Open Access

Bench-to-bedside review: Paediatric viral lower respiratory tract disease necessitating mechanical ventilation – should we use exogenous surfactant?

Critical Care20059:550

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3823

Published: 5 October 2005

Abstract

Treatment of infants with viral lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) necessitating mechanical ventilation is mainly symptomatic. The therapeutic use of surfactant seems rational because significantly lower levels of surfactant phospholipids and proteins, and impaired capacity to reduce surface tension were observed among infants and young children with viral LRTD. This article reviews the role of pulmonary surfactant in the pathogenesis of paediatric viral LRTD. Three randomized trials demonstrated improved oxygenation and reduced duration of mechanical ventilation and paediatric intensive care unit stay in young children with viral LRTD after administration of exogenous surfactant. This suggest that exogenous surfactant is the first beneficial treatment for ventilated infants with viral LRTD. Additionally, in vitro and animal studies demonstrated that surfactant associated proteins SP-A and SP-D bind to respiratory viruses, play a role in eliminating these viruses and induce an inflammatory response. Although these immunomodulating effects are promising, the available data are inconclusive and the findings are unconfirmed in humans. In summary, exogenous surfactant in ventilated infants with viral LRTD could be a useful therapeutic approach. Its beneficial role in improving oxygenation has already been established in clinical trials, whereas the immunomodulating effects are promising but remain to be elucidated.

Introduction

Each winter paediatric intensivists are challenged with infants and young children with viral lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) necessitating mechanical ventilation (MV). In the majority of cases the causative agent is respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), although other viruses such as the parainfluenza virus, human metapneumovirus, adenovirus and influenza virus have also been implicated [14]. The number of infants hospitalized with RSV LRTD in the USA annually is currently above 100,000 and still rising [5]. Respiratory failure necessitating MV occurs in 2–16% of previously healthy infants. This percentage may increase to 36% in prematurely born infants or infants with chronic lung disease [6, 7]. The duration of MV may be as long as 10 days [8]. The efficacy of corticosteroids or ribavirin in reducing the duration of ventilation and of stay in the paediatric intensive care unit has not been demonstrated [9].

From a pathophysiological point of view, the use of exogenous surfactant seems rational. It was initially identified as a complex of lipids and proteins found at the air–liquid interface of the lungs, where its main function is to lower the surface tension [1012]. A novel function of surfactant came from the emerging evidence that two surfactant proteins (SPs), namely SP-A and SP-D, are involved in the host immune response to various micro-organisms, including viruses [13]. This novel function gained further interest when it was found that these SPs are also expressed outside the lungs.

The purpose of this article is to review the role of pulmonary surfactant in the pathogenesis of paediatric viral LRTD necessitating MV, and the potential role of exogenous surfactant as a treatment modality. These functions of surfactant are discussed separately.

Composition of pulmonary surfactant

Pulmonary surfactant is a mixture of approximately 90% lipids and 10% proteins, synthesized within type II alveolar cells and secreted in the alveoli through exocytosis [14]. The best known function of surfactant is to lower surface tension at the air–liquid interface in alveoli and conducting airways, but it also enhances the transport of fluid from the alveolar space to the interstitium and improves mucociliary transport [10, 14]. Reduction in surface tension is achieved by the lipid part of surfactant, which is composed of 90% phospholipids and 10% phosphatidylglycerol [11]. Four SPs, designated SP-A, SP-B, SP-C and SP-D, play an important role in surfactant homeostasis and protection against inhibition by plasma proteins or serum [10, 11, 14, 15].

Emerging data demonstrate that SP-A and SP-D also mediate a host defence function [16]. For SP-B and SP-C no data are available on the influence of these proteins on the host immune response. SP-A and SP-D have a calcium-dependent lectin domain (the so-called carbohydrate recognition domain), which is usually the binding site for micro-organisms. SP-A is a octadecamer molecule composed of six trimeric subunits, which is formed like a bouquet of tulips [17]. Its main function is opsonization and phagocytosis of micro-organisms by antigen-presenting cells such as alveolar macrophages. SP-D is composed of four trimeric subunits, and it is a very potent mediator in collectin-mediated viral aggregation with subsequent clearance of virus through uptake by phagocytes [1719]. Both proteins are expressed in alveolar type II cells, although SP-A is not only expressed in Clara cells and cells in tracheobronchial glands but also outside the lungs [15, 19, 20].

Impairment of surface tension reduction in viral lower respiratory tract disease

Observational studies conducted in mechanically ventilated infants with viral LRTD have demonstrated lower concentrations of surfactant lipids in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids or endotracheal aspirates (Table 1). Furthermore, impaired capacity to reduce surface tension has also been reported [2123]. Taking methodological issues into account (such as method and timing of sampling), these studies suggest that shortage of surfactant lipids and impaired surfactant function play roles in the pathophysiology of viral LRTD. However, the actual pathophysiological mechanisms are unclear. Possible mechanisms include decreased production due to viral invasion of type II pneumocytes and altered regulation of the production of surfactant lipids. Furthermore, a protein overload in the alveoli could result in decreased surfactant function even when normal concentrations of surfactant lipids are present. Increased protein concentrations in BAL fluids have been observed in infants with viral LRTD [24]. In animal studies impaired capacity to reduce surface tension occurred when BAL fluid from RSV-infected BALB/c mice was added to calf lung surfactant extract [25]. The function of surfactant, determined using the capillary surfactometer, was impaired with increasing virus titre and correlated negatively with protein concentration in BAL fluid.
Table 1

Surfactant composition and function in mechanically ventilated children with viral (respiratory syncytial virus) lower respiratory tract disease

Reference

Study population (n; index/controls)

RSV+ patients (n)

Specimens

Study item

Index patients

Control patients

[21]

12/8

11/12

ET

SP-A

1.02 (0.35–4.67) μg/ml*

14.4 (5.6–58.7) μg/ml

    

PC

350 (140–540) μg/ml*

1060 (690–4020) μg/ml

    

MST

44 (42.5–45)*

34 (26–37)

[22]

30/35

27/30

ET

SP-A

2.4 ± 2.0 μg/ml*,a

12.8 ± 14.7 μg/ml

    

SP-B

14.0 ± 19.3 μg/mla

19.8 ± 29.8 μg/ml

    

L/S ratio

11.2 ± 5.7*

41.8 ± 62.7

    

PC

82.4 ± 62.1

120.5 ± 73.4

    

Sphingomyelin

9.2 ± 7.9

8.1 ± 8.6

[23]

24/19

18/24

BAL

PG absent

8*

0

    

Surfactant activity present

2*

12

[24]

18/16

18/18

BAL

SP-A

5.6 (0.6–151.9) μg/ml*

9.0 (0.5–139.6) μg/ml

    

SP-B

12.0 (0.0 – 60.8) ng/ml*

118.1 (0.0–778.2) ng/ml

    

SP-D

130.3 (0.0–148.6) ng/ml*

600.4 (0.0–1869.0) ng/ml

Values are expressed as mean (range) or mean ± standard deviation. aExpressed as quantity per total protein amount. BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; ET, endotrachael aspirate; L/S, lecithin/sphyngomyelin; MST, mean surface tension; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; SP, surfactant protein. *P < 0.05.

Restoring surface tension reduction by exogenous surfactant

The observation of lower levels of surfactant phospholipids and impaired capacity to reduce surface tension in infants with viral LRTD has led to the hypothesis that exogenous surfactant might be beneficial in restoring airway patency and improving lung compliance. Three randomized clinical trials were conducted to investigate this hypothesis [2628] (Table 2).
Table 2

Results from trials of the efficacy of exogenous surfactant in mechanically ventilated children with viral lower respiratory tract disease

 

Reference

 

[26]

[27]

[28]

Study population

20 children with bronchiolitis

40 children with bronchiolitis

19 infants with bronchiolitis

% RSV+

20%

100%

100%

Surfactant preparation

Curosurf

Curosurf

Survanta

Dosage

50 mg/kg once

50 mg/kg once

100 mg/kg twice

Time of administration

Unknown

Unknown

t = 0 and t = 24 hours after PICU admission

Inclusion criteria

PaO2/FiO2 ratio <150 PIP >35 cmH2O

PaO2/FiO2 <150 PIP >35 cmH2O

Oxygenation index > 5 Ventilation index > 20

Clinical phenotype

Restrictive

Restrictive

Obstructive

Ventilatory strategy

   

   Mode of ventilation

Volume control

Volume control

Pressure control

   Permissive hypercapnia (pH > 7.25)

No

Yes

Yes

   Permissive hypoxaemia (PaO2 >60 mmHg or SaO2 >88%)

No

Yes

Yes

   Manual ventilation before surfactant administration

Yes

Yes

No

Main outcome findings

   

   Duration of mechanical ventilation

Reduced

Reduced

Tendency toward reductiona

   Duration of PICU stay

Reduced

Reduced

Tendency toward reductiona

   Oxygenation

Increased PaO2/FiO2

Increased PaO2/FiO2

Decreased oxygenation index and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient

aStudy was not powered to detect significant differences. FiO2, fractional inspired oxygen; PaO2, arterial oxygen tension; PICU, paediatric intensive care unit; PIP, positive inspiratory pressure; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; SaO2, arterial oxygen saturation.

Tibby and coworkers [28] randomly assigned 19 infants with RSV-induced respiratory failure and moderate oxygenation impairment (oxygenation index > 5) to receive 100 mg/kg Survanta® (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA; a bovine surfactant preparation that contains phospholipids and SP-B and SP-C) or placebo. Two doses of surfactant were administered, one at enrollment and one 24 hours later. Administration of exogenous surfactant prevented further pulmonary deterioration, as indicated by oxygenation index, alveolo–arterial oxygen gradient and ventilation index. Although the study was not designed to detect differences in duration of mechanical ventilation, surfactant-treated infants were ventilated for significantly shorter periods than were nontreated infants (126 hours versus 170 hours). Interestingly, infants with an obstructive disease pattern were also included. They also appeared to benefit from exogenous surfactant.

Additional evidence came from two randomized trials conducted by Luchetti and coworkers [26, 27]. Children aged 2 months to 2.5 years with virus (RSV)-induced respiratory failure with an arterial oxygen tension/fractional inspired oxygen ratio below 150 mmHg and a positive inspiratory pressure above 35 cmH2O (indicating severe oxygenation disturbances) were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg/kg Curosurf (a porcine surfactant containing phospholipids as well as SP-B and SP-C) (Chiesi, Parma, Italy) once or nothing [26]. Children with an obstructive disease pattern were not included. In both studies a significantly higher arterial oxygen tension/fractional inspired oxygen ratio and lower positive inspiratory pressure was observed 24–48 hours after surfactant administration. More importantly, in both studies a significantly shorter duration of MV was observed among treated children (4.4 ± 0.4 days versus 8.9 ± 1.0 days in the first study [26] and 4.6 ± 0.8 versus 5.8 ± 0.7 days in the second study [27]) and intensive care unit stay (6.4 ± 0.9 days versus 8.2 ± 1.1 days in the control group) was noted.

These three studies suggest a beneficial role for exogenous surfactant in the treatment of viral LRTD when there is a reduced surface tension resulting in a decreased lung compliance with oxygenation disturbances. Compared with corticosteroids or the antiviral compound ribavirin, it seems at present that exogenous surfactant might be the only treatment modality that actually reduces duration of MV and paediatric intensive care unit stay [9]. However, the trials conducted by Luchetti and coworkers [26, 27] have met with some criticism. Volume-controlled ventilation was used as a ventilatory strategy, but this may result in high inspiratory pressures in patients with small airway disease. Furthermore, in the first study by Luchetti and colleagues [26] there was no weaning protocol, large tidal volumes of 10 ml/kg were used and manual inflation before surfactant instillation was done, which itself could have induced beneficial effects.

Do these investigations provide sufficient evidence to justify the use of exogenous surfactant in mechanically ventilated infants with RSV LRTD? The three trials suggest that exogenous surfactant could be beneficial when there is impaired oxygenation, but we feel that the question cannot be answered until a properly designed, randomized controlled trial is undertaken. With respect to the costs associated with surfactant treatment in young children, it was recently demonstrated that exogenous surfactant is cost-effective [29].

Surfactant proteins and the host response against viruses

Various in vitro and animal studies have shown that SP-A and SP-D bind to respiratory viruses such as RSV, influenza virus, cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus type 1 to function as opsonins or to mediate viral aggregation [3037]. Since this binding is usually calcium dependent, the lectin domain is mostly involved. The exact role of SP-A and SP-D in eliminating respiratory viruses is unclear, although there is evidence suggesting a role for both proteins [3032, 38, 39]. Enhanced phagocytosis of RSV by peripheral blood monocytes and U937 macrophages in a dose-dependent manner was seen in vitro, suggesting that SP-A enhances viral uptake by phagocytic cells [40]. Additional evidence was found in SP-A knockout mice, in which increased viral titres of RSV and influenza virus were found [41, 42]. In BALB/c mice pulmonary RSV titres were nearly undetectable when they received recombinant SP-D intranasally 4 hours before inoculation with RSV [36]. The efficacy of viral neutralization may also be mediated by SP-A. In SP-A negative mice decreased killing function of alveolar macrophages and neutrophils was observed [41, 42].

SP-A and SP-D can induce a proinflammatory response to RSV and influenza virus, although in SP-A knockout mice a proinflammatory response has also been noted, and so the precise role played by SP-A and SP-D is unclear [4043]. Recruitment of inflammatory effector cells such as neutrophils appears also to be mediated by SP-A [31, 32]. In contrast, however, increased neutrophil counts have also been found in BAL fluid from SP-A negative mice compared with control mice [41]. Because of this, it can only be concluded that the presently available data on the immunomodulatory function of SP-A and SP-D are conflicting and that further study is warranted.

Surfactant protein deficiencies in childen with viral lower respiratory tract disease

Lower concentrations of SP-A and D have been described in young children with viral LRTD (Table 1) [21, 22, 24]. Possible explanations include decreased production of surfactant proteins due to viral invasion of type II pneumocytes and altered regulation of the production of surfactant proteins by inflammatory mediators. On the other hand, because SP-A and SP-D play a role in the host response to viruses, binding of the SPs with these viruses with subsequent phagocytosis might also explain why low concentrations of SPs are found. Furthermore, as in any other pulmonary inflammatory disease, the alveolar-capillary membrane gets disrupted and proteins could leak into the capillary system. Evidence for this was found in 15 young, previously healthy infants (aged 1–14 months) with acute bronchiolitis due to RSV, in whom increased plasma concentrations of SP-B (4017 ± 852 ng/ml versus 1313 ± 104 ng/ml in the control group), but not of SP-A, were found in comparison with healthy age-matched control infants [44]. However, none of the studied infants required MV, thus representing a less severe disease patient category. A possible explanation for the inability to detect SP-A in plasma may be its size, because SP-A is larger than SP-B, although the actual molecular weight of SP-A depends upon its glycosylation [45]. However, interpretation of SP concentrations in whole blood is also hampered by the fact that these proteins are produced throughout the body, rather than only being produced in the lungs [20].

It is interesting that lower concentrations of SPs have been observed also to result from genetic polymorphisms in the genes that encode these proteins. SP-A is encoded by two genes (SP-A1 and SP-A2), which are located on chromosome 10 [46]. The gene encoding SP-D is also located on chromosome 10, near the locus of SP-A [47]. Human SP-A consists of assembled gene products of either one or both genes. The genes encoding SP-A and SP-D contain several single polymorphic sites that result in amino acid substitution. The haplotypes for the SP-A1 gene have been denoted 6An, whereas for SP-A2 they have been denoted 1An. More than 30 allelic variants have been described and are reviewed elsewhere [17, 48]. Several alleles that differ by a single nucleotide have been characterized for both SP-A1 and SP-A2. Similar to SP-A, allelic variants have been described for SP-D [47]. These polymorphisms in the SP-A and SP-D genes may contribute to disease severity. Löfgren and coworkers [49] found an overexpression of allele 1A3 of the SP-A2 gene and haploptype 6A/1A3 in RSV-infected infants, whereas allele 1A of SP-A2 and allele 6A of SP-A1 were under-represented. In the SP-A2 gene lysine was found significantly more often at amino acid position 223, and proline significantly less at amino acid position 91 compared with controls. For SP-D it was found that a methionine–threonine substitution at position 11 was associated with a more severe RSV infection (i.e. necessitating hospitalization) [50].

Conclusion

Treating mechanically ventilated infants with viral LRTD remains a challenge. The common appreciation of surfactant being a substance that could only reduce surface tension in the lungs has changed because of increasing knowledge of the influence of SPs on host defence. Studies in mechanically ventilated children with viral LRTD have shown lower levels of surfactant phospholipids and impaired capacity to reduce surface tension, indicating a deficient pulmonary surfactant system. These studies have also demonstrated lower concentrations of SP-A and SP-D in these children. Data from in vitro and animal studies show that both proteins bind to respiratory viruses, play a role in the elimination of the viruses and induce an immune response. However, the data are not conclusive and not (yet) confirmed in human studies. Thus, exogenous surfactant in ventilated infants with viral LRTD could be a useful therapeutic approach. Its potential beneficial role in improving oxygenation has been established in clinical trials, although a well designed randomized controlled trial is eagerly awaited. Additionally, the immuno-modulating effects are promising but remain to be elucidated.

Abbreviations

BAL: 

bronchoalveolar lavage

LRTD: 

lower respiratory tract disease

MV: 

mechanical ventilation

RSV: 

respiratory syncytial virus

SP: 

surfactant protein.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, VU University Medical Center
(2)
Department of Pediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital

References

  1. Hall CB: Respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus. N Engl J Med 2001, 344: 1917-1928. 10.1056/NEJM200106213442507View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastien N, Ward D, van Caeselle P, Brandt K, Lee HSS, McNabb G, Klisko B, Chan E, Li Y: Human metapneumovirus infection in the Canadian population. J Clin Microbiol 2003, 41: 4642-4646. 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4642-4646.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Izurieta HS, Thompson WW, Kramarz P, Shay DK, Davis RL, DeStefano F, Black S, Shinefield H, Fukuda K: Influenza and the rates of hospitalization for respiratory disease among infants and young children. N Engl J Med 2000, 342: 232-239. 10.1056/NEJM200001273420402View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Williams JV, Harris PA, Tollefson FJ, Halburnt-Rush LL, Pingersterhaus JM, Edwards KM, Wright PF, Crowe JE Jr: Human metapneumovirus and lower respiratory tract disease in otherwise healthy infants and children. N Engl J Med 2004, 350: 443-450. 10.1056/NEJMoa025472PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Karr C: Bronchiolitis poses significant public health burden. Pediatr Ann 2004, 33: 454-459.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Shay DK, Holman RC, Newman RD, Liu LL, Stout JW, Anderson LJ: Bronchiolitis-associated hospitalisations among US children, 1980–1996. JAMA 1999, 282: 1440-1446. 10.1001/jama.282.15.1440View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang EE, Law BJ, Boucher FD, Stephens D, Robinson JL, Dobson S, Langley JM, McDonald J, MacDonald NE, Mitchell I: Pediatric Investigators Collaborative Network on Infections in Canada (PICNIC) study of admission and management variation in patients hospitalised with respiratory syncytial viral lower respiratory tract infection. J Pediatr 1996, 129: 390-395.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Guerguian A-M, Farrell C, Gauthier M, Lacroix J: Bronchiolitis: what's next? Pediatr Crit Care Med 2004, 5: 498-500. 10.1097/01.PCC.0000130991.23217.88View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Davison C, Ventre KM, Luchetti M, Randolph AG: Efficacy of interventions for bronchiolitis in critically ill infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2004, 5: 482-489. 10.1097/01.PCC.0000128891.54799.67PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Meyer K, Zimmerman J: Inflammation and surfactant. Paediatr Respir Rev 2002, 3: 308-314. 10.1016/S1043-6618(02)00212-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mallory G Jr: Surfactant proteins: role in lung physiology and disease in early life. Paediatr Respir Rev 2001, 2: 151-158. 10.1053/prrv.2000.0123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis JF, Brackenbury B: Role of exogenous surfactant in acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 2003, 31: S324-S328. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000057911.19145.9FView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark HW, Reid KBM, Sim RB: Collectins and innate immunity in the lung. Microbes Infect 2000, 2: 273-278. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)00301-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis J, Veldhuizen R: The role of exogenous surfactant in the treatment of acute lung injury. Annu Rev Physiol 2003, 65: 613-642. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.65.092101.142434View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. LeVine AM, Whitsett JA: Pulmonary collectins and innate host defense of the lung. Microbes Infect 2001, 3: 161-166. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01363-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wright JR: Immunoregulatory functions of surfactant proteins. Nature Rev 2005, 5: 58-68. 10.1038/nri1528Google Scholar
  17. Haagsman HP: Structural and functional aspects of the collectin SP-A. Immunobiol 2002, 205: 476-489. 10.1078/0171-2985-00148View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Crouch EC: Collectins and pulmonary host defense. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1998, 19: 177-201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Crouch EC: Surfactant protein-D and pulmonary host defense. Respir Res 2000, 1: 93-108. 10.1186/rr19PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bourbon JR, Chailley-Heu B: Surfactant proteins in the digestive tract, mesentery, and other organs: evolutionary significance. Comp Biochem Physiol 2001, 129: 151-161.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Dargaville PA, South M, McDougall PN: Surfactant abnormalities in infants with severe viral bronchiolitis. Arch Dis Child 1996, 75: 133-136.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. LeVine AM, Lotze A, Stanley S, Stroud C, O'Donnel R, Whitsett JPollack MM: Surfactant content in children with inflammatory lung disease. Crit Care Med 1996, 24: 1062-1067. 10.1097/00003246-199606000-00029View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Skelton R, Holland P, Darowski M, Chetcuti P, Morgan L, Harwood J: Abnormal surfactant composition and activity in severe bronchiolitis. Acta Paediatr 1999, 88: 942-946. 10.1080/08035259950168414View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kerr MH, Paton JY: Surfactant protein levels in severe respiratory syncytial virus infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999, 159: 1115-1118.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. van Schaik SM, Vargas I, Welliver RC, Enhorning G: Surfactant dysfunction develops in BALB/c mice infected with respiratory syncytial virus. Pediatr Res 1997, 42: 169-173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Luchetti M, Casiraghi G, Valsecchi R, Galassini E, Marraro G: Porcine-derived surfactant treatment of severe bronchiolitis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998, 42: 805-810.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Luchetti M, Ferrero F, Gallini C, Natale A, Pigna A, Tortorolo L, Marraro G: Multicenter, randomised, controlled study of porcine surfactant in severe respiratory syncytial virus-induced respiratory failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2002, 3: 261-268. 10.1097/00130478-200207000-00011View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tibby SM, Hatherill M, Wright SM, Wilson P, Postle AD, Murdoch IA: Exogenous surfactant supplementation in infants with respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000, 162: 1251-1256.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Thomas NJ, Hollenbeak CS, Lucking SE, Willson DF: Cost-effectiveness of exogenous surfactant therapy in pediatric patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005, 6: 160-165. 10.1097/01.PCC.0000154965.08432.16View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ghildyal R, Hartley C, Varrasso A, Meanger J, Voelker DR, Anders EM, Mills J: Surfactant protein A binds to the fusion glycoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus and neutralizes virion infectivity. J Infect Dis 1999, 180: 2009-2013. 10.1086/315134View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hickling TP, Malhotra R, Bright H, McDowell W, Blair ED, Sim RB: Lung surfactant protein A provides a route of entry for respiratory syncytial virus into host cells. Viral Immunol 2000, 13: 125-135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sano H, Nagai K, Tstsumi H, Kuroki Y: Lactoferrin and surfactant protein A exhibit distinct binding specificity to F protein and differently modulate respiratory syncytial virus infection. Eur J Immunol 2003, 33: 2894-2902. 10.1002/eji.200324218View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Weyer C, Sabat R, Wissel H, Kruger DH, Stevens PA, Prösch S: Surfactant protein A binding to cytomegalovirus proteins enhances virus entry into rat lung cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2000, 23: 71-78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. van Iwaarden JF, van Strijp JAG, Ebskamp MJM, Welmers AC, Verhoeff J, van Golde LMG: Surfactant protein A is opsonin in phagocytosis of herpes simplex virus type 1 by rat alveolar macrophages. Am J Physiol 1991, 261: L204-L209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. van Iwaarden JF, van Strijp JAG, Visser H, Haagsman HP, Verhoeff J, van Golde LMG: Binding of surfactant protein A (SP-A) to herpes simplex virus type 1-infected cells is mediated by the carbohydrate moiety of SP-A. J Biol Chem 1992, 267: 25039-25043.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hickling TP, Bright H, Wing K, Gower D, Martin SL, Sim RB, Malhotra R: A recombinant trimeric surfactant protein D carbohydrate recognition domain inhibits respiratory syncytial virus infection in vitro and in vivo. Eur J Immunol 1999, 29: 3478-3484. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199911)29:11<3478::AID-IMMU3478>3.3.CO;2-NView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hartshorn KL, White MR, Voelker DR, Coburn J, Zaner K, Crouch EC: Mechanism of binding of surfactant protein D to influenza A viruses: importance of binding to haemagglutinin to antiviral activity. Biochem J 2000, 351: 449-458. 10.1042/0264-6021:3510449PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hartshorn KL, White MR, Shepherd VL, Reid K, Jensenius JC, Crouch EC: Mechanisms of anti-influenza activity of surfactant proteins A and D: comparison with serum collectins. Am J Physiol 1997, 273: L1156-L1166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Li G, Siddiqui J, Hendry M, Akiyama J, Edmonson J, Brown C, Allen L, Levitt S, Poulain F, Hawgood S: Surfactant protein-A-deficient mice display an exaggerated early inflammatory response to a b-resistant strain of influenza A virus. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2002, 26: 277-282.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Barr FE, Pedigo H, Johnson TR, Shepherd VL: Surfactant protein-A enhances uptake of respiratory syncytial virus by monocytes and U937 macrophages. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2000, 23: 586-592.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. LeVine AM, Gwozdz J, Stark J, Bruno M, Whitsett J, Korfhagen T: Surfactant protein-A enhances respiratory syncytial virus clearance in vivo. J Clin Invest 1999, 103: 1015-1021.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. LeVine AM, Hartshorn KL, Elliott J, Whitsett J, Korfhagen T: Absence of SP-A modulates innate and adaptive defense responses to pulmonary influenza infection. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2002, 282: L563-L572.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. LeVine AM, Whitsett JA, Hartshorn KL, Crouch EC, Korfhagen TR: Surfactant protein D enhances clearance of influenza A virus from the lung in vivo. J Immunol 2001, 167: 5868-5873.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang SZ, Doyle IR, Nicholas TE, Forsyth KD: Plasma surfactant protein-B is elevated in infants with respiratory syncytial virus-induced bronchiolitis. Pediatr Res 1999, 46: 731-734.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Haagsman HP, Herias V, van Eijk M: Surfactant phospholipids and proteins in lung defence. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2003, 24: 1301-1303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Fisher J, Kao F, Jones C, White R, Benson B, Mason R: The coding sequence for the 32,000 dalton pulmonary surfactant-associated protein A is located on chromosome 10 and identifies two seperate restriction-fragment-length polymorphisms. Am J Human Gen 1987, 40: 503-511.Google Scholar
  47. DiAngelo S, Lin Z, Wang G, Phillips S, Ramet M, Luo J, Floros J: Novel, non-radioactive, simple and multiplex PCR-cRFLP methods for genotyping human SP-A and SP-D marker alleles. Dis markers 1999, 15: 269-281.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Haataja R, Hallman M: Surfactant proteins as genetic determinants of multifactorial pulmonary diseases. Ann Med 2002, 34: 324-333. 10.1080/078538902320772089View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Lofgren J, Ramet M, Renko M, Marttila R, Hallman M: Association between surfactant protein A gene locus and severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in infants. J Infect Dis 2002, 185: 283-289. 10.1086/338473View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Lahti M, Lofgren J, Marttila R, Renko M, Klaavuniemi T, Haataja R, Ramet M, Hallman M: Surfactant protein D gene polymorphism associated with severe respiratory syncytial virus infection. Pediatr Res 2002, 51: 696-699. 10.1203/01.PDR.0000015911.65104.93View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2005