Open Access

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with severe sepsis and a high risk of death

  • Jan O Friedrich1Email author,
  • Neill KJ Adhikari2 and
  • Maureen O Meade3
Critical Care200610:427

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc5117

Published: 20 December 2006

We are pleased that Williams and coworkers [1] confirmed our random effects analysis [2], which relied on publicly available data. This analysis pooled the results from patients with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores of 25 or greater from the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation of Severe Sepsis) [3] and ADDRESS (Administration of Drotrecogin Alfa [Activated] in Early Stage Severe Sepsis) [4] trials. As we discussed previously [5], this analysis demonstrates a surprising degree of statistical heterogeneity, which remains despite minimal methodologic differences between the two trials and further minimization of clinical heterogeneity by selecting a more uniform subgroup of patients with severe sepsis and a high risk for death. This heterogeneity is illustrated in Figure 1 presented by Williams and coworkers [1], in which I2 (the percentage of total variation in results across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance [6]), is more than 80% for each of the methods presented. Given this degree of unexplained heterogeneity, the use of a fixed effects model, as suggested by Williams and coworkers [1], would be highly unconventional [7].

We also support the pooling of individual patient data from these trials to generate hypotheses regarding appropriate patient selection for drotrecogin alfa (activated) that could be tested in subsequent trials [5]. Furthermore, we encourage public release of these data for the purposes of a meta-analysis of individual patient data to be undertaken by an independent group, using appropriate statistical methods that incorporate random effects, and that is subject to peer review.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Critical Care and Medicine Departments, St. Michael's Hospital, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto
(2)
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto
(3)
Departments of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology & Department of Critical Care, Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences

References

  1. Williams MD, Janes JM, Nelson DR: Drotrecogin alfa (activated): current evidence supports treatment for severe sepsis patients with a high risk of death. Crit Care 2006, 10: 424. 10.1186/cc5062PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Friedrich JO, Adhikari NK, Meade MO: Drotrecogin alfa (activated): does current evidence support treatment for any patients with severe sepsis? Crit Care 2006, 10: 145. 10.1186/cc4947PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, LaRosa SP, Dhainaut JF, Lopez-Rodriguez A, Steingrub JS, Garber GE, Helterbrand D, Ely EW, for the Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) Study Group, et al.: Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2001, 344: 699-709. 10.1056/NEJM200103083441001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Abraham E, Laterre PF, Garg R, Levy H, Talwar D, Trzaskoma BL, Francois B, Guy JS, Bruckmann M, Rea-Neto A, for the Administration of Drotrecogin Alfa (Activated) in Early Stage Severe Sepsis (ADDRESS) Study Group, et al.: Drotrecogin alfa (activated) for adults with severe sepsis and a low risk of death. N Engl J Med 2005, 353: 1332-1341. 10.1056/NEJMoa050935View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Friedrich JO, Adhikari NKJ, Meade MO: Drotrecogin alfa (activated): down and not out, but not really in either. Crit Care 2006, 10: 420. 10.1186/cc5022PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG: Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003, 327: 557-560. 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG, (editors): Systematic Reviews in Healthcare: Meta-Analysis in Context. London, UK: BMJ Books; 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2006

Advertisement