- Poster presentation
- Open Access
A comparison between ultrasound-guided central venous line placement and an anatomical landmark technique
Critical Care volume 11, Article number: P160 (2007)
Ultrasound has been introduced in the insertion of central venous lines to reduce the complications associated with the conventional landmark technique . We compared both techniques; we noted the number of attempts, the duration of insertion and complications.
Thirty patients were randomly selected, from the operating theatre and ICU, who required placement of a central venous catheter. The central venous catheter placement was performed by two experienced anaesthetists with more than 6 years experience in anaesthesia and intensive care. In 15 patients the internal jugular venous catheter placement was performed using the external anatomical landmark technique, and in the other 15 patients the placement was under ultrasound guidance. The duration of insertion was recorded from the moment the needle touched the skin until insertion of the catheter and removal of the guide wire. The numbers of attempts as well as immediate or delayed complications were recorded.
The central venous catheter placement was successfully performed from the first attempt in both groups. There were no immediate or delayed complications noted; however, the mean time of insertion was longer in the ultrasound-guided group (4.55 min) compared with the external anatomical landmark group (2 min) (Figure 1).
Some studies have been designed to evaluate ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement compared with the conventional method based on external anatomical landmarks. These studies demonstrated the superiority of ultrasound-guided central venous line placement over the external anatomical landmark technique. However, there was no time gain demonstrated in ultrasound-guided placement . On the other hand, a number of studies have expressed several reservations concerning the systematic use of ultrasound guidance for central line placement . In our patients we found that the use of ultrasound neither altered the rate of complication nor the number of attempts in central venous catheter placement. Also the duration of placement of the central line catheter using the external anatomical landmark technique was shorter than in the ultrasound-guided method.
The external anatomical landmark technique in central line placement is considered a safe method with experienced hands. The time of insertion of a central line using the external anatomical landmark technique was shorter than the ultrasound-guided placement method. It is essential for all trainees to be taught both methods for central line placement to be able to place a central line catheter quickly and safely in emergency situations and when an ultrasound machine is not available.
Denys BG, Uretsky BF, Reddy PS: Ultrasound-assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective comparison to the external landmark-guided technique. Circulation 1993, 87: 1557-1562.
Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG: Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med 1996, 24: 2053-2058. 10.1097/00003246-199612000-00020
Martin MJ, Hussain , Piesman M, et al.: Is routine ultrasound guidance for central line placement beneficial? A prospective analysis. Curr Surg 2004, 61: 71-74. 10.1016/j.cursur.2003.07.010
About this article
Cite this article
Soliman, M., Ismail, K. A comparison between ultrasound-guided central venous line placement and an anatomical landmark technique. Crit Care 11, P160 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc5320
- Ultrasound Guidance
- Central Venous Line
- Line Placement
- Experienced Anaesthetist
- Central Venous Catheter Placement