Skip to main content

National survey of protective eye care practices in the critically ill

Introduction

Critically ill patients with inadequate lid closure are susceptible to developing exposure keratopathy. Protective measures can prevent this and reduce the risk of subsequent microbial keratitis and irreversible visual loss. Of two published surveys [1, 2], one was carried out before there was any evidence-based research in this area and the other did not address which methods were in use in ICUs. This study aims to describe the current eye care methods used in ICUs in England, the perceived incidence of eye complications, their nature and the effectiveness of protocols in use.

Methods

A team of researchers telephoned all general ICUs and other specialty critical care units in England caring for sedated, ventilated patients and asked a supervising nurse questions from a questionnaire piloted earlier in London.

Results

Two hundred and seventeen out of 267 ICUs (81%) participated. One hundred and thirty out of 217 (60%) ICUs had an eye care protocol. Sixty-six per cent of units with protocols assessed lid closure compared with 65% of those without. Geliperm application was the most common protective therapy (106 units, 49%), followed by Lacrilube (76 units, 35%). Most ICUs used a combination of methods. The total estimated incidence of ocular complications in the last year was 502. The most recent complications witnessed included corneal ulceration (23 cases), microbial keratitis (11) and chemosis (23). Cases of severe visual loss were caused by anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy following prone positioning (two cases) and microbial keratitis in a patient's only functioning eye.

Conclusions

There is a need for protocols that encourage proper eyelid position assessment, effective protection of the ocular surface and referral to ophthalmologists in the event of any complications or any loss of corneal clarity.

References

  1. 1.

    Farrell M, Wray F: Eye care for ventilated patients. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 1993, 9: 137-141. 10.1016/0964-3397(93)90055-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    King DJ, Healy M: Prevention of eye disease in intensive care - a telephone survey. Intensive Care Med. 2003, 29: 15S-

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Kam.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kam, R., Haldar, S., Papamichael, E. et al. National survey of protective eye care practices in the critically ill. Crit Care 15, P538 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9958

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ocular Surface
  • Critical Care Unit
  • Corneal Ulceration
  • Keratopathy
  • Severe Visual Loss