- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Do intensivists prognosticate patients differently from themselves or their loved ones?
Critical Care volume 19, Article number: P569 (2015)
There is a paucity of data about whether our treatment philosophy is different for our patients as compared with what we would have wanted for ourselves, or while acting as surrogate decision-makers for our loved ones.
An anonymous survey was sent to all the members of Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society and the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The first section comprised a hypothetical case scenario spanning over 6 weeks of ICU stay for a patient. At four different stages of the ICU stay, responders were requested to answer multiple-choice questions regarding the philosophy of treatment, based on their perceived prognosis of the patient at that particular time. The following two sections contained the same set of questions with the hypothetical scenario of responders acting as surrogate decision-makers for the patient and that of responders being patients themselves, in the same situation. The responses were compared amongst three sections at each stage using the chi-square test.
Of the ICU physicians who would withdraw care for their patient, the majority would also want the same for themselves. The disparity between decision to continue to treat the patients versus treating self or family increased with increasing length of stay.
Korones DN: What would you do if it were your kid?. N Engl J Med. 2013, 369: 1291-3. 10.1056/NEJMp1304941.
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, S., Green, C., Tiruvoipati, R. et al. Do intensivists prognosticate patients differently from themselves or their loved ones?. Crit Care 19 (Suppl 1), P569 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc14649
- Public Health
- Emergency Medicine
- Case Scenario
- Intensive Care Medicine
- Hypothetical Scenario