Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Surrogate markers of pulmonary edema and severity of lung injury do not accurately reflect measured extravascular lung water

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Critical Care200812 (Suppl 2) :P293

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6514

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Catheter
  • Linear Regression Analysis
  • Lung Injury
  • Clinical Parameter
  • Pulmonary Edema

Introduction

Determination of extravascular lung water (EVLW) by transpulmonary thermodilution predicts progression to acute lung injury (ALI). Early identification of patients at risk for developing ALI may impact clinical decision-making. Measurement of EVLW, however, is invasive, requiring central venous and arterial catheters. We asked whether less invasive clinical parameters and markers of severity of lung injury could be used to estimate lung water, obviating the need for the more invasive determination.

Methods

Eighteen patients at risk for ALI due to massive aspiration (n = 1), sepsis (n = 16), massive transfusion (n = 1), and/or trauma (n = 2) were studied prospectively. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio, central venous pressure (CVP), Vd/Vt, fluid balance, Cs, and Lung Injury Scores (LIS) were compared with the EVLW measured on the same day by linear regression analysis (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Figure 1

(abstract P293)

Results

Poor correlation of EVLW with the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (r2 = 0.0061), CVP (r2 = 0.1261), fluid balance (r2 = 0.0903), Vd/Vt (r2 = 0.0135), Cs (r2 = 0.0014), and LIS (r2 = 0.0837) was seen (Figure 1).

Conclusion

The clinical parameters examined in this study do not accurately reflect the EVLW and should not be used as surrogates for it.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
(2)
Portland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement