Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Cytomegalovirus reactivation in critically ill burn patients: it’s time to worry about it!

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is widely documented in non-immunosuppressed critically ill patients and was reported in a previous issue of Critical Care to be associated with poor outcomes [1]. Although the question of the causative role of CMV remains under debate, a clinical trial aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic treatment for prevention of CMV reactivation in immunocompetent patients in critical care has started [2].

To date, few data on patients with burns have been published. However, we know that patients with burns are predisposed to herpes virus infection and that they are good ‘candidates’ for CMV reactivation. As expected, data show a high CMV reactivation rate in patients with burns, from 55 % to 71 % [3, 4]. Moreover, CMV reactivation seems to be intense, as 67 % of patients reactivated CMV with a plasma viral load of greater than 1,000 copies/mL and 33 % did so with a viral load of greater than 10,000 copies/mL in the study by Bordes and colleagues [4]. However, available data in the literature are extracted from a subgroup of 20 patients with burns among a cohort of 120 critically ill patients for the study by Limaye and colleagues [3] and from a cohort of 29 patients with severe burns for the study by Bordes and colleagues [4].

These preliminary results emphasize the fact that it is absolutely necessary to better investigate the natural history of CMV reactivation in burns, as antiviral prophylaxis is being evaluated in critically ill patients. Indeed, if antiviral therapy is proved to be efficient on the CMV reactivation, should we treat more than 50 % of our burn patients with antiviral treatment?

That is why we think that CMV reactivation still has to be studied in patients with burns, with the aim of answering the following questions:

  • Is CMV reactivation as frequent as previously reported in patients with severe burns?

  • What are the risk factors for CMV reactivation in patients with burns?

  • Is CMV reactivation associated with a poor outcome?

  • And is there a quantitative association between CMV reactivation and poor outcome?

The community of burn caregivers should promote large and prospective cohorts of patients in order to investigate CMV reactivation in severe burns as a first step to support the potential indication of antiviral therapy in the coming years.

Abbreviations

CMV:

Cytomegalovirus.

References

  1. 1.

    Heininger A, Haeberle H, Fischer I, Beck R, Riessen R, Rohde F, Meisner C, Jahn G, Koenigsrainer A, Unertl K, Hamprecht K: Cytomegalovirus reactivation and associated outcome of critically ill patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care 2011, 15: R77. 10.1186/cc10069

  2. 2.

    Millar J, Park SC, Cowley N, Moss P, Osman H, Bion JF: Anti-viral prophylaxis for prevention of cytomegalovirus reactivation in immunocompetent patients in critical care [abstract]. Intensive Care Med 2013,39(suppl 2):201-539.

  3. 3.

    Limaye AP, Kirby KA, Rubenfeld GD, Leisenring WM, Bulger EM, Neff MJ, Gibran NS, Huang ML, Santo Hayes TK, Corey L, Boeckh M: Cytomegalovirus reactivation in critically ill immunocompetent patients. JAMA 2008, 300: 413-422.

  4. 4.

    Bordes J, Maslin J, Prunet B, D’Aranda E, Lacroix G, Goutorbe P, Dantzer E, Meaudre E: Cytomegalovirus infection in severe burn patients monitoring by real-time polymerase chain reaction: a prospective study. Burns 2011, 37: 434-439. 10.1016/j.burns.2010.11.006

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Julien Bordes.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bordes, J., Goutorbe, P., Montcriol, A. et al. Cytomegalovirus reactivation in critically ill burn patients: it’s time to worry about it!. Crit Care 18, 410 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13742

Download citation

Keywords

  • Viral Load
  • Prospective Cohort
  • Critical Care
  • Causative Role
  • Antiviral Therapy