Skip to main content

A comparison of four methods to define timing of acute kidney injury

Introduction

RIFLE provides standardized criteria for defining acute kidney injury (AKI) [1]. It is based on changes in serum creatinine (sCr), in relation to a premorbid sCr, and on urine output. When premorbid sCr is unknown, baseline sCr is estimated. Often only sCr is used (RIFLEcreat). Thus there are four methods for defining AKI: actual RIFLE, actual RIFLEcreat, estimated RIFLE and estimated RIFLEcreat. There is much interest for biomarkers predicting early AKI [2]. Critical for determining a biomarker's performance of AKI is the diagnosis of the first day of AKI (AKI-0). We compared the impact of four AKI definitions on determining AKI-0.

Methods

An observational study for 6 months in ICU patients admitted ≥48 hours. For the first 7 days we calculated daily the number of patients diagnosed with AKI-0 using the four AKI definitions.

Results

One hundred and one patients (39%) had a known premorbid sCr. Mean age and APACHE was respectively 64 (13) and 22 (7). Figure 1 (overleaf) shows the distribution of AKI-0.

Figure 1
figure1

Distribution of AKI-0.

Conclusions

The early diagnosis of AKI is significantly reduced when urine output criteria are neglected in the RIFLE definition, and also when baseline sCr is estimated. This may significantly impact the assessment of biomarker performance.

References

  1. 1.

    Bellomo R, et al.: Crit Care. 2004, 8: 204-212. 10.1186/cc2872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Endre ZH, et al.: Nephrology. 2008, 13: 91-98. 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2007.00905.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to KA Wlodzimirow.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wlodzimirow, K., Abu-Hanna, A. & Bouman, C. A comparison of four methods to define timing of acute kidney injury. Crit Care 15, P104 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9524

Download citation

Keywords

  • Public Health
  • Creatinine
  • Observational Study
  • Serum Creatinine
  • Early Diagnosis