Percutaneous tracheostomy: it’s time for a shared approach!

In a previous issue of Critical Care, Simon and colleagues [1] reported the incidence of death related to percutaneous tracheostomy (PT). Fatal complications occurred in 31% of cases during the procedure and in 49% of cases within the first week of the tracheostomy [1]. In a later issue of Critical Care, Rajendran and Hutchinson [2] suggested the use of a checklist, adapted from the World Health Organization (WHO) surgical safety checklist, to improve safety and reduce errors and harm related to the PT procedure in critical care. However, a recent observational study performed in 101 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, did not find any reduction in mortality or complications after the implementation of the WHO checklist in more than 100,000 surgical procedures [3].

PT is widely used in critical care, although no clinical guidelines have been developed to suggest the best practice for this invasive and risky procedure. Surveys on PT, performed in different European countries, have shown the presence of a shared clinical practice [4]. We think that, lacking clinical guidelines to provide the best available scientific evidence and to reduce inappropriate variation in PT practice, a careful analysis of different surveys may suggest to physicians the most common practice associated with PT. Table 1 shows shared clinical practice for PT from an analysis of seven national surveys performed in France (where 152 intensive care units participated in the survey), Germany (505), Italy (130), The Netherlands (63), Spain (100), Switzerland (48), and the UK (197).

Table 1 Shared clinical practice for percutaneous tracheostomy from an analysis of seven national surveys in Europe