Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Letter
  • Open Access

The role for autopsy in the intensive care unit: technological considerations

Critical Care201014:426

  • Published:


  • Public Health
  • Intensive Care Unit
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Conceptual Framework
  • Excellent Review
In their excellent review De Vlieger and colleagues [1] confirmed the steady decrease of nonforensic autopsies, a well-documented phenomenon in Europe, the United States [2], and Latin America, including Brazil (Figure 1). However, the causes usually attributed to explain this phenomenon, from my point of view, are not causes, but consequences of a change occurring with regard to the concept of disease. The concept of disease should be considered as what truly rules the art and science of medicine, giving direction to procedures as well as yielding pathways to research. Hofmann [3] argues that he contemporary concept of disease is technologically constituted. That means, 'technology provides the physiological, biochemical, and morphological entities that are applied in defining diseases'. I believe the decline of clinical autopsy is the result of a rearrangement of conceptual frameworks working on the contemporary medical rationality [4]. Trying 'to convince' intensive care doctors about the value of autopsies based only on their value per se will not work [5]. The autopsies must aggregate value to the procedure itself: new techniques and new insights, as pointed out by De Vlieger and colleagues. In fact, a new status in medical rationality is needed, otherwise the decline will continue.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Rate of autopsied versus certified deaths at Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo from 1994 to 2006. Modified from [5].


Authors’ Affiliations

Surgical Intensive Care Unit - Gastroenterology Division, School of Medicine, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255 - 9o andar 05403-900 São Paulo, SP, Brasil


  1. De Vlieger GYA, Mahieu EMJL, Meersseman W: Clinical review: What is the role for autopsy in the ICU? Crit Care 2010, 14: 221. 10.1186/cc8925PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Shojania KV, Burton EC: The vanishing nonforensic autopsy. N Engl J Med 2008, 358: 873-875. 10.1056/NEJMp0707996View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hofmann B: The technological invention of disease. Med Humanities 2001, 27: 10-19. 10.1136/mh.27.1.10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton JL, Underwood J: Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy. Lancet 2007, 369: 1471-1480. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60376-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pompilio CE, Vieira JE: The technological invention of disease and the decline of autopsies. Sao Paulo Med J 2008, 126: 71-72. 10.1590/S1516-31802008000200001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© BioMed Central Ltd 2010