- Poster presentation
- Published:
Severity of illness scoring systems in community-acquired Legionella pneumonia
Critical Care volume 14, Article number: P25 (2010)
Introduction
Prognostic and severity-of-illness scoring systems are valuable tools for predicting mortality and choosing the site of care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) [1]. Legionnaires' disease (LD) is a pneumonia caused by Legionella spp. and carries a higher mortality rate (5 to 30%) than CAP of most other etiologies. The aim of our study was to evaluate five scoring systems commonly used in CAP for predicting mortality in patients with Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 infection admitted during a large LD outbreak [2, 3].
Methods
Patients with microbiologically verified LD (n= 103) and CAP patients with epidemiological association to the outbreak with no other bacteriological etiology identified (n = 32) were included. A clinical protocol was initiated during an early phase of the outbreak, and clinical and biochemical data were collected from patients on admission to the regional hospital. The five evaluated scoring systems were: pneumonia severity index (PSI), CURB-65 (confusion, uremia, respiratory rate ≥30, low blood pressure, age ≥65) and CRB-65 score, the modified American Thoracic Society (ATS) score, and the IDSA/ATS guidelines. The endpoint was defined as 28-day mortality.
Results
The overall mortality rate was 12% (16/135), and 19% (25/135) were admitted to the ICU. The discriminatory power was highest for PSI, CURB-65 and CRB-65 with area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.79, 0.78, and 0.75, respectively. The AUC of the modified ATS score and IDSA/ATS guidelines were 0.61 and 0.69, respectively. Table 1 shows that a PSI class IV or V, and a CURB-65 and CRB-65 score ≥2 yielded the highest sensitivity for prediction of mortality, but the specificity and positive predictive value was low.
Conclusions
The PSI, the CURB-65 and CRB-65 scores proved sensitive in predicting mortality in patients with Legionella pneumonia admitted during an LD outbreak, but the low specificities and positive predictive values necessitate thorough clinical judgment in patients with a high severity score. The modified ATS score and IDSA/ATS guidelines, which are decision recommendations for ICU admission, were not sensitive in predicting mortality from LD in this study.
References
Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Infectious Diseases Society of America; American Thoracic Society, et al.: Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2007, 44(Suppl 2):S27-S72. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17278083] 10.1086/511159
Nygard K, Werner-Johansen O, Ronsen S, Caugant DA, Simonsen O, Kanestrom A, et al.: An outbreak of legionnaires disease caused by long-distance spread from an industrial air scrubber in Sarpsborg, Norway. Clin Infect Dis 2008, 46: 61-69. 10.1086/524016
Simonsen Ø, Wedege E, Kanestrøm A, Bolstad K, Aaberge IS, Ringstad J: A large outbreak of legionnaires disease: the impact of serological testing. 2010, in press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simonsen, Ø., Ringstad, J. Severity of illness scoring systems in community-acquired Legionella pneumonia. Crit Care 14 (Suppl 2), P25 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9128
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9128