Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Agreement of pain assessment between nurses and patients in the Emergency Department

  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Critical Care201115 (Suppl 1) :P457

  • Published:


  • Emergency Department
  • Pain Intensity
  • Numeric Rate Scale
  • Nursing Practice
  • Pain Assessment


Pain is one of the most common reasons why patients visit the Emergency Department (ED) and is a healthcare problem for patients [1, 2]. The purpose of this study was to determine the agreement between patient self-reported pain intensity and nurse pain assessment in the ED.


A purposive sample of 100 patients and 36 nurses in the triage and clinical area within the ED was selected from 5Azar Hospital in Gorgan. The questionnaire included two components: participant characteristics and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). A questionnaire was administered twice to each patient. In triage the patients were asked to rate their pain intensity. Separately, the nurses assessed the patient's pain intensity. This process was repeated with the same patients after referring them to a clinical area within the ED, but the nurses were different. Gathered data were described by frequency distribution tables and analyzed by Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney and Spearman tests. P < 0.05 was considered significant.


Most of the patients were male (61%), with mean age of 39.16 ± 16.83 years. Fifty-four percent of the patients had chronic pain. Most of them had a diagnosis of abdominal pain and chest pain (61%). In the triage, the mean nurses' pain intensity score was significantly lower than patients' score (7.60 ± 2.1 vs. 9.13 ± 1.26), as significant differences in mean scores were observed (P < 0.001). In the clinical area, patients' scores were also significantly higher than nurses 7.36 ± 2.56 and 5.94 ± 2.33, respectively (P < 0.001). Nurses significantly underestimated pain on the NRS. See Table 1.
Table 1

Patients' (n = 100) and nurses' (n = 36) pain intensity scores


Triage area

Clinical area



7.60 (2.1)

5.94 (2.33)

6.77 (2.36)


9.13 (1.26)

7.36 (2.56)

8.24 (2.20)


r = 0.612

r = 0.373

r = 0.528

Data presented as mean (SD).


The findings have implications for the management of patients' pain by highlighting the need for more accurate pain assessment. Further research is required to elucidate the way in which nurses and patients conceptualize pain and to understand better the process of pain assessment in clinical nursing practice.

Authors’ Affiliations

Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran


  1. Eder SC, et al.: Am J Emerg Med. 2003, 21: 253-257. 10.1016/S0735-6757(03)00041-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Marquié L, et al.: Acute Pain. 2008, 10: 31-37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Modanloo et al. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.