Skip to main content


  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Predictive value of pulse pressure variation for fluid responsiveness after maneuver to change tidal volume in patients with protective ventilatory strategy

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Critical Care201014 (Suppl 1) :P118

  • Published:


  • Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve
  • Tidal Volume
  • Pulmonary Edema
  • Hydroxyethyl
  • Fluid Responsiveness


After the early phase of sepsis, excessive fluid administration may worsen pulmonary edema and prolong mechanical ventilation [1]. Accurately predicting fluid responsiveness obviates unnecessary fluid loading, and helps to detect patients who may benefit from a volume expansion. Pulse pressure variation (DPP) is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients only when tidal volume is at least 8 ml/kg [2]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of DPP for fluid responsiveness after a maneuver to change tidal volume to 8 ml/kg in patients ventilated with 6 ml/kg.


Prospective clinical study in 40 patients ventilated with 6 ml/kg after resuscitation phase of severe sepsis and septic shock. Fluid challenge was indicated by the attending physician (7 ml/kg of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4). Complete hemodynamic measurements including DPP (DPP 6 ml/kg) were obtained at baseline. The tidal volume was then changed to 8 ml/kg and the DPP (DPP 8 ml/kg) was measured after 5 minutes. The ventilatory settings were returned to 6 ml/kg before fluid challenge. Patients whose cardiac output (CO) increased by ≥15% were considered to be fluid responders. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of DPP.


In 19 patients (responders), CO increased by >15% after fluid infusion. Fluid responsiveness was better predicted with DPP 6 ml/kg (ROC curve area 0.92 ± 0.05) than with pulmonary artery occluded pressure (0.56 ± 0.09) and right atrial pressures (0.74 ± 0.08). Increasing tidal volume to 8 ml/kg did not improved prediction as the ROC curve area with DPP 8 ml/kg was 0.94 ± 0.03. The best cut-off values defined by the ROC curve analysis was 6.5% and 10.5% for DPP 6 ml/kg and DPP 8 ml/kg, respectively.


The maneuver to change tidal volume to 8 ml/kg in patients ventilated with protective ventilatory strategy to better predict fluid responsiveness is not useful. Fluid responsiveness can be correctly predicted in patients ventilated with tidal volume of 6 ml/kg.

Authors’ Affiliations

Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil


  1. Wiedemann HP, et al: N Engl J Med. 2006, 354: 2564-2575. 10.1056/NEJMoa062200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. De Backer D, et al: Intensive Care Med. 2005, 31: 517-523. 10.1007/s00134-005-2586-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© BioMed Central Ltd. 2010