Extravascular lung water (EVLW) does not change during alveolar recruitment in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
© BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Published: 15 March 2004
To evaluate the relationship between the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and EVLW during alveolar recruitment at different positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels in ARDS in a prospective clinical trial.
Materials and methods
Ten patients suffering from ARDS were recruited. All patients were ventilated in pressure control mode (FiO2 = 1.0, respiratory rate = 20, I:E = 1:1). Following basic haemodynamic measurements and blood gas analysis, alveolar recruitment was done: PEEP was set at 26 cmH2O then 40 cmH2O pressure amplitude was applied for 40 s. Optimal PEEP was determined as follows: tidal volume was reduced to 4 ml/kg, then the PEEP was reduced from 26 cmH2O by 2 cmH2O in every 4 min and the optimal PEEP was defined as 2 cmH2O above the level of PEEP, where the PaO2 suddenly dropped by > 10%. After setting the PEEP at the optimal level, the 40/40 manoeuvre was applied again and the tidal volume was set as 6 ml/kg. The FiO2 was left at 100% until the end of the trial period of 1 hour. Haemodynamic parameters were determined by arterial thermodilution (PiCCO) on entering the study, then during the optimal PEEP defining process every 8 min, and 30 and 60 min after. Data are presented as mean ± SD. For statistical analysis multiple regression analysis, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used, respectively.
170 ± 112
330 ± 110
17 ± 4
15 ± 5
EVLW index (ml/kg)
16 ± 11
15 ± 10
Recently we found significant correlation between EVLW and PaO2/FiO2 and PEEP levels. To date no clinical trials reported the relationship between oxygenation and EVLW during alveolar recruitment and PEEP optimisation. Based on the current results of this pilot study it seems that the EVLW does not directly affect oxygenation during recruitment. Completion of the study is required to evaluate the effect of EVLW on the optimal PEEP in ARDS.
- Szakmany T, Heigl P, Molnar Zs: Anaesth Int Care 2004, in press.Google Scholar