Skip to main content


  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Cardiogenic oscillations reflect nonlinear lung mechanics

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Critical Care200812 (Suppl 2) :P311

  • Published:


  • Inspiratory Flow
  • Lung Mechanic
  • Peep Level
  • High Peep
  • Intermediate Pressure


Heartbeats transfer mechanical energy to the lung, inducing variations in local compliance (dV/dP) [1], which translate to cardiogenic oscillations (COS) in the pressure-volume (PV) loop. We hypothesized that the COS-related local dV/dP change reflects intratidal nonlinear lung mechanics modulated by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).


Ten piglets with atelectasis were investigated during constant inspiratory flow mechanical ventilation with PEEP of 0, 5, 8, 12 and 16 mbar, respectively. The airflow rate, airway pressure and ECG were recorded (sample frequency: 100 Hz). The inspiratory limb of the PV loop was partitioned into segments confined by two consecutive ECG R-peaks and containing one COS. Local compliances were analyzed as the local slope (dV/dp) within consecutive volume windows of 50 ml size.


The COS-related local compliances depend on the PEEP level as shown in one representative animal (Figure 1). They are maximal at PEEP levels of 5 and 8 mbar and are minimal at zero PEEP and at high PEEP levels of 12 and 16 mbar, and they decrease with increasing inspired volume.

Figure 1


COS-related local compliances reflect nonlinear lung mechanics. The information obtained by COS corresponds to what can be learnt from the sigmoid PV loop of a quasistatic manoeuvre with low compliance at low pressure, high compliance at intermediate pressure and again low compliance with overdistension. The intratidal pattern of COS-related compliances possibly reflects the nonlinearity of pulmonary volume distensibility, which, among others, is modulated by PEEP. Analysis of COS-related local compliances may open a window towards lung mechanics determination in spontaneous breathing.

Authors’ Affiliations

University Hospital Freiburg, Germany
Uppsala University, Sweden
Furtwangen University, Furtwangen, Germany


  1. Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, et al: J Appl Physiol. 2004, 96: 879-884. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00532.2003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bijaoui E, et al: Adv Exp Med Biol. 2004, 551: 251-257.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bijaoui E, et al: J Appl Physiol. 2001, 91: 859-865.PubMedGoogle Scholar


© BioMed Central Ltd 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.