on the assumption that sepsis is a hypermetabolic condition with patients having an imbalance between oxygen supply and demand as indicated by an increased lactate concentration [12],[41],[42]. In patients with sepsis, however, oxygen consumption and energy expenditure are broadly comparable to those of normal people, with energy expenditure actually decreasing with increasing sepsis severity [61]-[63]. Therefore, there is no requirement that oxygen delivery increase with sepsis. Increasing oxygen delivery in patients without an oxygen debt will not increase oxygen consumption and is likely to be harmful. Hayes and colleagues [64] performed a randomized controlled trial in which patients were randomized to `supranormal oxygen delivery’ or standard therapy. Despite a significant increase in oxygen delivery in the supranormal group, oxygen consumption remained unchanged while the mortality was significantly higher than in the control group. Similarly, Marik and Sibbald [65] demonstrated that blood transfusion in patients with SAHL did not increase measured oxygen consumption or result in a decrease in lactate concentration.

Finally, and more strikingly, a recent randomized clinical trial studied the hemodynamic effect of esmolol infusion in patients with septic shock. Esmolol induced a significant decrease in SAHL (P?=?0.006) compared with placebo, even though it simultaneously reduced oxygen delivery (P?<?0.001) [66]. If inadequate perfusion/oxygenation was the cause of hyperlactatemia, maneuvers to increase systemic or regional oxygen transport to supranormal values should correct hyperlactatemia; in this study the opposite was true. In addition, no studies have ever demonstrated such an effect. Finally, if, as appears obvious from the above observations, SAHL is not a consequence of lack of oxygen, another explanation needs to be considered.

Alternative explanations for sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia

Adrenergic-driven aerobic glycolysis

Accelerated aerobic glycolysis induced by sepsis-associated inflammation has been proposed as a more likely explanation for SAHL. In other words, SAHL represents a change in metabolic state, not a response to cell oxygenation issues. This theory holds that an altered metabolic state occurs when the rate of carbohydrate metabolism exceeds the oxidative capacity of the mitochondria. Pyruvate is produced by an increased utilization of glucose. Pyruvate is thus produced faster than it can be transformed into acetyl CoA by PDH. This increases cellular pyruvate concentration, which in turn increases lactate production by a mass effect. This theory is simple and logical. However, it is important to assess what observations support it.

First, preliminary data obtained from whole blood mRNA analysis in septic patients suggest significantly increased gene expression of enzymes and membrane transporters associated with glycolytic and lactate metabolism, namely glucose transporter (GLUT-1), hexokinase-3, pyruvate kinase (PKM-2), subunit A of LDH and MCT4 (unpublished data).

Second, isotope dilution methods show that, in severe sepsis, the turnover of both glucose and lactate is increased. Insulin resistance as seen in sepsis also favors glycolysis and glucose-lactate cycling. Crucially, in severe sepsis, hyperlactatemia appears related to increased production whereas lactate removal is similar to that of healthy subjects as shown by Revelly and colleagues [33], who studied lactate kinetics in patients with severe sepsis.

Pyruvate concentration is also increased by increased protein catabolism (sepsis-induced muscle proteolysis) as shown by an increase in the mRNA of proteolytic genes in skeletal muscle. This causes a release of amino acids like alanine, which is subsequently transformed into pyruvate by alanine aminotransferase and thereafter into lactate [67].

Endogenous/exogenous catecholamines are highly correlated with hyperlactatemia in sepsis. Through ?2-receptor stimulation they increase the activity of the Na+/K+-ATPase pump [68]. Human and animal studies have demonstrated that epinephrine increases lactate formation by an increase in the Na+/K+-ATPase activity [45],[69]. Levy and colleagues [70] confirmed this using a selective ?2-blockade and muscle microdialysis in a model of endotoxic shock. If beta-adrenergic activity is responsible to a clinically relevant degree for SAHL then, logically, in humans as in animal models one might expect that beta-blockade would simultaneously decrease oxygen delivery and yet also decrease lactate concentrations. No good quality human data are available to confirm or refute this implication of the metabolic theory of SAHL in humans [66].

There are also logical biochemical explanations as to how adrenergic stimulation might increase lactate in sepsis. Epinephrine increases cyclic AMP, thereby inducing stimulation of glycogenolysis and glycolysis with concomitant production of ATP and activation of the Na+/K+-ATPase pump. This activation consumes ATP, leading to the generation of ADP. ADP, via phosphofructokinase stimulation, reactivates glycolysis and hence generates more pyruvate and, consequently, more lactate (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Epinephrine-increased glycogenolysis and glycolysis is coupled to a Na + /K + -ATPase pump. Epinephrine increases cyclic AMP (cAMP) production, inducing stimulation of glycogenolysis/glycolysis and activation of the Na+/K+-ATPase pump. This activation consumes ATP, leading to the generation of ADP. ADP reactivates glycolysis and hence generates more pyruvate and, consequently, more lactate. TCA, tricarboxylic acid cycle.

Moreover, the role of Na+/K+-ATPase pump stimulation was further confirmed by Levy and colleagues [45] when muscle lactate production was totally inhibited by ouabain. Of clinical importance, in patients with shock, the ability to increase glycolysis and lactate production upon epinephrine stimulation is associated with better prognosis [71], suggesting that this is an adaptive response.

Where does lactate come from in sepsis?

Only limited information exists about the source of lactate in sepsis. This is because obtaining such information would require the invasive cannulation of major veins (renal, hepatic, portal, femoral, jugular, pulmonary) in order to measure lactate fluxes across vital organs and determine whether a particular organ adds or removes lactate during sepsis.

Investigators, however, using experimental models found the lung to be the major source of lactate [72]. Indeed, the lung changed from uptake to lactate production after induction of endotoxemia. Muscle and liver lactate fluxes were neutral and lactate uptake occurred in the gut and kidneys before and after endotoxemia. These investigators also reported that lactate is taken up by both gut and kidney during sepsis to a degree that is closely correlated with organ VO2, a finding consistent with the metabolic theory of lactate as an obligatory additional oxidation substrate during stress.

More directly relevant, in patients with septic shock, the lungs are a major source of lactate in a manner similar to animal models with an estimated total lactate release rate of 55.4 mmol/hour (interquartile range 24.3 to 217.6) [51]. Using continuous infusion of isotopic lactate and pyruvate, one can determine that the lungs simultaneously extract and release lactate, and that epinephrine stimulates lung conversion of pyruvate to lactate and lactate release into the systemic circulation [73].

Levy and colleagues [45] found that lactate and pyruvate concentrations measured by microdialysis are higher in muscle than in arteries (muscles are 40% of total cell mass) during septic shock. Muscles could, therefore, also have an important role in lactate production.

De Backer and colleagues [74] demonstrated that the splanchnic region is an uncommon source of net lactate generation in septic patients, even when arterial lactate concentrations are very high. Indeed, in sepsis, the splanchnic area consumes lactate rather than producing it.

In general, although not specifically studied in sepsis, the brain seems to be a major consumer rather than a lactate producer. As shown in critically ill patients before and after liver transplantation with or without hyperlactatemia, there is a net lactate uptake by the brain [75]. During sepsis the heart changes its metabolic substrate. It shifts from using free fatty acids to increased lactate utilization. Thus, the heart removes lactate.

If the splanchnic bed consumes lactate, if muscle is not hypoxic, if brain and heart consume lactate during stress, if the kidney uses lactate for the Cori cycle and if lung releases lactate during sepsis, it is difficult to conceive of any organ that is both hypoxic, underperfused, and in a state of anaerobic glycolysis responsible for lactate release.

Labeled exogenous lactate studies in septic patients show that oxidation by cells is the major fate (50 to 60%) of infused lactate. This further supports the notion that hyperlactatemia represents an adaptive protective mechanism by favoring lactate oxidation as an energy source. The amount of lactate not oxidized or converted into plasma glucose, however, remains substantial (approximately 30%) and becomes a substrate for glycogen synthesis by the liver and the kidney. Thus, under stress, lactate acts as an alternative fuel to glucose and a source of glucose itself.

The concept of lactate clearance

In 2004 Nguyen and colleagues reported that 'lactate clearance', defined as the percentage decrease in lactate from emergency department presentation to 6 hours later, was an independent predictor of mortality [41]. They concluded that 'lactate clearance in the early hospital course may indicate a resolution of global tissue hypoxia and that this is associated with decreased mortality rates.' This study popularized the concept of 'lactate clearance'.

Jones and colleagues [76] extended the concept of targeting resuscitation in sepsis to achieve a lactate `clearance’ of at least 10% as a marker of restoration of oxygen delivery to the tissues with resuscitation treatment. However, as mentioned above, we lack evidence to justify any assumption that this fall is due to a correction of an oxygen debt. The most recent Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommend 'targeting resuscitation to normalize lactate in patients with elevated lactate levels as a marker of tissue hypoperfusion' (grade 2C) [12].

In this sense, the concept of 'lactate clearance' is misleading and should not be logically used in patients with sepsis as either the final decision point in the resuscitation strategy to determine adequacy of oxygen delivery or a target for interventions (additional management to normalize lactate clearance). Further, the term `clearance’ in relation to lactate is scientifically and pharmacokinetically incorrect. Clearance represents the removal of a substance from a unit of volume over a unit of time, typically expressed in milliliters per minute. Logically, it is impossible to know if the rate and/or amount of decline in SAHL is due to increased removal, decreased production, dilution because of fluid administration during resuscitation or all the above in variable combinations. Moreover, increased lactate production can remain concealed by increased utilization in septic patients, suggesting that a normal blood level of lactate does not prove that its metabolism is normal [33].

The argument in favor of tissue hypoxia as the cause of sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia

In this review, we have made a strong case in favor of the `adrenergic/metabolic/energy optimization’ theory of SAHL and have provided a critique of the `dysoxia/tissue hypoxia/tissue hypoperfusion/anaerobic glycolysis’ theory of SAHL. We have taken this approach because we felt that, for historical reasons, the traditional view was dominant and required challenge, if only to trigger further research and reflection. However, much evidence also supports the view that tissue hypoxia may indeed occur in many patients with sepsis and be a major trigger for SAHL. First, there are many experimental and human studies linking measures of oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption to hyperlactatemia [77]-[80]. Such studies make a strong circumstantial case for lactate as a marker of dysoxia. Second, studies measuring the lactate/pyruvate ratio in sepsis have shown this to be increased [80]-[82]. Such an increased ratio provides additional evidence that tissue hypoxia may exist and may be relatively frequent in the setting of SAHL. Third, more recent work has highlighted the importance of the microcirculation in sepsis [83],[84]. Such studies show profound derangements of the microcirculation in sepsis with areas of no flow or slow flow or overly fast flow [84],[85]. Such abnormalities of micro-regional flow can easily and logically be seen as likely to impair oxygen delivery at a cellular level. Indeed, oxygen desaturation at a venular level is seen under these circumstances [84]. Thus, the tissue hypoxia theory presents a strong case, similar in strength to the metabolic theory presented above.

Conclusion

Hyperlactatemia is common in patients with sepsis, a marker of illness severity and a strong predictor of mortality. However, in this review, we critique the theory that SAHL indicates an oxygen debt or hypoperfusion or tissue hypoxia or `anaerobic glycolysis’. We provide evidence that metabolic changes can account for SAHL and that such evidence is recurrent, logical and consistent and not yet contradicted by any empirical observation. SAHL may thus reflect severity of illness and the degree of activation of the stress response (and release of epinephrine). If the metabolic theory of SAHL is correct, then in a metaphorical sense SAHL may be the cellular equivalent of fever and may represent the impact of major changes in numerous metabolic processes. Under stress, lactate is a source of energy in the same cell where it is produced and also in other cells where it can be used as an important fuel for oxidation and glucose generation. Fluid resuscitation- or hemodynamic-based protocols may not directly affect lactate if the mechanisms of its production are not directly targeted by such activities. Similarly, lactate may not necessarily indicate the need to deliberately increase calculated systemic oxygen delivery because it may not represent an oxygen deficiency. In contrast, if the tissue hypoxia theory of SAHL is correct, then the therapeutic implications are very different. It is possible, maybe likely, that both (tissue hypoxia and metabolic adaptation) explain SAHL in different patients at different times or occur simultaneously to a degree that changes from patient to patient and according to illness severity, genetics and interventions, in a way that we do not yet understand. The extraordinary complexity of lactate makes it impossible, at this stage, to achieve such deeper understanding. Until then, clinicians should be aware of such complexity and make therapeutic choices on the basis of such knowledge.

Abbreviations

CoA: 

Coenzyme A

DCA: 

Dichloroacetate

DO2: 

Oxygen delivery

HIF: 

Hypoxia-inducible factor

LDH: 

Lactate dehydrogenase

MCT: 

Monocarboxylate transport protein

mLOC: 

mitochondrial lactate oxidation complex

O2ER: 

Oxygen extraction ratio

PCr: 

Phosphocreatine

PDH: 

Pyruvate dehydrogenase

PO2: 

Partial pressure of oxygen

SAHL: 

Sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia

SvO2: 

Mixed venous oxygen saturation

VO2: 

Oxygen consumption

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital de Sant Pau, Carrer de Sant Quintí 89, Barcelona, 08026, Spain
(2)
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, 3084, Victoria, Australia
(3)
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, 23501, VA, USA
(4)
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Melbourne, 3004, Victoria, Australia

References

  1. Angus DC, Pereira CA, Silva E: Epidemiology of severe sepsis around the world. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2006, 6: 207-212. 10.2174/187153006777442332.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Vincent JL, Taccone F, Schmit X: Classification, incidence, and outcomes of sepsis and multiple organ failure. Contrib Nephrol. 2007, 156: 64-74. 10.1159/000102071.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Jones AE, Brown MD, Trzeciak S, Shapiro NI, Garrett JS, Heffner AC, Kline JA: The effect of a quantitative resuscitation strategy on mortality in patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2008, 36: 2734-2739. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186f839.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Schoonderbeek FJ, Sleeswijk Visser SJ, van der Klooster JM, Lima AP, Willemsen SP, Bakker J: Early lactate-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010, 182: 752-761. 10.1164/rccm.200912-1918OC.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Levy B, Sadoune LO, Gelot AM, Bollaert PE, Nabet P, Larcan A: Evolution of lactate/pyruvate and arterial ketone body ratios in the early course of catecholamine-treated septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2000, 28: 114-119. 10.1097/00003246-200001000-00019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Shapiro NI, Howell MD, Talmor D, Nathanson LA, Lisbon A, Wolfe RE, Weiss JW: Serum lactate as a predictor of mortality in emergency department patients with infection. Ann Emerg Med. 2005, 45: 524-528. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.12.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Nichol A, Bailey M, Egi M, Pettila V, French C, Stachowski E, Reade MC, Cooper DJ, Bellomo R: Dynamic lactate indices as predictors of outcome in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2011, 15: R242-10.1186/cc10497.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wong HR, Lindsell CJ, Pettila V, Meyer NJ, Thair SA, Karlsson S, Russell JA, Fjell CD, Boyd JH, Ruokonen E, Shashaty MG, Christie JD, Hart KW, Lahni P, Walley KR: A multibiomarker-based outcome risk stratification model for adult septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2014, 42: 781-789. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Nichol AD, Egi M, Pettila V, Bellomo R, French C, Hart G, Davies A, Stachowski E, Reade MC, Bailey M, Cooper DJ: Relative hyperlactatemia and hospital mortality in critically ill patients: a retrospective multi-centre study. Crit Care. 2010, 14: R25-10.1186/cc8888.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Wacharasint P, Nakada TA, Boyd JH, Russell JA, Walley KR: Normal-range blood lactate concentration in septic shock is prognostic and predictive. Shock. 2012, 38: 4-10. 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318254d41a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Sterling SA, Puskarich MA, Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, Kline JA, Summers RL, Jones AE: Characteristics and outcomes of patients with vasoplegic versus tissue dysoxic septic shock. Shock. 2013, 40: 11-14. 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318298836d.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb SA, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R: Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013, 41: 580-637. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Connor H, Woods HF: Quantitative aspects of L(+)-lactate metabolism in human beings. Ciba Found Symp. 1982, 87: 214-234.Google Scholar
  14. Van Hall G: Lactate kinetics in human tissues at rest and during exercise. Acta Physiol. 2010, 199: 499-508. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02122.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Levraut J, Ciebiera JP, Jambou P, Ichai C, Labib Y, Grimaud D: Effect of continuous venovenous hemofiltration with dialysis on lactate clearance in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1997, 25: 58-62. 10.1097/00003246-199701000-00013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Consoli A, Nurjhan N, Reilly JJ, Bier DM, Gerich JE: Contribution of liver and skeletal muscle to alanine and lactate metabolism in humans. Am J Physiol. 1990, 259: E677-E684.Google Scholar
  17. Kreisberg RA, Pennington LF, Boshell BR: Lactate turnover and gluconeogenesis in normal and obese humans. Effect of starvation. Diabetes. 1970, 19: 53-63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerich JE, Meyer C, Woerle HJ, Stumvoll M: Renal gluconeogenesis: its importance in human glucose homeostasis. Diabetes Care. 2001, 24: 382-391. 10.2337/diacare.24.2.382.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller BF, Fattor JA, Jacobs KA, Horning MA, Navazio F, Lindinger MI, Brooks GA: Lactate and glucose interactions during rest and exercise in men: effect of exogenous lactate infusion. J Physiol. 2002, 544: 963-975. 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.027128.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Mazzeo RS, Brooks GA, Schoeller DA, Budinger TF: Disposal of blood [1-13C]lactate in humans during rest and exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1986, 60: 232-241.Google Scholar
  21. Jorfeldt L: Metabolism of L(plus)-lactate in human skeletal muscle during exercise. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1970, 338: 1-67.Google Scholar
  22. van Hall G: Lactate as a fuel for mitochondrial respiration. Acta Physiol Scand. 2000, 168: 643-656. 10.1046/j.1365-201x.2000.00716.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Richter EA, Kiens B, Saltin B, Christensen NJ, Savard G: Skeletal muscle glucose uptake during dynamic exercise in humans: role of muscle mass. Am J Physiol. 1988, 254: E555-E561.Google Scholar
  24. Hashimoto T, Hussien R, Brooks GA: Colocalization of MCT1, CD147, and LDH in mitochondrial inner membrane of L6 muscle cells: evidence of a mitochondrial lactate oxidation complex. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006, 290: E1237-E1244. 10.1152/ajpendo.00594.2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hashimoto T, Brooks GA: Mitochondrial lactate oxidation complex and an adaptive role for lactate production. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008, 40: 486-494. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31815fcb04.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Brooks GA: Cell-cell and intracellular lactate shuttles. J Physiol. 2009, 587: 5591-5600. 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.178350.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hashimoto T, Hussien R, Oommen S, Gohil K, Brooks GA: Lactate sensitive transcription factor network in L6 cells: activation of MCT1 and mitochondrial biogenesis. FASEB J. 2007, 21: 2602-2612. 10.1096/fj.07-8174com.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Beadle RM, Frenneaux M: Modification of myocardial substrate utilisation: a new therapeutic paradigm in cardiovascular disease. Heart. 2010, 96: 824-830. 10.1136/hrt.2009.190256.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kline JA, Thornton LR, Lopaschuk GD, Barbee RW, Watts JA: Lactate improves cardiac efficiency after hemorrhagic shock. Shock. 2000, 14: 215-221. 10.1097/00024382-200014020-00023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Stanley WC: Myocardial lactate metabolism during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991, 23: 920-924. 10.1249/00005768-199108000-00006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bergman BC, Tsvetkova T, Lowes B, Wolfel EE: Myocardial glucose and lactate metabolism during rest and atrial pacing in humans. J Physiol. 2009, 587: 2087-2099. 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.168286.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Nalos M, Leverve XM, Huang SJ, Weisbrodt L, Parkin R, Seppelt IM, Ting I, McLean AS: Half-molar sodium lactate infusion improves cardiac performance in acute heart failure: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. Crit Care. 2014, 18: R48-10.1186/cc13793.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Revelly JP, Tappy L, Martinez A, Bollmann M, Cayeux MC, Berger MM, Chiolero RL: Lactate and glucose metabolism in severe sepsis and cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med. 2005, 33: 2235-2240. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000181525.99295.8F.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Barthelmes D, Jakob SM, Laitinen S, Rahikainen S, Ahonen H, Takala J: Effect of site of lactate infusion on regional lactate exchange in pigs. Br J Anaesth. 2010, 105: 627-634. 10.1093/bja/aeq214.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. van Hall G, Stromstad M, Rasmussen P, Jans O, Zaar M, Gam C, Quistorff B, Secher NH, Nielsen HB: Blood lactate is an important energy source for the human brain. J Cerebr Blood Flow Metab. 2009, 29: 1121-1129. 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Dienel GA: Brain lactate metabolism: the discoveries and the controversies. J Cerebr Blood Flow Metab. 2012, 32: 1107-1138. 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.175.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Wyss MT, Jolivet R, Buck A, Magistretti PJ, Weber B: In vivo evidence for lactate as a neuronal energy source. J Neurosci. 2011, 31: 7477-7485. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0415-11.2011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Magistretti PJ: Neuron-glia metabolic coupling and plasticity. J Exp Biol. 2006, 209: 2304-2311. 10.1242/jeb.02208.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Huckabee WE: Abnormal resting blood lactate. I. The significance of hyperlactatemia in hospitalized patients. Am J Med. 1961, 30: 840-848. 10.1016/0002-9343(61)90172-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Weil MH, Afifi AA: Experimental and clinical studies on lactate and pyruvate as indicators of the severity of acute circulatory failure (shock). Circulation. 1970, 41: 989-1001. 10.1161/01.CIR.41.6.989.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Nguyen HB, Rivers EP, Knoblich BP, Jacobsen G, Muzzin A, Ressler JA, Tomlanovich MC: Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004, 32: 1637-1642. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000132904.35713.A7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Fuller BM, Dellinger RP: Lactate as a hemodynamic marker in the critically ill. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012, 18: 267-272. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283532b8a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Boekstegers P, Weidenhofer S, Kapsner T, Werdan K: Skeletal muscle partial pressure of oxygen in patients with sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1994, 22: 640-650. 10.1097/00003246-199404000-00021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Sair M, Etherington PJ, Peter Winlove C, Evans TW: Tissue oxygenation and perfusion in patients with systemic sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2001, 29: 1343-1349. 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Levy B, Gibot S, Franck P, Cravoisy A, Bollaert PE: Relation between muscle Na?+?K?+?ATPase activity and raised lactate concentrations in septic shock: a prospective study. Lancet. 2005, 365: 871-875. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71045-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. VanderMeer TJ, Wang H, Fink MP: Endotoxemia causes ileal mucosal acidosis in the absence of mucosal hypoxia in a normodynamic porcine model of septic shock. Crit Care Med. 1995, 23: 1217-1226. 10.1097/00003246-199507000-00011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Rosser DM, Stidwill RP, Jacobson D, Singer M: Oxygen tension in the bladder epithelium rises in both high and low cardiac output endotoxemic sepsis. J Appl Physiol. 1995, 79: 1878-1882.Google Scholar
  48. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE: Reevaluation of the role of cellular hypoxia and bioenergetic failure in sepsis. JAMA. 1992, 267: 1503-1510. 10.1001/jama.1992.03480110079038.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Regueira T, Djafarzadeh S, Brandt S, Gorrasi J, Borotto E, Porta F, Takala J, Bracht H, Shaw S, Lepper PM, Jakob SM: Oxygen transport and mitochondrial function in porcine septic shock, cardiogenic shock, and hypoxaemia. Acta Anaesth Scand. 2012, 56: 846-859. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02706.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Textoris J, Beaufils N, Quintana G, Ben Lassoued A, Zieleskiewicz L, Wiramus S, Blasco V, Lesavre N, Martin C, Gabert J, Leone M: Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF1alpha) gene expression in human shock states. Crit Care. 2012, 16: R120-10.1186/cc11414.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Opdam H, Bellomo R: Oxygen consumption and lactate release by the lung after cardiopulmonary bypass and during septic shock. Crit Care Resusc. 2000, 2: 181-187.Google Scholar
  52. Gilles RJ, D'Orio V, Ciancabilla F, Carlier PG: In vivo 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of skeletal muscle energetics in endotoxemic rats: a prospective, randomized study. Crit Care Med. 1994, 22: 499-505. 10.1097/00003246-199403000-00022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Alamdari N, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Murton AJ, Gardiner SM, Bennett T, Layfield R, Greenhaff PL: Temporal changes in the involvement of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex in muscle lactate accumulation during lipopolysaccharide infusion in rats. J Physiol. 2008, 586: 1767-1775. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.149625.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Brealey D, Brand M, Hargreaves I, Heales S, Land J, Smolenski R, Davies NA, Cooper CE, Singer M: Association between mitochondrial dysfunction and severity and outcome of septic shock. Lancet. 2002, 360: 219-223. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09459-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Jahoor F, Shangraw RE, Miyoshi H, Wallfish H, Herndon DN, Wolfe RR: Role of insulin and glucose oxidation in mediating the protein catabolism of burns and sepsis. Am J Physiol. 1989, 257: E323-E331.Google Scholar
  56. Stacpoole PW, Nagaraja NV, Hutson AD: Efficacy of dichloroacetate as a lactate-lowering drug. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003, 43: 683-691. 10.1177/0091270003254637.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Ronco JJ, Fenwick JC, Tweeddale MG, Wiggs BR, Phang PT, Cooper DJ, Cunningham KF, Russell JA, Walley KR: Identification of the critical oxygen delivery for anaerobic metabolism in critically ill septic and nonseptic humans. JAMA. 1993, 270: 1724-1730. 10.1001/jama.1993.03510140084034.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Ronco JJ, Fenwick JC, Wiggs BR, Phang PT, Russell JA, Tweeddale MG: Oxygen consumption is independent of increases in oxygen delivery by dobutamine in septic patients who have normal or increased plasma lactate. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993, 147: 25-31. 10.1164/ajrccm/147.1.25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Mira JP, Fabre JE, Baigorri F, Coste J, Annat G, Artigas A, Nitenberg G, Dhainaut JF: Lack of oxygen supply dependency in patients with severe sepsis. A study of oxygen delivery increased by military antishock trouser and dobutamine. Chest. 1994, 106: 1524-1531. 10.1378/chest.106.5.1524.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Astiz ME, Rackow EC, Kaufman B, Falk JL, Weil MH: Relationship of oxygen delivery and mixed venous oxygenation to lactic acidosis in patients with sepsis and acute myocardial infarction. Crit Care Med. 1988, 16: 655-658. 10.1097/00003246-198807000-00001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Uehara M, Plank LD, Hill GL: Components of energy expenditure in patients with severe sepsis and major trauma: a basis for clinical care. Crit Care Med. 1999, 27: 1295-1302. 10.1097/00003246-199907000-00015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Kreymann G, Grosser S, Buggisch P, Gottschall C, Matthaei S, Greten H: Oxygen consumption and resting metabolic rate in sepsis, sepsis syndrome, and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 1993, 21: 1012-1019. 10.1097/00003246-199307000-00015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Subramaniam A, McPhee M, Nagappan R: Predicting energy expenditure in sepsis: Harris-Benedict and Schofield equations versus the Weir derivation. Crit Care Resusc. 2012, 14: 202-210.Google Scholar
  64. Hayes MA, Timmins AC, Yau EH, Palazzo M, Hinds CJ, Watson D: Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery in the treatment of critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 1994, 330: 1717-1722. 10.1056/NEJM199406163302404.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Marik PE, Sibbald WJ: Effect of stored-blood transfusion on oxygen delivery in patients with sepsis. JAMA. 1993, 269: 3024-3029. 10.1001/jama.1993.03500230106037.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Cortez DO, Taccone FS, Vincent JL: Short acting beta-blocker administration in patients with septic shock. JAMA. 2014, 311: 735-736. 10.1001/jama.2014.324.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Levy B: Lactate and shock state: the metabolic view. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006, 12: 315-321. 10.1097/01.ccx.0000235208.77450.15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. James JH, Luchette FA, McCarter FD, Fischer JE: Lactate is an unreliable indicator of tissue hypoxia in injury or sepsis. Lancet. 1999, 354: 505-508. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)91132-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Bundgaard H, Kjeldsen K, Suarez Krabbe K, van Hall G, Simonsen L, Qvist J, Hansen CM, Moller K, Fonsmark L, Lav Madsen P, Klarlund Pedersen B: Endotoxemia stimulates skeletal muscle Na?+?-K?+?-ATPase and raises blood lactate under aerobic conditions in humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003, 284: H1028-H1034.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Levy B, Mansart A, Montemont C, Gibot S, Mallie JP, Regnault V, Lecompte T, Lacolley P: Myocardial lactate deprivation is associated with decreased cardiovascular performance, decreased myocardial energetics, and early death in endotoxic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2007, 33: 495-502. 10.1007/s00134-006-0523-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Wutrich Y, Barraud D, Conrad M, Cravoisy-Popovic A, Nace L, Bollaert PE, Levy B, Gibot S: Early increase in arterial lactate concentration under epinephrine infusion is associated with a better prognosis during shock. Shock. 2010, 34: 4-9. 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181ce2d23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Bellomo R, Kellum JA, Pinsky MR: Transvisceral lactate fluxes during early endotoxemia. Chest. 1996, 110: 198-204. 10.1378/chest.110.1.198.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Johnson ML, Emhoff CA, Horning MA, Brooks GA: Transpulmonary lactate shuttle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2012, 302: R143-R149. 10.1152/ajpregu.00402.2011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. De Backer D, Creteur J, Silva E, Vincent JL: The hepatosplanchnic area is not a common source of lactate in patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2001, 29: 256-261. 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Glassford NJ, Farley KJ, Warrillow S, Bellomo R: Liver transplantation rapidly stops cerebral ammonia uptake in fulminant hepatic failure. Crit Care Resusc. 2011, 13: 113-118.Google Scholar
  76. Jones AE, Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, Arnold RC, Claremont HA, Kline JA: Lactate clearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2010, 303: 739-746. 10.1001/jama.2010.158.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Astiz ME, Rackow EC, Falk JL, Kaufman BS, Weil MH: Oxygen delivery and consumption in patients with hyperdynamic septic shock. Crit Care Med. 1987, 15: 26-28. 10.1097/00003246-198701000-00005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Silance PG, Vincent JL: Oxygen extraction in patients with sepsis and heart failure: another look at clinical studies. Clin Intensive Care. 1994, 5: 4-14.Google Scholar
  79. Friedman G, De Backer D, Shahla M, Vincent JL: Oxygen supply dependency can characterize septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 1998, 24: 118-123. 10.1007/s001340050531.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Taccone FS, Su F, De Deyne C, Abdellhai A, Pierrakos C, He X, Donadello K, Dewitte O, Vincent JL, De Backer D: Sepsis is associated with altered cerbral microcirculation and tissue hypoxia in experimental peritonitis. Crit Care Med. 2014, 42: e114-e122. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a641b8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Rimachi R, Bruzzi de Carvahlo F, Orellano-Jimenez C, Cotton F, Vincent JL, DeBacker D: Lactate/pyruvate ratio as a marker of tissue hypoxia in circulatory and septic shock. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012, 40: 427-432.Google Scholar
  82. DeBacker D, Creteur J, Noordally O, Samil N, Gulbis B, Vincent JL: Does hepato-splanchnic VO2/DO2 dependency exist in critically ill septic patients?. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998, 157: 1219-1225. 10.1164/ajrccm.157.4.9705075.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Hernandez G, Boerma EC, Dubin A, Bruhn A, Koopmans M, Edul VK, Ruiz C, Castro R, Pozo MO, Pedreros C, Veas E, Fuentealba A, Kattan E, Rovegno M, Ince C: Severe abnormalities in microvascular perfused vessel density are associated to organ dysfunctions and mortality and can be predicted by hyperlactatemia and norepinephrine requirements in septic shock patients.J Crit Care 2013, 28. 538.e9-14.,Google Scholar
  84. Ince C: The microcirculation in the motor of sepsis. Crit Care. 2005, 9 (Suppl 4): S13-S19. 10.1186/cc3753.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Ellis CG, Bateman RM, Sharpe MD, Sibbald WJ, Gill R: Effect of a maldistribution of microvascular blood flow on capillary O2extraction in sepsis.Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002, 282:H156-H164.,Google Scholar

Copyright

© Garcia-Alvarez et al. licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. The licensee has exclusive rights to distribute this article, in any medium, for 12 months following its publication. After this time, the article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535