Volume 7 Supplement 2

23rd International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

Open Access

Difference in end-tidal carbon dioxide changes during cardiopulmonary resuscitation between cardiac arrest due to asphyxia and VF/VT cardiac arrest

  • Š Grmec1 and
  • K Lah1
Critical Care20037(Suppl 2):P063

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1952

Published: 3 March 2003

Introduction

In recent years there has been an increased interest in the use of capnometry, the noninvasive continuous measurement of partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (petCO2) in expired air. petCO2 monitoring has been useful in determining the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. During cardiopulmonary reanimation (CPR) the petCO2 correlates with cardiac output and efficacy of cardiac compressions and as such has been shown to have prognostic value in CPR. This study was undertaken to compare initial petCO2 and petCO2 after 1 min during CPR in cardiac arrest due to asphyxia versus cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (VF).

Methods

This prospective study was conducted at the Center of Emergency Medicine – Pre-hospital Unit Maribor, Slovenia. The study included two groups of patients. The first group represented patients who suffered from heart arrest due to asphyxia. The causes of asphyxia included foreign body in the airway, aspiration, suicide with hanging, drowning, edema or tumor of airway and acute asthma attack. The initial rhythm was either asystole or pulse-less electrical activity. We compared this group of patients with those whose cause of heart arrest was AMI or malignant arrhythmias (VF or pulseless VT). petCO2 measurements were made by infrared side stream capnometer (BCI Capnocheck Model 20600A1; BCI international, Waukesha, WI, USA). petCO2 was measured for both groups immediately after intubation (first measurement) and then repeatedly every minute. Thus the initial, average and end petCO2 was detected for both groups. We performed the same procedure for the patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and for those without ROSC. Statistics used: Student's t test, χ2 test, P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

From February 1998 to February 2002 we analyzed 126 patients with cardiac arrest (initial rhythm VF/pulseless VT) and 36 patients with cardiac arrest due to asphyxia (initial rhythm asystolia or PEA). Patients with cardiac arrest caused by asphyxia were younger than patients whose cardiac arrest was provoked by VF (50.7 ± 21.4 vs 64.5 ± 15.4; P < 0,05). Time spent from beginning of the arrest to start of CPR was not significantly different (patients with ROSC: 8.2 ± 5.2 min vs 9.1 ± 4.6 min, P = 0,79; patients without ROSC: 14.1 ± 4.6 min vs 13.6 ± 5.2 min, P = 0.83). The mean value of EtCO2 for all patients (with and without ROSC) is presented in Table 1. In the group of patients who presented with arrest due to asphyxia there was no significant difference in initial values of petCO2, even when compared with those with and without ROSC (72.4 ± 13.4 mmHg vs 67.4 ± 14.6 mmHg). However, there was a significant difference in petCO2 after 1 min of CPR between those patients with ROSC and those without ROSC (34.5 ± 9.7 mmHg vs 18.1 ± 8.3 mmHg).
Table 1

The value of initial, average, final and petCO2 after 1 min of CPR for arrest due to asphyxia and VT/VF cardiac arrest

 

Initial petCO2 (mean)

petCO2 after 1 min of CPR (mean)

Average petCO2 (mean)

Final petCO2 (mean)

Asphyxial arrest

64.2 ± 15.2

28.4 ± 5.3

43.2 ± 10.2

28.4 ± 10.6

VF/VT cardiac arrest

12.5 ± 5.1

23.6 ± 4.3

16.4 ± 6.3

22.4 ± 8.3

P

< 0.05

0.71

< 0.05

0.65

Conclusions

In cardiac arrest caused by asphyxia, the initial petCO2 is much higher than in cardiac arrest due to VF and does not correlate with ROSC.

After 1 min of CPR, petCO2 correlates with ROSC and it is an important method for noninvasive monitoring of the effectiveness of CPR.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Emergency Medicine – Prehospital Unit Maribor

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2003

Advertisement