Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Extravascular lung water (EVLW) does not change during alveolar recruitment in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Critical Care20048 (Suppl 1) :P30

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2497

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Analysis Multiple Regression
  • Tidal Volume
  • Control Mode
  • Pressure Control
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Objectives

To evaluate the relationship between the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and EVLW during alveolar recruitment at different positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels in ARDS in a prospective clinical trial.

Materials and methods

Ten patients suffering from ARDS were recruited. All patients were ventilated in pressure control mode (FiO2 = 1.0, respiratory rate = 20, I:E = 1:1). Following basic haemodynamic measurements and blood gas analysis, alveolar recruitment was done: PEEP was set at 26 cmH2O then 40 cmH2O pressure amplitude was applied for 40 s. Optimal PEEP was determined as follows: tidal volume was reduced to 4 ml/kg, then the PEEP was reduced from 26 cmH2O by 2 cmH2O in every 4 min and the optimal PEEP was defined as 2 cmH2O above the level of PEEP, where the PaO2 suddenly dropped by > 10%. After setting the PEEP at the optimal level, the 40/40 manoeuvre was applied again and the tidal volume was set as 6 ml/kg. The FiO2 was left at 100% until the end of the trial period of 1 hour. Haemodynamic parameters were determined by arterial thermodilution (PiCCO) on entering the study, then during the optimal PEEP defining process every 8 min, and 30 and 60 min after. Data are presented as mean ± SD. For statistical analysis multiple regression analysis, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used, respectively.

Results

The initially applied PEEP and the determined optimal PEEP did not differ significantly. Compared with baseline (T0) the PaO2 was significantly higher following alveolar recruitment (Tep) and also after 60 min. The EVLW did not change significantly during the study period (Table 1). Regression analysis could not reveal any significant relationship between PaO2 and EVLW at different PEEP.

Table 1

 

T0

Tep

P

PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg)

170 ± 112

330 ± 110

0.004

PEEP (cmH2O)

17 ± 4

15 ± 5

0.296

EVLW index (ml/kg)

16 ± 11

15 ± 10

0.825

Discussion

Recently we found significant correlation between EVLW and PaO2/FiO2 and PEEP levels. To date no clinical trials reported the relationship between oxygenation and EVLW during alveolar recruitment and PEEP optimisation. Based on the current results of this pilot study it seems that the EVLW does not directly affect oxygenation during recruitment. Completion of the study is required to evaluate the effect of EVLW on the optimal PEEP in ARDS.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary

References

  1. Szakmany T, Heigl P, Molnar Zs: Anaesth Int Care 2004, in press.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement