Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Factors influencing accuracy of blood glucose measurements in critically ill patients

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Critical Care200812 (Suppl 2) :P163

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6384

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Independent Factor
  • Binary Logistic Regression
  • Prospective Observational Study
  • Reference Laboratory
  • Central Laboratory

Introduction

Rapid and accurate blood glucose measurement is essential for treatment of critically ill patients. This prospective observational study, performed in a nine-bed medical ICU, was designed to evaluate factors affecting the accuracy of different methods of blood glucose measurement.

Methods

A total of 29 consecutively admitted patients were included. Blood glucose was measured with a glucometer (Lifescan surestep™, capillary and arterial), a blood gas analyzer (Radiometer ABL-735, arterial), and a central laboratory (Olympus AU5400, arterial). Each value was compared with the reference laboratory result. Discrepancy was defined as the percentage of paired values not in accordance (>0.83 mmol/l difference for laboratory values <4.12 mmol/l, and >20% difference for values ≥ 4.12 mmol/l). Patient demographics, and clinical data including the presence of peripheral edema, vasopressor dependence, hematocrit, arterial pH and PaO2 were also recorded. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent factor of discrepancy of blood glucose measurements.

Results

Discrepancy occurred in 46% (152/332) of blood glucose measurements. Independent factors of discrepancy are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Independent factors of discrepancy of blood glucose measurements

Factor

OR

95% CI

P value

Hematocrit

0.93

0.89 - 0.98

0.006

PaO2

0.98

0.98 - 0.99

0.003

Assay

   

   Laboratory

1.0

  

   ABG

2.4

1.1 - 4.9

0.021

   Glucometer

7.5

3.6 - 15.6

0.000

Conclusion

Decreased hematocrit, poor oxygenation, and use of glucometer significantly increased the risk of discrepancy of glucose measurements in critically ill patients.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement