Open Access

Closing the gap on unmeasured anions

Critical Care20037:219

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2189

Published: 8 May 2003

Abstract

Many critically ill and injured patients, especially those with metabolic acidosis, have abnormally high levels of unmeasured anions in their blood. At the same time, such patients are prone to hypoalbuminemia, which makes the traditional anion gap calculation inaccurate. Thus, little is known about the epidemiology and clinical consequences of an excess in unmeasured anions in the blood. Indeed, even the etiology of these "missing ions" is often unclear. Unfortunately, more precise means of quantifying unmeasured anions, such as the strong ion gap (SIG), are cumbersome to use clinically. However, a simple means of correcting the anion gap can be used to estimate SIG and may provide additional insight into this common clinical problem.

Keywords

acid–base balanceanion gapmetabolic acidosispHstrong ion differencestrong ion gap

Acid–base balance is among the most tightly regulated variables in human physiology. Acute changes in blood pH induce powerful regulatory effects at the level of the cell, the organ and the organism [1]. Yet the mechanisms responsible for local, regional and systemic acid–base control are incompletely understood, and controversy exists in the literature regarding what methods should be used to understand them [2]. The use of physical chemical principles to analyze clinical acid–base disorders has been advocated by some workers [35], and not by others [6, 7]. One difficulty with the physical chemical approach is that it cumbersome to apply clinically. For example, to calculate the strong ion gap (SIG) requires, at the very least, a programmable calculator [8]. In addition, some investigators have found that the pH and the standard base excess are better outcome predictors than the SIG [9]. Other investigators have found, however, that the SIG is a powerful predictor of outcome in acutely ill or injured patients [10, 11] and that other, more traditional, variables performed less well.

In the present issue of Critical Care, Moviat and colleagues report an analysis of 50 critically ill patients with metabolic acidosis [12]. The majority of their patients had multiple underlying mechanisms explaining their metabolic acidosis, and unmeasured strong anions were present in 98% (defined by SIG > 0). In keeping with previous studies [4, 5, 13], Moviat and colleagues found that while the uncorrected anion gap was of little value in detecting unmeasured ions, there was an excellent agreement between the SIG and the corrected anion gap. They thus demonstrated that the corrected anion gap could be used in place of the more cumbersome SIG.

However, the study of Moviat and colleagues raises some other fundamental questions. What is the normal SIG in critically ill patients? And what are the unmeasured anions? We unfortunately do not have the answer to either of these questions. An increased SIG appears to be common in acidotic patients such that even if one accepts a level of < 2 mEq as 'normal', then more than 75% of Moviat and colleagues' patients had an elevated level. The SIG was much higher in similar studies from the United Kingdom [9] and from Australia [13]; however, the use of gelatin in this population may have contributed. An exogenous source of unmeasured anions (e.g. gelatin) may also explain why some studies have not found a strong correlation between the SIG and outcome, whereas other studies, in which gelatins were not used, have shown that the SIG is associated with increased mortality [10, 11].

As regards the source of unmeasured anions, we can only speculate. An increased SIG appears to occur in patients with renal [12] and hepatic [8] impairment, and unexplained anions have been shown experimentally to arise from the liver in animals challenged with bolus intravenous endotoxin [14]. However, the precise identity or, more probably, identities remain unknown. Given their rapid appearance in the circulation in experimental models [14] and in patients sustaining vascular injury [10], it seems probable that these ions are acute phase proteins but this has not yet been satisfactorily explored.

Whatever the source of the SIG, it is easily estimated from the corrected anion gap and would appear to be frequently elevated in critically ill patients with metabolic acidosis. Preliminary data from our institution suggest that SIG > 2 mEq is independently associated with mortality in critically ill patients with metabolic acidosis [15]. Further studies are needed both to establish the true 'normal range' for the SIG and to determine its etiology.

Abbreviations

SIG: 

= strong ion gap.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The CRISMA Laboratory, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

References

  1. Kellum JA: Diagnosis and treatment of acid–base disorders. In Textbook of Critical Care (Edited by: Grenvik A, Ayres SM, Holbrook PR, Shoemaker WC). Philadelphia: WB Saunders 2000, 839-853.Google Scholar
  2. Severinghaus JW: Siggard-Andersen and the 'great transAtlantic acid–base debate'. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1993, 53: 99-104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Stewart P: Modern quantitative acid–base chemistry. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1983, 61: 1444-1461.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Figge J, Jabor A, Kazda A, Fencl V: Anion gap and hypoalbuminemia. Crit Care Med 1998, 26: 1807-1810.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kellum JA: Determinants of blood pH in health and disease. Crit Care 2000, 4: 6-14. 10.1186/cc644PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Siggard-Andersen O, Fogh-Andersen N: Base excess or buffer base (strong ion difference) as measure of a non-respiratory acid–base disturbance. Acta Anaesthiol Scand 1995, 39: 123-128.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Worthley L: Strong ion difference: a new paradigm or new clothes for the acid–base emperor. Crit Care Resuscitation 1999, 1: 211-214.Google Scholar
  8. Kellum JA, Kramer DJ, Pinsky MR: Strong ion gap: a methodology for exploring unexplained anions. J Crit Care 1995, 10: 51-55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cusack RJ, Rhodes A, Lochhead P, Jordan B, Perry S, Ball JAS, Grounds RM, Bennett ED: The strong ion gap does not have prognostic value in critically ill patients in a mixed medical/surgical adult ICU. Intensive Care Med 2002, 28: 864-869. 10.1007/s00134-002-1318-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaplan L, Bailey H, Klein D, Walters W, Kellum JA: Strong ion gap: a predictor of early mortality following blunt or penetrating trauma [abstract]. Crit Care Med 1999, 27: A42. 10.1097/00003246-199912001-00076View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Balasubramanyan N, Havens PL, Hoffman GM: Unmeasured anions identified by the Fencl–Stewart method predict mortality better than base excess, anion gap, and lactate in patients in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1999, 27: 1577-1581. 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00030View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Moviat MAM, van Haren FMP, van der Hoeven JG: Conventional or physicochemical approach in intensive care unit patients with metabolic acidosis. Crit Care 2003, 7: R41-R45. 10.1186/cc2184PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Story DA, Poustie S, Bellomo R, Story DA, Poustie S, Bellomo R: Estimating unmeasured anions in critically ill patients: anion-gap, base-deficit, and strong-ion-gap. Anesthesia 2002, 57: 1109-1114. 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02782_2.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Kramer DJ, Pinsky MR: Hepatic anion flux during acute endotoxemia. J Appl Physiol 1995, 78: 2212-2217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gunnerson KJ, Saul M, Kellum JA: Lactic versus nonlactic metabolic acidosis: outcomes in critically ill patients [abstract P17]. Crit Care 2003,7(suppl 2):S8. 10.1186/cc1906View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2003

Advertisement