Skip to main content
  • Meeting abstract
  • Published:

Comfort levels of six CPAP delivery systems

Objectives

Not all CPAP systems have similar performance characteristics [1]. We aimed to assess comfort levels using six different CPAP delivery systems.

Methods

Six healthy blinded volunteers subjectively ranked each system for ease of breathing and comfort. The CPAP systems were set to 5 cmH2O CPAP via standardised tubing, mouthpiece and nasal clips. Pressure, flow and volume at the mouthpiece were measured using an Datex AS3 monitor and logged to PC.

Results

The pressure fluctuations between inspiration and expiration at 25 l/min correlated well with the subjective ranking (P = 0.017), with differences most evident in the expiratory phase of the cycle (P = 0.04).

Conclusions

CPAP systems that minimise pressure fluctuations are more comfortable. Patient comfort can be improved by choosing and setting CPAP systems to minimise pressure fluctuations.

Table

References

  1. Austin PN, et al.: Work of breathing characteristics of seven portable ventilators. Resuscitation 2001, 49: 158-167. 10.1016/S0300-9572(00)00358-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, R., Mecklenburgh, J., Saayman, A. et al. Comfort levels of six CPAP delivery systems. Crit Care 6 (Suppl 1), P39 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1738

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1738

Keywords