- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Reliability of continuous pulse contour cardiac output measurement
Critical Care volume 12, Article number: P98 (2008)
To evaluate the reliability of continuous cardiac output monitoring using pulse-contour analysis in critically ill patients.
We retrospectively analyzed the agreement between transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output (TPCO) and pulse contour cardiac output (PCCO) measured before recalibration of the TPCO from 34 patients with hemodynamic instability. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent factors for the disagreement between TPCO and PCCO, defined as a relative change >15%.
We obtained 261 pairs of measurements. The relative change in systemic vascular resistance calculated with TPCO (ΔSVR-TPCO) of over 20% was the only independent factor for disagreement, while the relative change in systemic vascular resistance calculated with PCCO (ΔSVR-PCCO) and the time interval between calibrations had no predictive value of the reliability of PCCO. See Figure 1.
ΔSVR-TPCO > 20% was associated with unreliability of PCCO measurement. Reliability of PCCO could not be predicted by continuous monitoring parameters, such as ΔSVR-PCCO.
About this article
Cite this article
Weng, L., Xu, H., Hu, X. et al. Reliability of continuous pulse contour cardiac output measurement. Crit Care 12, P98 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6319
- Cardiac Output
- Logistic Regression Analysis
- Independent Factor
- Systemic Vascular Resistance
- Output Measurement