Skip to main content

Volume 18 Supplement 2

Sepsis 2014

  • Poster presentation
  • Published:

Forty percent of hospitalizations after severe sepsis are potentially preventable


Patients are frequently rehospitalized in the 90 days after severe sepsis. The rate of readmission exceeds patients' baseline rate of hospitalization, and also exceeds the rate after matched nonsepsis hospitalizations [1]. We sought to determine the most common readmission diagnoses after severe sepsis, the extent to which readmissions may be preventable, and whether the pattern of readmission diagnoses differs from that of nonsepsis hospitalizations.


We studied participants in the US Health and Retirement Study with linked Medicare claims (1998 to 2010) [2]. Using validated methods [3, 4], we identified severe sepsis and nonsepsis hospitalizations, then measured 90-day readmissions in each cohort. Using Healthcare Cost & Utilization Project's Clinical Classification Software [5], we determined the 10 most common readmission diagnoses after severe sepsis. We measured rates of 'potentially preventable' readmissions using published definitions [6]. We compared rates of all-cause, potentially preventable, and cause-specific hospitalizations between survivors of severe sepsis and nonsepsis hospitalizations using chi-squared tests.


We identified 3,703 severe sepsis and 44,840 nonsepsis hospitalizations, of which 3,036 (82.0%) and 43,539 (93.1%) survived to discharge, respectively. In the next 90 days, 43.6% of severe sepsis survivors were rehospitalized, compared to 34.8% of nonsepsis survivors, P < 0.001. The top readmission diagnoses following severe sepsis (Table 1) included several recognized potentially preventable diagnoses: heart failure, pneumonia, exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and urinary infection. Also common were readmissions for sepsis, acute renal failure, and aspiration pneumonitis, diagnoses that could plausibly be prevented or treated early to prevent hospitalization. Patterns of readmission differed in severe sepsis survivors; rates of readmission for sepsis, renal failure, respiratory failure, device complication, and aspiration pneumonitis were higher and accounted for a greater proportion of the total readmissions. Potentially preventable hospitalizations - infection (sepsis, pneumonia, urinary tract, and skin or soft tissue), heart failure, COPD exacerbation, acute renal failure, and aspiration pneumonitis - accounted for 40.5% of all readmissions after severe sepsis (compared to 25.8% following nonsepsis admission, P < 0.001), and 19.6% of severe sepsis survivors experienced a readmission for one of these diagnoses (compared to 9.5% following a nonsepsis admission, P < 0.001).

Table 1 Top ten hospitalization diagnoses in the 90 days following severe sepsis.


Forty percent of hospitalizations after severe sepsis occur for diagnoses that may be preventable. A few disease categories account for a relatively large proportion of the hospitalizations after severe sepsis, suggesting the feasibility of tailoring postdischarge interventions to patient's personalized risk for these common postsepsis diagnoses.


  1. Prescott HC, Langa KM, Liu V, Escobar GJ, Iwashyna TJ: Increased 1-year healthcare use in survivors of severe sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014, 190: 62-69. 10.1164/rccm.201403-0471OC

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sonnega A, Faul JD, Ofstedal MB, Langa KM, Phillips JWR, Weir DR: Cohort profile: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Int J Epidemiol 2014, 43: 576-585. 10.1093/ije/dyu067

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR: Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med 2001, 29: 1303-1310. 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Iwashyna TJ, Odden A, Rohde J, Bonham C, Kuhn L, Malani P, Chen L, Flanders S: Identifying patients with severe sepsis using administrative claims: patient-level validation of the angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis. Med Care 2014, 52: e39-e43. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318268ac86

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Palmer L: Clinical Classifications Software (CCS), 2013.US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; []

  6. Culler SD, Parchman ML, Przybylski M: Factors related to potentially preventable hospitalizations among the elderly. Med Care 1998, 36: 804-817. 10.1097/00005650-199806000-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors declare financial support from the US National Institutes of Health and the US Department of Veteran's Affairs. There are no potential conflicts of interest. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prescott, H., Langa, K. & Iwashyna, T. Forty percent of hospitalizations after severe sepsis are potentially preventable. Crit Care 18 (Suppl 2), P35 (2014).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: