Open Access

Comparing different thrombolytic dosing regimens for treatment of acute pulmonary embolism

Critical Care201014:323

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9287

Published: 15 October 2010

Expanded abstract

Citation

Ch en Wang, Zh enguo Zhai, Yuanhua Yang, Qi Wu, Zhaozhong Cheng, Lirong Liang, Huaping Dai, Kewu Huang, Weixuan Lu, Zhonghe Zhang, Xiansheng Cheng, Ying H Shen, For the China Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Study Group: Chest 2010, 137:254-262. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT00781378.

Background

Optimal dosing of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is important in treating pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE).

Methods

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a 50 mg/2 h rt-PA regimen with a 100 mg/2 h rt-PA regimen in patients with acute PTE.

Design

A prospective, randomized, open label trial.

Setting

A multicenter trial in China.

Subjects

118 patients with acute PTE and either hemodynamic instability or massive pulmonary artery obstruction.

Intervention

Patients were randomly assigned to receive a treatment regimen of either rt-PA at 50 mg/2 h (n = 65) or 100 mg/2 h (n = 53).

Outcomes

The efficacy was determined by observing the improvements of right ventricular dysfunctions (RVDs) on echocardiograms, lung perfusion defects on ventilation perfusion lung scans, and pulmonary artery obstructions on CT angiograms. The adverse events, including death, bleeding, and PTE recurrence, was also evaluated.

Results

Progressive improvements in RVDs, lung perfusion defects, and pulmonary artery obstructions were found to be similar in both treatment groups. This is true for patients with either hemodynamic instability or massive pulmonary artery obstruction. Three (6%) patients in the rt-PA 100 mg/2 h group and one (2%) in the rt-PA 50 mg/2 h group died as the result of either PTE or bleeding. Importantly, the 50 mg/2 h rt-PA regimen resulted in less bleeding tendency than the 100 mg/2 h regimen (3% vs. 10%), especially in patients with a body weight, 65 kg (14.8% vs. 41.2%, P = 0.049). No fatal recurrent PTE was found in either group.

Conclusions

Compared with the 100 mg/2 h regimen, the 50 mg/2 h rt-PA regimen exhibits similar efficacy and perhaps better safety in patients with acute PTE. These findings support the notion that optimizing rt-PA dosing is worthwhile when treating patients with PTE.

Commentary

Acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a disease with variable clinical severity that can range from no symptoms to severe hypoxia, hypotension, right heart failure and death. Thrombolytic therapy is known to improve physiologic parameters and right heart function in PTE. This therapy is routinely used in patients who have hemodynamic instability. However, its role in patients with large PTE in the absence of hemodynamic instability, particularly in the subset with right ventricular strain, is controversial. Few large randomized clinical trials(RCTs) have been conducted to assess efficacy of thrombolytic therapy for different subgroups of patients with PTE and to compare different dosing regimens, Current recommendations are largely based on results of observational studies or meta-analyses of small RCT [13].

Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is currently the most commonly used thrombolytic therapy for PTE. Similar to most thrombolytic agents, rt-PA carries a significant dose-dependent risk of bleeding, and it is the most common adverse effect associated with thrombolytic therapy for PTE. In a retrospective analysis of 104 patients with PTE who receive rt-PA, 20 patients (19%) had major bleeding [4]. The most devastating complication is intracranial bleed and it occurs in up to 3% of patients. Thus, optimal dosing to maximize benefits and minimize bleeding complications is important.

Few studies had compared different thrombolytic doses for PTE [5, 6]. For example, Goldhaber and colleagues compared 0.6 mg/kg over 15 min (maximum dose of 50 mg) and 100 mg over 2 hours in 90 patients. No significant differences were detected between both groups with regards to bleeding complications and efficacy, as measured by perfusion lung scans, pulmonary angiograms and echocardiograms.

With this background, Wang and colleagues conducted a randomized, multicenter study to compare low vs. high dose rt-PA in treatment of acute massive PTE [7]. Patients were included if they were 18 years or older and present with symptoms of acute PTE within 15 days of enrolment. This study enrolled patients with large PTE, as evidence by hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure [BP] <90 mmHg or drop in systolic BP of at least 40 mmHg for at least 15 minutes), cardiogenic shock or those with anatomically massive PTE (CT scan showed occlusion of more than 2 lobar arteries, or V/Q scan showed occlusion >7 segments combined with right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography). For sample size calculation, the authors calculated the number of patient needed to demonstrate a reduction in the CT obstruction score by 10 points. A total number of 118 patients were enrolled (65 in the low dose and 53 in the high dose group). The primary endpoints were efficacy of thrombolysis, as measured by improvement in right ventricular function by echocardiogram, improvement in perfusion by V/Q scan and improvement in CT obstruction score. No differences in efficacy were observed between the two groups. Secondary endpoints were safety endpoints, including bleeding risk. Bleeding events were categorized into major and minor events. Major events included bleeding leading to death, caused a drop in hemoglobin >2 g/dl, or required transfusion more than 400 cc blood and intra cranial hemorrhage. Minor events included bleeding that led to a drop of less than 2 g/dl in hemoglobin. Other secondary endpoints were recurrence of PTE and death. Although bleeding risk was no different, in subgroup analysis stratified by body weight, the risk of total number of bleeding episodes were less with the low dose regimen than in the high dose regimen, especially in patients with body weight <65 kg (14.8% in the low dose vs. 41.2% in the high dose group, P = 0.049) or BMI <24 (8.7% in the low dose vs. 42.9% in the high dose group, P = 0.014).

To date, this study is the largest one to compare different dosing regimens of rt-PA for acute PTE. The subgroup analysis according to body weight suggests that using weight-based dosing may reduce bleeding complications. However the study has limitations. The authors chose a surrogate endpoint and its clinical significance is unclear. For example, it is difficult to estimate the clinical significance of a 1 point decrease in the CT obstruction score. Although mortality would be an important outcome measure, it was a secondary outcome in this study and there were only a few deaths.

This study highlights the importance of considering alternative study designs to compare different dose regimens of thrombolytic therapy for PTE. For instance, lower dose may have similar efficacy but lower bleeding complications, thus such studies should be designed as non-inferiority or equivalence trial, with the hypothesis that clinical efficacy would be similar but bleeding risk would be lower.

In conclusion, this trial did not prove differences in efficacy between low dose and high dose rt-PA regimens. The secondary analyses showing that lower dose of rt-PA may lower the risk of bleeding suggest a need for additional studies to use weight-based regimens to reduce risk of bleeding.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

References

  1. Capstick T, Henry MT: Efficacy of thrombolytic agents in the treatment of pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J. 2005, 26: 864-874. 10.1183/09031936.05.00002505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnelli G, Becattini C, Kirschstein T: Thrombolysis vs heparin in the treatment of pulmonary embolism: a clinical outcome-based meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2002, 162: 2537-2541. 10.1001/archinte.162.22.2537.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wan S, Quinlan DJ, Agnelli G, Eikelboom JW: Thrombolysis compared with heparin for the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Circulation. 2004, 110: 744-749. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000137826.09715.9C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fiumara K, Kucher N, Fanikos J, Goldhaber SZ: Predictors of major hemorrhage following fibrinolysis for acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 2006, 97: 127-129. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Goldhaber SZ, Agnelli G, Levine MN: Reduced dose bolus alteplase vs conventional alteplase infusion for pulmonary embolism thrombolysis. An international multicenter randomized trial. The Bolus Alteplase Pulmonary Embolism Group. Chest. 1994, 106: 718-724. 10.1378/chest.106.3.718.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Levine M, Hirsh J, Weitz J, Cruickshank M, Neemeh J, Turpie AG, Gent M: A randomized trial of a single bolus dosage regimen of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Chest. 1990, 98: 1473-1479. 10.1378/chest.98.6.1473.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang C, Zhai Z, Yang Y, Wu Q, Cheng Z, Liang L, Dai H, Huang K, Lu W, Zhang Z, Cheng X, Shen YH: Efficacy and safety of low dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator for the treatment of acute pulmonary thromboembolism: a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial. Chest. 2010, 137: 254-262. 10.1378/chest.09-0765.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2010

Advertisement