Skip to main content

Advertisement

Calibration of pulse contour continuous cardiac output analysis

Introduction

We evaluated the effect of the calibration interval on the reliability of pulse contour cardiac output (COpc) measurement [1].

Methods

Eleven patients were investigated for over 10 hours using two COpc monitors simultaneously. One COpc (COpcCAL) monitor was calibrated hourly, while the other (COpcNOCAL) was calibrated once initially without any further calibration. COpcCAL was compared with COpcNOCAL.

Results

A total of 116 pairs of cardiac output measurement was obtained. After 3 hours, the correlation between COpcCAL and COpcNOCAL was r2 = 0.85, P < 0.0001, bias ± SD was -0.43 ± 0.87 ml/minute; after 6 hours, r2 = 0.68, P = 0.0064, bias ± SD was -0.83 ± 1.39 ml/minute; after 10 hours, r2 = 0.70, P = 0.0026, bias ± SD was -0.81 ± 1.21 ml/minute. See Figures 1 and 2.

Figure 1
figure1

Line regression between COpcCAL and COpcNOCAL.

Figure 2
figure2

Bland–Altman plot of COpcCAL and COpcNOCAL. Solid line, bias; dashed lines, ± 2 SD.

Conclusion

The calibration interval has no effect on the reliability of the COpc measurement.

References

  1. 1.

    Gödje O, et al.: Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002, 30: 52-58. 10.1097/00003246-200201000-00008

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weng, L., Du, B., Hu, X. et al. Calibration of pulse contour continuous cardiac output analysis. Crit Care 13, P206 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7370

Download citation

Keywords

  • Public Health
  • Cardiac Output
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Output Measurement
  • Output Analysis