Skip to main content

Volume 12 Supplement 5

Sepsis 2008

Automation of Septifast®for molecular diagnosis of infection in septic patients

Background

Time is a critical issue in confirming infection in systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients with suspected sepsis. Early diagnosis, followed by prompt implementation of an appropriate treatment, improves the prognosis of these patients. The SeptiFast® test is a new multiplex PCR test for simultaneous detection of sepsis-relevant microorganisms. It technically consists of three well-defined phases: extraction, detection on the LightCycler 2.0 machine and data analysis. The first one is a manual procedure based on filtration that takes 3.5 to 4 hours. The whole procedure including detection and data analysis takes approximately 6 hours. The aim of our study was to automate the current protocol using MagNa pur® compact and to evaluate the potential advantages of reducing the time to perform the method.

Materials and study design

Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and suspected sepsis. The Ethics Committees from our institution approved the study, and patient or relatives' consent was obtained for blood sampling for PCR. Patient population (ICU): 100 Septifast® determinations and correlative blood cultures and microbiological cultures were performed in 64 patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and high clinical risk factors for bloodstream infection.

Methods

We used a new multiplex PCR-based test, LightCycler® SeptiFast® Test MGRADE (Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg, Germany), including software for simultaneous detection of sepsis-relevant microorganisms directly from blood, according to the manufacturer's recommendations. We followed the standard manufacturer's recommended procedure for extraction and compared it with the procedure using the MagNa pure® compact (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) extraction column based on magnetic nanoparticles. Samples for blood culture analysis were drawn from a fresh venipuncture site according to the common guidelines (DGHM). Blood cultures were analyzed using a semi-automated blood system (BacT/ALERT®; bioMerieux, Marcy-Etoile, France). VITEK II (bioMerieux) was the system used to phenotypically identify pathogens growing from blood cultures and other microbiological tests (stool, urine, respiratory samples, catheter, etc.).

Results

The results were both retrospective and observational. The quality of PCR results versus other laboratory findings and clinical evaluation, using sensitivity and specificity analysis and kappa evaluation to compare the results obtained, was determined. One hundred determinations were studied comparing both methods for extraction. Table 1 presents comparative data for both methods. For sensitivity and specificity analysis, the blood culture data define the disease condition (infection).

Table 1 Comparative values of Septifast® (manual extraction) versus Septifast® (MagNa Pure® compact extraction)

Conclusion

MagNa pure® extraction versus the standard procedure for extraction used in the SeptiFast® test reduces the total test time from 6 to 3 or 3.5 hours. Use of this alternative protocol does not affect the sensitivity or specificity of the method.

References

  1. 1.

    Landis RJ, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977, 33: 159-174. 10.2307/2529310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Regueiro, B., Varela, E., Lamas, L.M. et al. Automation of Septifast®for molecular diagnosis of infection in septic patients. Crit Care 12, P12 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7045

Download citation

Keywords

  • Blood Culture
  • Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
  • Simultaneous Detection
  • Clinical Risk Factor
  • High Clinical Risk