Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Cardiac cycle efficiency: a new index for cardiac work estimation tested during aortic valve plasty

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Critical Care201014 (Suppl 1) :P127

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc8359

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Cardiac Output
  • Cardiovascular System
  • Aortic Valve
  • Stroke Volume
  • Substantial Modification

Introduction

The pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) is the only pulse contour method that does not need any calibration since it estimates in vivo, beat to beat, the impedance of the cardiovascular system [13]. Cardiac cycle efficiency (CCE) is a novel parameter that is directly related to the cardiovascular impedance. Since the aortic valve contributes to impedance, we hypothesized during an aortic valvuloplasty, performed for severe aortic stenosis, the cardiovascular impedance may decrease by the reduction of the transvalvular gradient.

Methods

In a cath lab, five consecutive patients undergoing aortic valve plasty for severe aortic stenosis were monitored by means of PRAM during the procedure. Systolic (SAP), diastolic, and mean (MAP) arterial pressures, stroke volume (SV), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (SV × HR), CCE, and dP/dtmax were continuously collected and afterwards analyzed. The stroke work (SW = SV × MAP) and minute work (MW = SBP × CO) were also measured.

Results

After the ballooning maneuver (valvuloplasty), the maximal gradient measured with intraventricular and intraaortic catheters significantly decreased (146 (37) vs 43 (12) mmHg; P < 0.0001). The CCE significantly improved from -0.72 (0.4) to 0.02 (0.19) U; P < 0.0001. Peripheral dP/dtmax increased from 0.8 (0.27) to 1.16 (0.23) mmHg/ms; P = 0.001, while SW and MW did not show substantial modifications (4.06 (1.03) vs 4.02 (1.4) l × mmHg; NS, and 549.8 (111.5) vs 544.6 (153.4) l × mmHg; NS, respectively)

Conclusions

CCE demonstrated to be a very sensitive estimation of cardiovascular impedance since it shows a significant improvement after the valvuloplasty in spite of unchanged values of both SW and MW. In other words, the energy expenditure of the whole cardiovascular system significantly reduced after the aortic valve stenosis is corrected. Moreover, our data strongly suggest that peripheral dP/dtmax is deeply affected by aortic valve stenosis.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy

References

  1. Romagnoli S, Romano SM: Estimation of hemodynamic parameters by arterial waveform: available technologies. Anesth Analg, in press.Google Scholar
  2. Maus TM, Lee DE: Arterial pressure-based cardiac output assessment. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008, 22: 468-473. 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.03.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Romano SM, Pistolesi M: Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med 2002, 30: 1834-1841. 10.1097/00003246-200208000-00027View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

Advertisement