- Poster presentation
- Open Access
New prognosis inflammatory and nutritional indexes: comparison with the Prognostic Inflammatory and Nutritional Index as reference index
© Ziegler et al. 2011
- Published: 1 March 2011
- Serum Protein
- Spearman Rank
- Acute Inflammation
- Current Clinical Practice
The Prognostic Inflammatory and Nutritional Index (PINI) was previously developed to improve the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with inflammation and/or malnutrition in terms of morbidity and mortality risk, especially in ICU patients . The formula includes the determination of four serum protein concentrations: PINI = (C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/l) × orosomucoid (OROSO) (g/l))/(albumin (ALB) (g/l) × transthyretin (TTR) (g/l)). Since CRP may be considered now as the gold standard for assessing and monitoring inflammatory states in clinical practice, OROSO is generally unavailable for PINI calculation. Elsewhere, the strong and rapid changes in CRP levels (0 to 600 mg/l) in acute inflammation may lead to an overestimation of the risk of morbidity and mortality suggested by the PINI. The aim of this study was to evaluate alternative biological formulas by removing OROSO from the PINI and replacing CRP value by its logarithm (Log), in order to reduce the mathematical weighting of this biomarker.
Blood samples of 106 patients hospitalized in intensive care, gastrointestinal surgery, vascular and thoracic surgery, pneumology, gastroenterology or internal medicine units were drawn to measure serum concentrations of ALB, TTR, CRP and OROSO. Proteins were determined using an immunonephelometry method (BN2; Siemens, Germany). The correlations between six new formulas and the PINI were studied - that is, CRP/ALB × TTR, Log(CRP)/ALB × TTR, CRP/TTR, Log(CRP)/TTR, CRP/ALB and Log(CRP)/ALB - using the Spearman rank test.
The relations obtained between the PINI and the experimental formulas were linear (y = ax + b) with formulas without Log and nonlinear when a Log was used (y = ax2 + bx + c or y = log(x) + b). All six formulas were correlated with the PINI (0.78 <R < 0.94, P < 0.0001). CRP/ALB × TTR, Log(CRP)/ALB and CRP/TTR showed the highest correlations, with R = 0.94, 0.91 and 0.90, respectively. The less elevated correlation was observed using CRP/ALB (R = 0.78).
Among the six new formulas compared with the PINI, that omitting only OROSO provided the best performance. The control of CRP weighting obtained with Log(CRP) in the formula Log(CRP)/ALB appears promising in current clinical practice, since it involves the most often used serum proteins to assess inflammatory and nutritional status.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.