Decreases in procalcitonin and C-reactive protein are strong predictors of survival in ventilator-associated pneumonia

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is defined as pneumonia occurring more than 48 hours after endotracheal intubation and the initiation of mechanical ventilation. When a clinical diagnosis of VAP is suggested by a new or progressive pulmonary infiltrate associated with fever, an increased white blood cell count and purulent tracheobronchial secretion [1, 2], efforts directed towards the achievement of a microbial diagnosis of VAP by invasive or non-invasive techniques are justified [3].

The mortality rate for VAP ranges from 24% to 50% and can reach 76% in some specific settings or when lung infection is caused by high-risk pathogens [4]. A body of evidence shows that inadequate antimicrobial treatment is an important determinant of mortality [5–8]. Adequacy of antimicrobial therapy is usually assessed on the third day of treatment, on the basis of clinical parameters and microbiological identification.

Markers of the inflammatory response and their kinetics have been studied in the prediction of outcomes in sepsis [9, 10] and VAP [11]. In particular, procalcitonin (PCT) has been evaluated as a marker of sepsis and infection. Severe generalized bacterial infections with systemic manifestations are associated with increased serum levels of PCT. In contrast, viral infections, localized bacterial infections, or inflammatory reactions of non-infectious origin do not, or only moderately, increase PCT levels [12, 13]. Some studies describe PCT as a predictor of severity in sepsis, antimicrobial efficiency and hospital mortality [14–17]. Differential diagnosis and antibiotic treatment as well can be improved by using this marker [18, 19].

Considering the variability of PCT levels, it is possible to theorize that increasing levels, more than a high livel at onset, may indicate persistent infection activity, whereas decreasing values suggest resolution. We undertook a study to assess the prognostic value of the kinetics of PCT, C-reactive protein (CRP), and the clinical scores clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) [20], Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) [21], and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II [22], in the outcome of VAP at an early time point, when adequacy of antimicrobial treatment is evaluated.

The study was conducted in the clinical/surgical 26-bed intensive care unit (ICU) of the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), a tertiary-care–teaching institution with 744 hospital beds.

All patients consecutively admitted to the ICU suspected of VAP were eligible for this prospective observational cohort study. Patients at least 18 years old were recruited. Exclusion criteria were a previous diagnosis of AIDS or neutropenia below 500 cells/ml. Pneumonia was considered ventilator-associated when it occurred after 48 hours of mechanical ventilation and was judged to not have been incubating before starting mechanical ventilation. VAP was considered early-onset when it occurred during the first four days of mechanical ventilation and late-onset when it developed five or more days after the initiation of mechanical ventilation [23]. APACHE II was calculated during the first 24 hours of admission to ICU. Patients were considered immunosuppressed when they had received chemotherapy within the preceding 45 days, or had neutropenia of less than 1,000/mm³.

Diagnosis of pneumonia was suspected when a patient developed a new and persistent radiographic infiltrate plus two of the following: (1) body temperature more than 38°C or less than 36°C; (2) white blood cells more than 11,000 or less than 4,000/mm³ (3) macroscopically purulent tracheal aspirate [24]. Purulent endotracheal aspirate was defined on inspection by the assistant team. The axillary temperature used was the highest in the previous 24 hours before the inclusion on the study.

Chest X-ray, arterial blood gases, complete blood count, creatinine, total bilirubin, albumin, PCT and CRP were obtained by the that time VAP was suspected (D0) and repeated on the fourth day of treatment (D4). Quantitative endotracheal aspirate (QEA) was obtained on D0, repeated on the third day after the diagnosis (D3) and then weekly. Sterile endotracheal aspirates were obtained with a suction catheter adapted to a mucus collector without saline instillation, and two samples of hemocultures were collected from different veins with a 15-minute interval before starting antimicrobial treatment.

CPIS [25], modified as described by Singh and colleagues [20], was calculated on the basis of data on D0 and D3. Patients were assumed to have VAP when the CPIS was 7 points or more. CPIS was calculated with data from D0, adding points for microbiological results and progression of pulmonary infiltrate on a new chest X-ray on D3. To calculate CPIS on D3, data from D3 were used to study the kinetics of the modified CPIS.

For a diagnosis of VAP, there should be no evidence of another medical condition to which the presenting symptoms, signs or radiological findings could be attributed. A SOFA score was calculated on D0 and D4. QEA was considered positive when values were at least 10⁵ colony-forming units/ml.

All patients with a clinical suspicion of VAP, later confirmed by a CPIS of at least 7 and fulfilling inclusion criteria, were included and received empirical antimicrobial therapy on D0. The choice of antibiotics and changes rested solely with the critical care team or primary service caring for the patient. Modifications to empirical therapy were based on the results of QEA and hemocultures. Mechanical ventilation, physiotherapy and airway management were performed in accordance with a standard protocol in all patients.

Patients' progress was followed until the 28th day (D28) after the diagnosis of VAP, when they were considered survivors. Patients who died before D28 were non-survivors. Patients discharged from the ICU before D28 were also considered survivors. All patients with VAP were reviewed by one of the investigators to confirm the diagnosis on the basis of predetermined criteria.

Seventy-five patients were enrolled from October 2003 to August 2005 and constituted the study population. The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Human Research Committee from the HCPA, and informed written consent was obtained from patients' representatives before enrollment. The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Trained investigators collected data on D0, D3, D4, and weekly until D28. Recorded data included age, sex, cause of ICU admission, arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO₂/FiO₂), APACHE II score, SOFA score, CPIS, co-morbidities including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, whether active smoker, history of congestive heart failure, history of malignancy, immunosuppression, albumin, use of histamine type-2 receptor (H2) antagonist, use of proton pump inhibitor, use of corticosteroids, dialysis, central vein catheterization, urinary tract catheterization, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of stay in ICU before VAP, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intubation (orotracheal versus nasotracheal), and tracheotomy.

Adequacy of the empirical antimicrobial treatment was recorded on the basis of microbiological results. Adequate antibiotic therapy was defined as coverage of all the pathogens isolated (from QEA culture or from blood), by at least one antimicrobial administered by the onset of VAP, determined by the sensitivity pattern in the antibiogram [26]. Treatment was considered adequate when cultures were negative.

PCT was determined with the commercially available immunoluminometric assay (Brahms PCT LIA; Brahms Diagnostika, Berlin, Germany) with an analytical sensitivity of 0.1 ng/ml and analyzed with a Lumat LB 9507 Luminometer (Berthold, Bad Wildbad, Germany). Blood was drawn when a diagnosis of VAP was clinically suspected, before empirical antibiotic treatment was started. Samples of serum were prepared and frozen immediately after blood was drawn, then stored at -80°C in the HCPA research laboratory. Assays were performed in batches at the end of the study period.

CRP was measured by nephelometry (Bade Behring, Marburg, Germany), routinely determined at the HCPA laboratory.

Kinetic data on PCT and CRP from D0 to D4 are shown in Figure 1. PCT levels were lower in survivors on D0 (p = 0.003) and on D4 (p = 0.001). PCT levels increased in non-survivors but not in survivors (Table 3). Decreasing ΔPCT was not related to adequacy of antibiotic treatment on the basis of QEA results on D0 (p = 0.76). CRP levels showed no difference between survivors and non-survivors on D0 (p = 0.77) and on D4 (p = 0.14). Decreasing ΔCRP was not related to adequacy of antibiotic treatment based on QEA results on D0 (p = 0.13). CPIS did not discriminate survivors from non-survivors on D0 (p = 0.32) or on D3 (p = 0.45). Decreasing ΔCPIS was not related to survival (p = 0.59); neither was CPIS < 6 on D3 (p = 0.79). Decreasing ΔCPIS and CPIS < 6 on D3 were not related to adequacy of antibiotic treatment (p = 1.00 and p = 0.55, respectively). Patients who died before D4 could not have kinetics determined and are classed as missing cases. Fifteen patients were not included in the kinetics analysis. Eight patients died and one patient left the ICU before D4. Data on six patients were missing as a consequence of a logistic flaw. The evolution of clinical scores and laboratory parameters are presented in Table 3.

The multivariable logistic regression model for survival included the variables from the univariable analysis. Only decreasing ΔPCT with OR = 4.43 (1.08 to 18.18), p = 0.04, and decreasing ΔCRP with OR = 7.40 (1.58 to 34.73), p = 0.01, remained significant (Table 4).

None of the patients included in the study achieved immunosuppression criteria. Only 17.3% of patients received corticosteroids, without statistical significance between survivors and non-survivors (p = 0.23) and corticosteroid dosage between groups (p = 0.25).

Our results showed that, on D0 and D4, PCT levels and SOFA score differentiated survivors from non-survivors. Decreasing values of CRP and decreasing values of PCT were able to predict, respectively, a sevenfold and fourfold greater chance for patients with VAP to survive.

CRP is used as a parameter to support the diagnosis of infection [9]. Yentis and colleagues [10] demonstrated that a decrease in CRP by 25% or more from the previous day's level was a good indicator of resolution of sepsis, with a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 95% and a predictive value of 97%. The decrease in CRP preceded clinical resolution of sepsis and was more likely to occur in patients with less severe sepsis than in those with severe sepsis or septic shock [10]. In our results, absolute CRP levels could not differentiate survivors from non-survivors on D0 and D4 (p = 0.77 and 0.14, respectively). Nevertheless, similarly to the results of Yentis and colleagues in patients with sepsis, in our VAP patients the decrease of CRP levels was significantly predictive of survival, with OR = 7.40.

We assessed the correlation of CPIS changes from D0 to D3 with survival. The kinetics of CPIS from D0 to D3 was chosen to compare with published data. Luna and colleagues [26] studied 63 patients with clinical evidence of VAP and bacteriologic confirmation by bronchoalveolar lavage or blood cultures. In their sample, CPIS fell progressively in the population as a whole, and the decrease in CPIS was significant in survivors but not in non-survivors. When CPIS was less than 6 at 3 or 5 days after VAP onset, mortality was lower than in the remaining patients. They considered these differences to be related to the finding that patients receiving adequate therapy had a slight fall in CPIS, whereas those receiving inadequate therapy did not. However, their mortality rate was not statistically significant: 69.2% for patients treated with inadequate antibiotic treatment and 46.0% for patients on adequate antibiotic treatment (p = 0.238). Their mortality rate in all patients was 50.8%. Those results are in partial contrast with ours. In our sample, serial measurements of modified CPIS on D0 and D3 could not differentiate between survivors and non-survivors (p = 0.44 for D0; p = 0.43 for D3). We could not correlate decreasing ΔCPIS with survival (p = 0.79); CPIS < 6 on D3 was also not correlated with survival (p = 0.59).

We assessed the possible correlation of changes in CPIS from D0 to D3 with adequacy of antibiotic treatment on the basis of microbiological results of QEA on D0. We could not correlate decreasing ΔCPIS with adequacy of antibiotic treatment (p = 1.00) and CPIS < 6 on D3 with adequacy of treatment (p = 0.55). Neither decreasing ΔPCT and ΔCRP was related to adequacy of antibiotic treatment on the basis of QEA results on D0 in our sample. We also could not correlate survival with adequacy of antibiotic treatment: 50.0% of the 20 patients treated with inadequate antibiotics survived, and 65.5% of the 55 patients on adequate antibiotics survived (p = 0.29). There was a trend to correlate adequacy with survival, but the lack of statistical significance may represent a type 2 error.

Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome is associated with mortality. Vincent and colleagues [21] demonstrated that multiple organ dysfunction and high SOFA scores for any individual organ were associated with increased mortality. In their sample, the SOFA score increased in 44% of the non-survivors but in only 20% of the survivors (p < 0.001) in patients who stayed at least 1 week in the ICU. Our results with SOFA score were similar to those: the SOFA score was higher in non-survivors on D0 (p = 0.002) and D4 (p = 0.002; Table 3) and decreasing SOFA scores were predictive of survival, with OR = 3.08 (p = 0.05) in the univariable, but not in the multivariable, logistic regression (p = 0.54).

In our results, PCT levels were significantly higher in non-survivors on D0 (p = 0.003) and D4 (p = <0.001). Furthermore, the decrease in PCT levels was significantly predictive of survival, with OR = 4.43. Other studies on patients with VAP have reported higher PCT levels in non-survivors than in survivors [28, 29]. In a study with children with severe bacterial infection, Assicot and colleagues [12] reported that serum PCT values decreased rapidly during antibiotic therapy.

We analyzed the influence of septic status on the kinetics of PCT, CRP and SOFA. Increasing ΔPCT was more frequent in patients with septic shock than in septic and severely septic patients. There was a trend of more frequent decreasing ΔPCT sepsis and severe sepsis, but these results were not statistically significant (p = 0.12) and may be attributed to sample size. There was no difference in the performance of ΔCRP and ΔSOFA in all three statuses (p = 0.96 and p = 0.97, respectively) in our sample.

Although high PCT levels at the onset of sepsis have been reported to be associated with lethal outcome [30], this observation was not corroborated by Meisner and colleagues [14]. They compared PCT and CRP at different SOFA scores during the course of sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Measurement of PCT during multiple organ dysfunction syndrome provided more information about the severity and the course of disease than that of CRP. Higher SOFA scores were associated with significantly higher plasma PCT concentrations, whereas CRP was elevated irrespective of the scores observed. In a similar manner to our results, they found an increase in PCT levels after day 4 in non-survivors (p < 0.01). In that study, a rapid decline of PCT levels in patients who recovered and survived was also observed, whereas CRP increased for several days even after recovery and discharge of the patient from the ICU.

Changes in biological markers levels may indicate a modification in clinical status. In a recent study, Luyt and colleagues [11] assessed the value of PCT kinetics as a prognostic marker during VAP in 63 patients, with measures on days 1, 3 and 7. Unfavorable outcomes were death, recurrence of VAP, or occurrence of extrapulmonary infection requiring antibiotic treatment during the first 28 days of VAP. PCT levels in the sample generally decreased from D1 to D7 but increased in patients with unfavorable outcome. For PCT analysis, the study by Luyt and colleagues used the time-resolved amplified cryptate emission technology, an expensive apparatus not available worldwide. We analyzed PCT with a luminometry assay, which is less expensive and commercially available. This strategy has the inconvenience of being less sensitive than the research technology, but it may offer a cost-effective option. Our study design also had some distinctions: our main outcome was survival and we assessed change in PCT over four days, which may be clinically more relevant because this is the time frame during which VAP treatment is frequently reassessed [31].

Considering the mortality rate of VAP, it is highly desirable to have early laboratory markers to predict survival or the necessity to reassess initial empirical antimicrobial therapy. In our sample, decreasing ΔSOFA, ΔPCT and ΔCRP were significantly predictive of survival in univariable analysis, but the multivariable regression model maintained only ΔPCT and ΔCRP as independent predictors for survival, as early as in D4. Patients may express different serum levels of markers when exposed to bacterial toxins, and this stimulation may be multifactorial. The advantage of kinetics was that, independently of an absolute value, decreasing values were related to survival; this outcome is suggestive of a decrease in stimulus to inflammation and a decrease in exposure to bacterial toxins.

Measurement of PCT and CRP at onset and the fourth day of treatment can predict the survival of patients with VAP. A decrease in either of these marker values predicts survival. The identification of those with good outcome as early as on day four could possibly help to ensure the adequacy of antimicrobial therapy. Further studies with a larger sample are necessary to establish whether a combination of marker kinetics can be used to guide antimicrobial therapy, especially in cases in which microorganisms are not identified.