- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Do scoring systems predict mortality following emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? The Norwich experience
© Kumar and Nortje 2011
- Published: 1 March 2011
- Mortality Rate
- National Average
- Aortic Aneurysm
- Large Dataset
- Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
APACHE II scores  and Glasgow Aneurysm Scores (GAS)  are commonly used in ICUs to predict mortality. These scoring systems (scores α mortality), when applied to postoperative emergency open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair patients, yield varying results. We applied these scoring systems to our patients to establish their predictive value in our clinical setting.
This retrospective audit included patients who underwent emergency open AAA repair and were admitted to our ICU, over a period of 1 year (November 2008 to November 2009). These patients were identified from our local ICU database (Metavision®) and scores (APACHE II and GAS) were calculated for each of these patients. The mortality rates were compared with the national average .
APACHE II scores seem to be more predictive of our unit AAA mortality rates than GAS scores. We aim to apply these scores to a larger dataset and also determine possible reasons for improved survival.
- Knaus WA, et al.: APACHE: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med 1985, 13: 818-829.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Samt AK, et al.: Glasgow aneurysm score. Cardiovasc Surg 1994, 2: 41-44.Google Scholar
- National Vascular Database 2009[http://www.vascularsociety.org.uk/national-vascular-database]
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.