Open Access

Ventilation inhomogeneity is one criterion among many in multidimensional PEEP titration

  • Zhanqi Zhao1, 2Email author,
  • Daniel Steinmann2,
  • Inéz Frerichs3,
  • Josef Guttmann2 and
  • Knut Möller1
Critical Care201014:424

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9037

Published: 17 June 2010

We appreciate the commentary from Dr Costa and Dr Amato [1] on our recent study [2], in which we proposed that ventilation inhomogeneity should be regarded as an additional prospective index along with blood gases, lung mechanics and hemodynamics in a multifactorial method to optimize positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at the bedside.

We agree with Costa and Amato that some ventilation heterogeneity may be good [1]. Especially in patients with normal lungs, inhomogeneity of lung perfusion and ventilation along the gravity axis match each other - a match that is essential to optimize gas exchange. Little attention was paid, however, to isogravitational inhomogeneity of pulmonary perfusion and ventilation. When isogravitational inhomogeneity is included in the estimation, the influence of gravity is no longer dominant [3, 4]. Minimizing the ventilation inhomogeneity during PEEP titration is not intended to eliminate inhomogeneity at all (which is impossible by PEEP alone), but rather to find a balance between overdistension and atelectasis. Physiological hetero geneity (good heterogeneity) may be preserved at the selected PEEP level.

The global inhomogeneity index [2] can be independently combined with any region-of-interest-definition method, if appropriate. Given that no perfect method exists currently for identification of collapsed lung areas by electrical impedance tomography, our approach [5] guarantees to include as much of the collapsed lung regions as is detectable in the analysis of ventilation inhomogeneity and provides satisfactory results, as shown in a preliminary study by comparison with computed tomography.

The titration of PEEP actually requires a multidimensional approach. A single ideal PEEP level, satisfying all clinical objectives and situations, may even not exist. A weighted combination of lung mechanics, blood gas analysis and imaging techniques to titrate PEEP therefore seems appealing and promising.

Abbreviations

PEEP: 

positive end-expiratory pressure.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Furtwangen University
(2)
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Section for Experimental Anesthesiology, University Medical Center
(3)
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine,Campus Kiel, University Medical Center of Schleswig-Holstein

References

  1. Costa EL, Amato MB: Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good? Crit Care 2010, 14: 134. 10.1186/cc8901PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhao Z, Steinmann D, Frerichs I, Guttmann J, Moller K: PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography. Crit Care 2010, 14: R8. 10.1186/cc8860PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Glenny R: Counterpoint: Gravity is not the major factor determining the distribution of blood flow in the healthy human lung. J Appl Physiol 2008, 104: 1533-1535. discussion 1535-1536 10.1152/japplphysiol.01092.2007aView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhao Z, Kiefer N, Kulcsar M, Lang S, Möller K: Ventilation inhomogeneity in upright and supine position assessed by electrical impedance tomography. In XII Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing. 27-30 May, 2010; Chalkidiki, Greece. Edited by: Bamidis PD, Konstantindis ST, Bliznakova K and Pallikarakis N. Springer; 2010:84. ISBN 978-960-99365-0-7Google Scholar
  5. Zhao Z, Steinmann D, Müller-Zivkovic D, Martin J, Frerichs I, Guttmann J, Möller K: A lung area estimation method for analysis of ventilation inhomogeneity based on electrical impedance tomography. J Xray Sci Technol 2010, 18: 171-182.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2010

Advertisement