Skip to content


  • Letter
  • Open Access

Cannulation in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Critical Care201418:443

  • Published:


  • Subclavian Artery
  • Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
  • Graft Integrity
  • Extracorporeal Life Support
  • Postoperative Mobilization

We sincerely appreciate the studies performed about mobilization in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients [1]. An increasing number of studies can be seen recently in this very challenging group of patients. Mobilizing an ECMO patient is a complicated task to due to surrounding equipment and the nature of cannulations [2, 3]. Regarding postoperative mobilization, the most comfortable side for cannulation is the subclavian artery/femoral vein, as indicated by Abrams and colleagues [1]. There is no significant contraindication to mobilize patients with femoral arterial/venous cannulation but the procedure should be slightly difficult, as Abrams and colleagues stated. The question here is whether we should place the cannulae considering the possibility of postoperative mobilization. Does this possibility really have to affect our choice of cannulation side?

ECMO is a life-saving tool although it comes with many different complications, including cannulation-related bleeding, ischemia of ipsilateral extremity, vascular injury and infection [4]. Can the cannulation side make a difference and reduce the number of complications?

Abrams and colleagues suggest subclavian artery cannulation for easier mobilization, although this also sometimes comes with unexpected complications. We would like to report a patient treated with ECMO in our clinic who had some complications never reported previously in the literature. ECMO was established through the subclavian artery with a flow of 3,500 ml/minute but the patient had cerebral and pupil edema, so the flow was decreased to 2,000 ml/minute and the right arm was elevated – the symptoms regressed spontaneously. The patient was weaned from ECMO 8 days later and decannulated.

Cannulation sides may have advantages over one another although this does not suggest that we should go for a routine subclavian cannulation as indicated by Abrams and colleagues. We would like to hear opinions and experiences about similar complications regarding subclavian cannulation.

Authors’ response

Darryl Abrams, Matthew Bacchetta and Daniel Brodie

We thank Gokalp and colleagues for raising the issue of the optimal cannulation configuration for patients requiring venoarterial ECMO in whom mobilization is anticipated, and for highlighting potential issues with subclavian arterial reinfusion [1]. Although mobilization may be attempted with femoral cannulation, the only data regarding the safety of such mobilization have been reported with smaller central venous catheters rather than those used for ECMO [5]. For that reason, our preferred approach for ambulatory venoarterial ECMO, with few exceptions, is the combination of internal jugular venous drainage and subclavian arterial reinfusion via an end-to-side graft [6, 7]. The surgical technique needs to be meticulously executed to withstand patient mobilization and to function for days to weeks. The anastomotic approach differs from that which is commonly employed in the operating room for cardiothoracic surgeries [8]. In addition, when choosing the initial extracorporeal blood flow, it is important to consider the physiologic needs of the patient. High levels of venoarterial blood flow early on may have adverse consequences, including compromise of graft integrity and impairment of left ventricular emptying due to excessive afterload. Effective use of extracorporeal life support requires both well-executed cannulation and patient-focused management of the device. Ultimately, the choice of configuration has to balance the overall goals of therapy with the potential risks of that particular cannulation strategy.



Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.


Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Altinvadi Cd. No. 85, D:10, Narlidere, Izmir, 35360, Turkey
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Karabaglar, Izmir, 35360, Turkey
Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Tepecik, Izmir, 35370, Turkey


  1. Abrams D, Javidfar J, Farrand E, Mongero LB, Agerstrand CL, Ryan P, Zemmel D, Galuskin K, Morrone TM, Boerem P, Bacchetta M, Brodie D: Early mobilization of patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2014, 18: R38-10.1186/cc13746.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey P, Thomsen GE, Spuhler VJ, Blair R, Jewkes J, Bezdjian L, Veale K, Rodriquez L, Hopkins RO: Early activity is feasible and safe in respiratory failure patients. Crit Care Med. 2007, 35: 139-145. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251130.69568.87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rahimi RA, Skrzat J, Reddy DR, Zanni JM, Fan E, Stephens RS, Needham DM: Physical rehabilitation of patients in the intensive care unit requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a small case series. Phys Ther. 2013, 93: 248-255. 10.2522/ptj.20120336.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aubron C, Cheng AC, Pilcher D, Leong T, Magrin G, Cooper DJ, Scheinkestel C, Pellegrino V: Factors associated with outcomes of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: a 5-year cohort study. Crit Care. 2013, 17: R73-10.1186/cc12681.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Perme C, Nalty T, Winkelman C, KenjiNawa R, Masud F: Safety and efficacy of mobility interventions in patients with femoral catheters in the ICU: a prospective observational study. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2013, 24: 12-17.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Javidfar J, Brodie D, Costa J, Miller J, Jurrado J, LaVelle M, Newmark A, Takayama H, Sonett JR, Bacchetta M: Subclavian artery cannulation for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J. 2012, 58: 494-498. 10.1097/MAT.0b013e318268ea15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Javidfar J, Brodie D, Sonett J, Bacchetta M: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using a single cannula in patients with pulmonary hypertension and atrial septal defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012, 143: 982-984. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Biscotti M, Bacchetta M: The ‘sport model’: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation via subclavian artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014, in press,Google Scholar


© Gokalp et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.