Open Access

Beneficial effects of erythropoietin in preclinical models of shock and organ failure

Critical Care200711:132

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc5912

Published: 29 May 2007

Abstract

Erythropoietin protects many organs against the tissue injury and dysfunction caused by ischaemia/reperfusion and excessive inflammation. This editorial comment discusses the effects of erythropoietin in preclinical models of septic shock, endotoxemia, hemorrhagic shock, spinal cord trauma and zymosan-induced multiple organ failure.

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a 34 kDa glycoprotein hormone that controls the proliferation, differentiation, and survival of erythroid progenitor cells through an antiapoptotic mechanism. It has become apparent that EPO protects many organs, including brain, heart, kidney and liver, against the injury caused by ischaemia/reperfusion, hemorrhagic shock and systemic inflammation. In this issue of Critical Care, Kao and colleagues [1] report their findings in an established murine model of polymicrobial sepsis.

They found that recombinant human EPO (400 IU/kg) exerts significant beneficial effects when it is given as late as 18 hours after caecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Although EPO had no effect on the (small) decline in blood pressure, the decline in platelet and white blood cell counts, or the rise in lactate, it significantly increased tissue perfusion and reduced tissue hypoxia. Within 18 hours after CLP there was a decline in the number of perfused capillary beds (reduced oxygen delivery); this, in turn, resulted in an impairment in mitochondrial electron transport and hence respiration (measured as increase in mitochondrial NADH fluorescence) in skeletal musle (extensor digitorum longus). Most notably, EPO rapidly (within 10 min) reversed both of these effects of CLP, and hence it increased the number of patent capillaries and increased mitochondrial function. Unfortunately, the authors did not measure any parameters of organ injury and dysfunction, and the model of CLP used did not (within 24 hours) result in any deaths. Thus, it remains to be seen whether the improvement in oxygen delivery or mitochondrial function afforded by EPO also results in a significant improvement in outcome.

The study by Kao and coworkers [1] is of particular importance because EPO protects the brain [2], heart [3], kidney [4] and liver [5] against the tissue injury and dysfunction caused by ischaemia/reperfusion (for review [6, 7]). The pathophysiology of the shock associated with trauma/haemorrhage also comprises elements of ischaemia/reperfusion injury (because of hypovolaemia and resuscitation) as well as excessive inflammation. In 2004, we reported that administration of EPO (300 IU/kg intravenously) upon resuscitation reduced the renal dysfunction and liver injury caused by severe haemorrhage and resuscitation in rat [8]. These beneficial effects of EPO were associated with a reduction in tissue (renal) apoptosis secondary to prevention of activation of caspase-3, -8 and -9. Interestingly, EPO also prevents motor neurone apoptosis and associated neurological disability in an experimental model of spinal cord injury [9].

Low doses of EPO (300 IU/kg intravenously) did not affect the organ injury/dysfunction caused by high doses (6 mg/kg) of the Toll-like receptor-4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS) within 6 hours in the rat [8]. However, higher doses of EPO (4,000 IU/kg given 30 min before LPS) attenuated the renal dysfunction (decline in glomerular filtration rate), which occurred at 16 hours after injection of low-dose LPS (2.5 mg/kg intraperitoneally) in mouse [10]. This beneficial effect of EPO in murine endotoxaemia was not due to effects of EPO on either renal blood flow or apoptosis, but it was associated with prevention by EPO of a fall in renal tissue superoxide dismutase activity associated with endotoxaemia. Thus, Mitra and coworkers [10] concluded that the observed beneficial effects of EPO in murine endotoxaemia are secondary to both antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of EPO, which have been reported in other models of disease [11]. Thus, the beneficial effects of EPO in rodent models of endotoxaemia may vary with doses of EPO and LPS, as well as species (rat or mouse) used. Interestingly, higher doses of EPO reduce both the systemic inflammation and the organ injury caused by the Toll-like receptor-2 agonist zymosan in mouse [12]. Specifically, treatment of mice with EPO (1,000 IU/kg subcutaneously, 1 and 6 hours after zymosan) attenuated the signs of local (peritoneal exudation) and systemic (lung inflammation), as well as organ (lung, liver and pancreas) injury and dysfunction (kidney) caused by zymosan. Most notably, EPO reduced the high mortality (70%) caused by zymosan over the observation period of 7 days [12].

The reported beneficial effects of EPO in preclinical models of shock, trauma and haemorrhage are exciting, but further studies are warranted to determine the effects of EPO on outcome (organ injury/dysfunction and survival) in models of CLP. Interestingly, in 86 patients admitted to a long-term acute care facility, administration of weekly recombinant human EPO (n = 42) resulted in a significant reduction in exposure to allogeneic red blood cell transfusion and higher haemoglobin levels than placebo (n = 44) during the initial 42 days of EPO therapy [13]. Although not significant, the mortality rates in patients treated with EPO (12%) were lower than in the patients treated with placebo (23%).

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre Lead for Translational Medicine & Therapeutics, The William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary – University of London, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry

References

  1. Kao R, Xenocostas A, Rui T, Yu P, Huang W, Rose J, Martin CM: Erythropoietin improves skeletal muscle microcirculation and tissue bioenergetics in a mouse sepsis model. Crit Care 2007, 11: R58. 10.1186/cc5920PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sakanaka M, Wen TC, Matsuda S, Masuda S, Morishita E, Nagao M, Sasaki R: In vivo evidence that erythropoietin protects neurons from ischemic damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95: 4635-4640. 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4635PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Parsa CJ, Matsumoto A, Kim J, Riel RU, Pascal LS, Walton GB, Thompson RB, Petrofski JA, Annex BH, Stamler JS, et al.: A novel protective effect of erythropoietin in the infarcted heart. J Clin Invest 2003, 112: 999-1007. 10.1172/JCI200318200PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sharples EJ, Patel N, Brown P, Stewart K, Mota-Philipe H, Sheaff M, Kieswich J, Allen D, Harwood S, Raftery M, et al.: Erythropoietin protects the kidney against the injury and dysfunction caused by ischemia-reperfusion. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004, 15: 2115-2124. 10.1097/01.ASN.0000135059.67385.5DView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sepodes B, Maio R, Pinto R, Sharples E, Oliveira P, McDonald M, Yaqoob M, Thiemermann C, Mota-Filipe H: Recombinant human erythropoietin protects the liver from hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat. Transpl Int 2006, 19: 919-926. 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00366.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sharples EJ, Thiemermann C, Yaqoob MM: Mechanisms of disease: cell death in acute renal failure and emerging evidence for a protective role of erythropoietin. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 2005, 1: 87-97. 10.1038/ncpneph0042View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brines M, Cerami A: Discovering erythropoietin's extra-hematopoietic functions: biology and clinical promise. Kidney Int 2006, 70: 246-250. 10.1038/sj.ki.5001546View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Abdelrahman M, Sharples EJ, McDonald MC, Collin M, Patel NS, Yaqoob MM, Thiemermann C: Erythropoietin attenuates the tissue injury associated with hemorrhagic shock and myocardial ischemia. Shock 2004, 22: 63-69. 10.1097/01.shk.00001276869.21260.9dView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Celik M, Gokmen N, Erbayraktar S, Akhisaroglu M, Konakc S, Ulukus C, Genc S, Genc K, Sagiroglu E, Cerami A, et al.: Erythropoietin prevents motor neuron apoptosis and neurologic disability in experimental spinal cord ischemic injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99: 2258-2263. 10.1073/pnas.042693799PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mitra A, Bansal S, Wang W, Falk S, Zolty E, Schrier RW: Erythropoietin ameliorates renal dysfunction during endotoxaemia. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007, in press.Google Scholar
  11. Cuzzocrea S, Mazzon E, Di Paola R, Patel NS, Genovese T, Muia C, De Sarro A, Thiemermann C: Erythropoietin reduces the development of experimental inflammatory bowel disease. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2004, 311: 1272-1280. 10.1124/jpet.104.073197View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuzzocrea S, Di Paola R, Mazzon E, Patel NS, Genovese T, Muia C, Crisafulli C, Caputi AP, Thiemermann C: Erythropoietin reduces the development of nonseptic shock induced by zymosan in mice. Crit Care Med 2006, 34: 1168-1177. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000207346.56477.E8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Silver M, Corwin MJ, Bazan A, Gettinger A, Enny C, Corwin HL: Efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin in critically ill patients admitted to a long-term acute care facility: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2006, 34: 2310-2316. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000233873.17954.42View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2007

Advertisement