Skip to main content
Download PDF

Volume 19 Supplement 1

35th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

In-depth study of road accidents in Florence: understanding the biomechanical effects in major trauma involving vulnerable road users

Critical Care volume 19, Article number: P311 (2015) Cite this article

Introduction

Road accidents are the leading cause of death for young people, 50% being represented by vulnerable road users (VRU) (pedestrians, cyclists). In-depth accident studies assess the consequences of lack of use of safety devices and the need to develop new ones. Since 2009 a permanent team (physicians and engineers) has performed in-depth studies on road trauma admitted to our ICU [1].

Methods

The team studied 52 VRU crashes that occurred in an urban area. The clinical data included an injury assessment using total body CT scan, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), ICU and hospital length of stay and outcome score. Engineers collect data onsite with the partnership of the police, and assess the dynamics of the vehicles with the most advanced reconstruction techniques. Medical and engineering data were cross-matched during the correlation process. Injuries suffered by each person were related to specific impact objects.

Results

The average ISS is 21.5 (SD 10.9). Cars are the most involved in serious urban VRU crashes. Car-to-pedestrian crashes are the most frequent (50%). The impact speed is always over 40 km/hour (Table 1). The head and face are the most frequently injured part (48% of the 571 injuries collected), followed by lower extremities (15%). In terms of maximum AIS (MAIS), the head is the most severely injured region with 42% of MAIS 3+ (Figure 1).

Table 1 Accident dynamics: medium speed (km/hour)
Full size table
Figure 1
figure1

Frequency of lesions.

Full size image

Conclusion

The head is still the most frequently and severely injured region. The severity of injuries increases in the most rigid part of the car. Improving VRUs' safety devices (active and passive) to reduce impact speed and severity of the primary impact has to be the next step.

References

  1. 1.

    Piantini , et al: BMC Emerg Med. 2013, 13: 3-10.1186/1471-227X-13-3.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. A.O.U. Careggi, Firenze, Italy

    A Franci, A Peris & M Mangini

  2. University of Florence, Italy

    S Piantini & M Pierini

Authors
  1. A Franci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S Piantini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M Pierini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A Peris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M Mangini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franci, A., Piantini, S., Pierini, M. et al. In-depth study of road accidents in Florence: understanding the biomechanical effects in major trauma involving vulnerable road users. Crit Care 19, P311 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc14391

Download citation

Keywords

  • Injury Severity Score
  • Injured Region
  • Road Accident
  • Impact Speed
  • Safety Device

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535